CVE-2006-1078
published 2006-03-09CVE-2006-1078: Multiple buffer overflows in htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b, and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via…
PriorityP425high8.4CVSS 3.1
AVLACLPRNUINSUCHIHAH
EPSS
0.53%
40.5th percentile
Multiple buffer overflows in htpasswd, as used in Acme thttpd 2.25b, and possibly other products such as Apache, might allow local users to gain privileges via (1) a long command line argument and (2) a long line in a file. NOTE: since htpasswd is normally installed as a non-setuid program, and the exploit is through command line options, perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. However, if there are some typical or recommended configurations that use htpasswd with sudo privileges, or common products that access htpasswd remotely, then perhaps it should be included.
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| acme_labs | thttpd | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.18.4HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv2.07.2HIGHAV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-09/0547.htmlhttp://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31975http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41279http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-January/051562.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=thttpd&m=114153031201867&w=2http://marc.info/?l=thttpd&m=114154083000296&w=2http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175949/m-privacy-TightGate-Pro-Code-Execution-Insecure-Permissions.htmlhttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2004/Oct/0359.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Nov/13http://www.security-express.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-10/1117.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426823/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16972https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25216https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/31236http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-09/0547.htmlhttp://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31975http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41279http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-January/051562.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=thttpd&m=114153031201867&w=2http://marc.info/?l=thttpd&m=114154083000296&w=2http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175949/m-privacy-TightGate-Pro-Code-Execution-Insecure-Permissions.htmlhttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2004/Oct/0359.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Nov/13http://www.security-express.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-10/1117.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426823/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16972https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25216https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/31236
2006-03-09
Published