CVE-2003-1453
published 2003-12-31CVE-2003-1453: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the MytextSanitizer function in XOOPS 1.3.5 through 1.3.9 and XOOPS 2.0 through 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to…
PriorityP415medium4.3CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCNIPAN
EXPLOIT
EPSS
1.46%
70.2th percentile
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the MytextSanitizer function in XOOPS 1.3.5 through 1.3.9 and XOOPS 2.0 through 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a javascript: URL in an IMG tag.
Affected
7 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| xoops | xoops | — | — |
| xoops | xoops | — | — |
| xoops | xoops | — | — |
| xoops | xoops | — | — |
| xoops | xoops | — | — |
| xoops | xoops | — | — |
| xoops | xoops | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.04.3MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
vendor_redhat7.5HIGH
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-r9rp-5v8q-f7p8: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the MytextSanitizer function in XOOPS 1
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-04-29
CVE-2003-1453 [MEDIUM] CWE-79 GHSA-r9rp-5v8q-f7p8: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the MytextSanitizer function in XOOPS 1
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the MytextSanitizer function in XOOPS 1.3.5 through 1.3.9 and XOOPS 2.0 through 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a javascript: URL in an IMG tag.
Red Hat
CVE-2003-1331: Stack-based buffer overflow in the mysql_real_connect function in the MySql client library (libmysqlclient) 4
vendor_redhat·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2003-1331 [HIGH] CVE-2003-1331: Stack-based buffer overflow in the mysql_real_connect function in the MySql client library (libmysqlclient) 4
Stack-based buffer overflow in the mysql_real_connect function in the MySql client library (libmysqlclient) 4.0.13 and earlier allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long socket name, a different vulnerability than CVE-2001-1453.
Statement: Red Hat does not consider this issue to be a security vulnerability since no trust boundary is crossed. The user must voluntarily interact with the attack mechanism to exploit this flaw, with the result being the ability to run code as themselves.
No detection rules found.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3269http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/319715http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7434https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11872http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3269http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/319715http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7434https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11872
2003-12-31
Published