CVE-2007-5468
published 2007-10-16CVE-2007-5468: Cisco CallManager 5.1.1.3000-5 does not verify the Digest authentication header URI against the Request URI in SIP messages, which allows remote attackers to…
PriorityP431medium5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCPINAN
EPSS
1.59%
72.7th percentile
Cisco CallManager 5.1.1.3000-5 does not verify the Digest authentication header URI against the Request URI in SIP messages, which allows remote attackers to use sniffed Digest authentication credentials to call arbitrary telephone numbers or spoof caller ID (aka "toll fraud and authentication forward attack").
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| cisco | call_manager | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
vendor_redhat5.0MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-wr7h-6372-vgmj: Cisco CallManager 5
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-01
CVE-2007-5468 [MEDIUM] GHSA-wr7h-6372-vgmj: Cisco CallManager 5
Cisco CallManager 5.1.1.3000-5 does not verify the Digest authentication header URI against the Request URI in SIP messages, which allows remote attackers to use sniffed Digest authentication credentials to call arbitrary telephone numbers or spoof caller ID (aka "toll fraud and authentication forward attack").
Red Hat
Multiple Wireshark issues (CVE-2007-0457, CVE-2007-0458, CVE-2007-0459)
vendor_redhat·2007-02-01·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2007-0458 [MEDIUM] Multiple Wireshark issues (CVE-2007-0457, CVE-2007-0458, CVE-2007-0459)
Multiple Wireshark issues (CVE-2007-0457, CVE-2007-0458, CVE-2007-0459)
Unspecified vulnerability in the HTTP dissector in Wireshark (formerly Ethereal) 0.99.3 and 0.99.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via unspecified vectors, a different issue than CVE-2006-5468.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-October/066581.htmlhttp://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-October/066691.htmlhttp://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-October/066694.htmlhttp://secunia.com/advisories/27231http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26057http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3534https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37197http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-October/066581.htmlhttp://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-October/066691.htmlhttp://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-October/066694.htmlhttp://secunia.com/advisories/27231http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26057http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3534https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37197
2007-10-16
Published