CVE-2008-4292
published 2008-09-27CVE-2008-4292: Opera before 9.52 does not check the CRL override upon encountering a certificate that lacks a CRL, which has unknown impact and attack vectors. NOTE: it is…
PriorityP334critical10CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCCICAC
EPSS
1.92%
77.3th percentile
Opera before 9.52 does not check the CRL override upon encountering a certificate that lacks a CRL, which has unknown impact and attack vectors. NOTE: it is not clear whether this is a vulnerability, but the vendor included it in a security section of the advisory.
Affected
54 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| opera | opera_browser | <= 9.51 | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
| opera | opera_browser | — | — |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235298http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=241988&t=1222404671&page=1http://my.opera.com/yngve/blog/2008/06/27/nobody-checks-the-padlock-debunked-by-opera-usershttp://secunia.com/advisories/31549http://secunia.com/advisories/32538http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200811-01.xmlhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/19/2http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/24/4http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/freebsd/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/linux/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/mac/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/solaris/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/952/http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2416https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45589http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235298http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=241988&t=1222404671&page=1http://my.opera.com/yngve/blog/2008/06/27/nobody-checks-the-padlock-debunked-by-opera-usershttp://secunia.com/advisories/31549http://secunia.com/advisories/32538http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200811-01.xmlhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/19/2http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/24/4http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/freebsd/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/linux/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/mac/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/solaris/952/http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/952/http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2416https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45589
2008-09-27
Published