CVE-2005-0739
published 2005-05-02CVE-2005-0739: The IAPP dissector (packet-iapp.c) for Ethereal 0.9.1 to 0.10.9 does not properly use certain routines for formatting strings, which could leave it vulnerable…
PriorityP429medium5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCNINAP
EXPLOIT
EPSS
7.61%
93.8th percentile
The IAPP dissector (packet-iapp.c) for Ethereal 0.9.1 to 0.10.9 does not properly use certain routines for formatting strings, which could leave it vulnerable to buffer overflows, as demonstrated using modified length values that are not properly handled by the dissect_pdus and pduval_to_str functions.
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| ethereal_group | ethereal | <= 0.10.9 | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
vendor_redhat5.0MEDIUM
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Red Hat
security flaw
vendor_redhat·2005-03-11·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2005-0739 [MEDIUM] security flaw
security flaw
The IAPP dissector (packet-iapp.c) for Ethereal 0.9.1 to 0.10.9 does not properly use certain routines for formatting strings, which could leave it vulnerable to buffer overflows, as demonstrated using modified length values that are not properly handled by the dissect_pdus and pduval_to_str functions.
GHSA
GHSA-9c75-8rvc-pmm7: The IAPP dissector (packet-iapp
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-01
CVE-2005-0739 [MEDIUM] GHSA-9c75-8rvc-pmm7: The IAPP dissector (packet-iapp
The IAPP dissector (packet-iapp.c) for Ethereal 0.9.1 to 0.10.9 does not properly use certain routines for formatting strings, which could leave it vulnerable to buffer overflows, as demonstrated using modified length values that are not properly handled by the dissect_pdus and pduval_to_str functions.
No detection rules found.
http://anonsvn.ethereal.com/viewcvs/viewcvs.py?view=rev&rev=13707http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=111066805726551&w=2http://security.lss.hr/index.php?page=details&ID=LSS-2005-03-05http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-718http://www.ethereal.com/appnotes/enpa-sa-00018.htmlhttp://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200503-16.xmlhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:053http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-announce/2006-January/msg00003.htmlhttp://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-306.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12762https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9687http://anonsvn.ethereal.com/viewcvs/viewcvs.py?view=rev&rev=13707http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=111066805726551&w=2http://security.lss.hr/index.php?page=details&ID=LSS-2005-03-05http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-718http://www.ethereal.com/appnotes/enpa-sa-00018.htmlhttp://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200503-16.xmlhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:053http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-announce/2006-January/msg00003.htmlhttp://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-306.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12762https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9687
2005-05-02
Published