CVE-2005-1366
published 2005-05-16CVE-2005-1366: Pico Server (pServ) 3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to obtain the source code for CGI scripts via "dirname/../cgi-bin" in a URL.
PriorityP336high7.5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCPIPAP
EXPLOIT
EPSS
6.93%
93.3th percentile
Pico Server (pServ) 3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to obtain the source code for CGI scripts via "dirname/../cgi-bin" in a URL.
Affected
4 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pico_server | pico_server | — | — |
| pico_server | pico_server | — | — |
| pico_server | pico_server | — | — |
| pico_server | pico_server | — | — |
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
CWE
Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence
mitre_cwe
CWE-41 Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence
CWE-41: Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence
The product is vulnerable to file system contents disclosure through path equivalence. Path equivalence involves the use of special characters in file and directory names. The associated manipulations are intended to generate multiple names for the same object.
Path equivalence is usually employed in order to circumvent access controls expressed using an incomplete set of file name or file path representations. This is different from path traversal, wherein the manipulations are performed to generate a name for a different object.
Modes of Introduction:
Phase: Implementation
Common Consequences:
Scope: Confidentiality, Integrity, Access Control. Impact: Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Bypass Protection Mechanism. A
CWE
Path Equivalence: 'fakedir/../realdir/filename'
mitre_cwe·CVSS 10.0
[CRITICAL] CWE-57 Path Equivalence: 'fakedir/../realdir/filename'
CWE-57: Path Equivalence: 'fakedir/../realdir/filename'
The product contains protection mechanisms to restrict access to 'realdir/filename', but it constructs pathnames using external input in the form of 'fakedir/../realdir/filename' that are not handled by those mechanisms. This allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions against the targeted file.
Modes of Introduction:
Phase: Implementation
Common Consequences:
Scope: Confidentiality, Integrity. Impact: Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories.
Potential Mitigations:
[Implementation] Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be use
http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure&m=111625623909003&w=2http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=327708http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2005-011.txthttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13638http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure&m=111625623909003&w=2http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=327708http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2005-011.txthttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13638
2005-05-16
Published