CVE-2007-1253
published 2007-03-03CVE-2007-1253: Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh.py Script for Blender 0.1.9h, as used in (b) Blender before 2.43, allows user-assisted remote…
PriorityP338critical9.3CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCCICAC
EPSS
2.69%
84.3th percentile
Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh.py Script for Blender 0.1.9h, as used in (b) Blender before 2.43, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code by importing a crafted (1) KML or (2) KMZ file.
Affected
8 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| blender | blender | <= 2.42a | — |
| blender | blender | — | — |
| blender | blender | — | — |
| blender | blender | — | — |
| blender | blender | >= 0 < 2.42a-6 | 2.42a-6 |
| blender | blender | >= 0 < 2.42a-6 | 2.42a-6 |
| blender | blender | >= 0 < 2.42a-6 | 2.42a-6 |
| debian | blender | < blender 2.42a-6 (bookworm) | blender 2.42a-6 (bookworm) |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.09.3CRITICALAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
osv9.3CRITICAL
vendor_debian9.3MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Debian
CVE-2007-1253: blender - Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh.py Script for Blender...
vendor_debian·2007·CVSS 9.3
CVE-2007-1253 [CRITICAL] CVE-2007-1253: blender - Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh.py Script for Blender...
Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh.py Script for Blender 0.1.9h, as used in (b) Blender before 2.43, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code by importing a crafted (1) KML or (2) KMZ file.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 2.42a-6)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 2.42a-6)
sid: resolved (fixed in 2.42a-6)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 2.42a-6)
GHSA
GHSA-grpq-v752-9mjq: Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-01
CVE-2007-1253 [HIGH] CWE-94 GHSA-grpq-v752-9mjq: Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh
Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh.py Script for Blender 0.1.9h, as used in (b) Blender before 2.43, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code by importing a crafted (1) KML or (2) KMZ file.
OSV
CVE-2007-1253: Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh
osv·2007-03-03·CVSS 9.3
CVE-2007-1253 [CRITICAL] CVE-2007-1253: Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh
Eval injection vulnerability in the (a) kmz_ImportWithMesh.py Script for Blender 0.1.9h, as used in (b) Blender before 2.43, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code by importing a crafted (1) KML or (2) KMZ file.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
CWE
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
mitre_cwe
CWE-95 Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CWE-95: Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes code syntax before using the input in a dynamic evaluation call (e.g. "eval").
Modes of Introduction:
Phase: Implementation
Note: REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Phase: Implementation
Note: This weakness is prevalent in handler/dispatch procedures that might want to invoke a large number of functions, or set a large number of variables.
Common Consequences:
Scope: Confidentiality. Impact: Read Files or Directories, Read Application Data. The injected code could access restricted data / files.
Scope: Access Control. Impact:
CWE
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
mitre_cwe
CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Modes of Introduction:
Phase: Implementation
Note: REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
Common Consequences:
Scope: Access Control. Impact: Bypass Protection Mechanism. In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Scope: Access Control. Impact: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity. Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from ac
http://osvdb.org/33836http://secunia.com/advisories/24232http://secunia.com/advisories/24233http://secunia.com/advisories/24991http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2007-39/advisory/http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2007-40/advisory/http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200704-19.xmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22770http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017714http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0798https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32778http://osvdb.org/33836http://secunia.com/advisories/24232http://secunia.com/advisories/24233http://secunia.com/advisories/24991http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2007-39/advisory/http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2007-40/advisory/http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200704-19.xmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22770http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017714http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0798https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32778
2007-03-03
Published