CVE-2002-0186
published 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0186: Buffer overflow in the SQLXML ISAPI extension of Microsoft SQL Server 2000 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via data queries with a long…
PriorityP348high7.5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCPIPAP
EXPLOIT
EPSS
55.45%
98.9th percentile
Buffer overflow in the SQLXML ISAPI extension of Microsoft SQL Server 2000 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via data queries with a long content-type parameter, aka "Unchecked Buffer in SQLXML ISAPI Extension."
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| microsoft | sql_server | — | — |
Detection & IOCsextracted from sources · hover to see the quote
- →Monitor HTTP requests to SQLXML ISAPI virtual directories for abnormally long `contenttype` (content-type) parameter values, which are the overflow trigger vector. ↗
- →Alert on requests targeting XML template files (e.g., catalog.xml) in SQLXML virtual directories where the `contenttype` query-string parameter contains an unusually large payload (repeated characters / padding). ↗
- →Unexpected crashes or restarts of inetinfo.exe on IIS hosts running SQL Server 2000 SQLXML ISAPI extensions may indicate active exploitation attempts. ↗
- ·SQLXML HTTP virtual directories are NOT enabled by default; this attack surface only exists on SQL Server 2000 instances where SQLXML ISAPI has been explicitly configured and exposed via IIS. ↗
- ·The SQLXML ISAPI extension runs with LocalSystem privileges, meaning successful exploitation grants the highest level of OS access. ↗
- ·The vulnerability was confirmed on SQL Server 2000 Gold; other versions may also be affected and should be evaluated. ↗
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q2/0100.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=102397345410856&w=2http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/9328.phphttp://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/811371http://www.osvdb.org/5347http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5004https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2002/ms02-030https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A484https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A489http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q2/0100.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=102397345410856&w=2http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/9328.phphttp://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/811371http://www.osvdb.org/5347http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5004https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2002/ms02-030https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A484https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A489
2002-07-03
Published