CVE-2006-3670
published 2006-07-18CVE-2006-3670: Stack-based buffer overflow in Winlpd 1.26 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in a request to TCP port 515.
PriorityP349high7.5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCPIPAP
EXPLOIT
EPSS
7.30%
93.6th percentile
Stack-based buffer overflow in Winlpd 1.26 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in a request to TCP port 515.
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabox | winlpd | <= 1.26 | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.07.5HIGHAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
vendor_redhat5.0MEDIUM
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-8p5h-r86g-3q74: Stack-based buffer overflow in Winlpd 1
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-01
CVE-2006-3670 [HIGH] GHSA-8p5h-r86g-3q74: Stack-based buffer overflow in Winlpd 1
Stack-based buffer overflow in Winlpd 1.26 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in a request to TCP port 515.
Red Hat
CVE-2007-5045: Argument injection vulnerability in Apple QuickTime 7
vendor_redhat·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2007-5045 [MEDIUM] CVE-2007-5045: Argument injection vulnerability in Apple QuickTime 7
Argument injection vulnerability in Apple QuickTime 7.1.5 and earlier, when running on systems with Mozilla Firefox before 2.0.0.7 installed, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a QuickTime Media Link (QTL) file with an embed XML element and a qtnext parameter containing the Firefox "-chrome" argument. NOTE: this is a related issue to CVE-2006-4965 and the result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-3670.
Statement: Not vulnerable. These issues did not affect the versions of Firefox as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
No detection rules found.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://foro.elhacker.net/index.php/topic%2C131756.htmhttp://secunia.com/advisories/21058http://securitytracker.com/id?1016510http://www.osvdb.org/displayvuln.php?osvdb_id=27332http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/441302/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19011http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2823https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27759https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/2014http://foro.elhacker.net/index.php/topic%2C131756.htmhttp://secunia.com/advisories/21058http://securitytracker.com/id?1016510http://www.osvdb.org/displayvuln.php?osvdb_id=27332http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/441302/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19011http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2823https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27759https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/2014
2006-07-18
Published