CVE-2008-0547
published 2008-02-01CVE-2008-0547: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/utilities_ConfigHelp.asp in CandyPress (CP) 4.1.1.26, and probably earlier 4.x and 3.x versions, allows…
PriorityP420medium4.3CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCNIPAN
EXPLOIT
EPSS
3.73%
88.4th percentile
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/utilities_ConfigHelp.asp in CandyPress (CP) 4.1.1.26, and probably earlier 4.x and 3.x versions, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the helpfield parameter.
Affected
2 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| shoppingtree | candypress_store | — | — |
| shoppingtree | candypress_store | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.04.3MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
vendor_redhat5.8MEDIUM
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-666g-7q89-v43p: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/utilities_ConfigHelp
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-01
CVE-2008-0547 [MEDIUM] CWE-79 GHSA-666g-7q89-v43p: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/utilities_ConfigHelp
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/utilities_ConfigHelp.asp in CandyPress (CP) 4.1.1.26, and probably earlier 4.x and 3.x versions, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the helpfield parameter.
Red Hat
evolution-data-server: S/MIME signatures are considered to be valid even for modified messages (MITM)
vendor_redhat·2008-12-11·CVSS 5.8
CVE-2009-0547 [MEDIUM] evolution-data-server: S/MIME signatures are considered to be valid even for modified messages (MITM)
evolution-data-server: S/MIME signatures are considered to be valid even for modified messages (MITM)
Evolution 2.22.3.1 checks S/MIME signatures against a copy of the e-mail text within a signed-data blob, not the copy of the e-mail text displayed to the user, which allows remote attackers to spoof a signature by modifying the latter copy, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-5077.
No detection rules found.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://secunia.com/advisories/28662http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3600http://www.candypress.com/CPforum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10630&PN=1http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487058/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27454http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0314https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39940https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4988http://secunia.com/advisories/28662http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3600http://www.candypress.com/CPforum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10630&PN=1http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487058/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27454http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0314https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39940https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4988
2008-02-01
Published