CVE-2006-6425
published 2006-12-27CVE-2006-6425: Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP daemon (IMAPD) in Novell NetMail before 3.52e FTF2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via…
PriorityP263critical9CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuSCCICAC
EXPLOIT
EPSS
58.47%
99.0th percentile
Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP daemon (IMAPD) in Novell NetMail before 3.52e FTF2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors involving the APPEND command.
Affected
6 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| novell | netmail | <= 3.5.2 | — |
| novell | netmail | — | — |
| novell | netmail | — | — |
| novell | netmail | — | — |
| novell | netmail | — | — |
| novell | netmail | — | — |
Detection & IOCsextracted from sources · hover to see the quote
commanda002 APPEND saved-messages (\Seen) <1358 bytes junk><payload><\xeb\x06><2 bytes junk><ret><\xe9 offset><150 bytes junk>↗
bytes↗
\xeb\x06
- →Detect oversized IMAP APPEND commands targeting Novell NetMail IMAPD; the exploit sends a malformed APPEND to 'saved-messages' with a payload offset of 1358 bytes before shellcode. ↗
- →Look for IMAP APPEND commands with excessively long arguments (>1358 bytes) on port 143 directed at Novell NetMail 3.52 servers, indicative of stack buffer overflow exploitation. ↗
- →The exploit requires prior authentication; monitor for authenticated IMAP sessions immediately followed by anomalously large APPEND commands as a lateral-movement or post-auth exploitation indicator. ↗
- →The exploit uses a short JMP (\xeb\x06) followed by a 4-byte return address and a near JMP (\xe9) for shellcode redirection; presence of these byte sequences within an IMAP APPEND payload is a strong exploit indicator. ↗
- ·The published Metasploit module targets only Windows 2000 SP0-SP4 English with a hardcoded return address; exploitation against other OS versions or service packs requires a different return address. ↗
- ·Payload space is constrained to 700 bytes and bad characters \x00, \x0a, \x0d, \x20 must be avoided; detection signatures should account for encoded payloads that avoid these bytes. ↗
- ·The exploit uses EXITFUNC=thread, meaning the spawned shellcode exits via thread termination rather than process exit, which may affect post-exploitation forensic artifacts. ↗
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
Exploit-DB
Novell NetMail 3.52d - IMAP APPEND Buffer Overflow (Metasploit)
exploitdb·2010-05-09
CVE-2006-6425 Novell NetMail 3.52d - IMAP APPEND Buffer Overflow (Metasploit)
Novell NetMail 3.52d - IMAP APPEND Buffer Overflow (Metasploit)
---
##
# $Id: novell_netmail_append.rb 9262 2010-05-09 17:45:00Z jduck $
##
##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to
# redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit
# Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use.
# http://metasploit.com/framework/
##
require 'msf/core'
class Metasploit3 'Novell NetMail %q{
This module exploits a stack buffer overflow in Novell's Netmail 3.52 IMAP APPEND
verb. By sending an overly long string, an attacker can overwrite the
buffer and control program execution.
},
'Author' => [ 'MC' ],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'Version' => '$Revision: 9262 $',
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2006-6425' ],
[ 'OSVDB', '31362' ],
[ '
Metasploit
Novell NetMail IMAP APPEND Buffer Overflow
metasploit
Novell NetMail IMAP APPEND Buffer Overflow
Novell NetMail IMAP APPEND Buffer Overflow
This module exploits a stack buffer overflow in Novell's Netmail 3.52 IMAP APPEND verb. By sending an overly long string, an attacker can overwrite the buffer and control program execution.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://secunia.com/advisories/23437http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2080http://securitytracker.com/id?1017437http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/258753http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/455200/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21723http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/5134http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-054.htmlhttps://secure-support.novell.com/KanisaPlatform/Publishing/134/3096026_f.SAL_Public.htmlhttp://secunia.com/advisories/23437http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2080http://securitytracker.com/id?1017437http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/258753http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/455200/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21723http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/5134http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-054.htmlhttps://secure-support.novell.com/KanisaPlatform/Publishing/134/3096026_f.SAL_Public.html
2006-12-27
Published