CVE-2009-0036
published 2009-02-11CVE-2009-0036: Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c in libvirt_proxy 0.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges by sending a…
PriorityP423medium4.4CVSS 2.0
AVLACMAuNCPIPAP
EXPLOIT
EPSS
1.17%
63.8th percentile
Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c in libvirt_proxy 0.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges by sending a portion of the header of a virProxyPacket packet, and then sending the remainder of the packet with crafted values in the header, related to use of uninitialized memory in a validation check.
Affected
6 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | libvirt | < libvirt 0.5.1-7 (bookworm) | libvirt 0.5.1-7 (bookworm) |
| libvirt | libvirt | — | — |
| redhat | libvirt | >= 0 < 0.5.1-7 | 0.5.1-7 |
| redhat | libvirt | >= 0 < 0.5.1-7 | 0.5.1-7 |
| redhat | libvirt | >= 0 < 0.5.1-7 | 0.5.1-7 |
| redhat | libvirt | >= 0 < 0.5.1-7 | 0.5.1-7 |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.04.4MEDIUMAV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
osv4.4MEDIUM
vendor_debian4.4LOW
vendor_redhat4.4MEDIUM
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Red Hat
libvirt: libvirt_proxy buffer overflow
vendor_redhat·2009-01-27·CVSS 4.4
CVE-2009-0036 [MEDIUM] libvirt: libvirt_proxy buffer overflow
libvirt: libvirt_proxy buffer overflow
Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c in libvirt_proxy 0.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges by sending a portion of the header of a virProxyPacket packet, and then sending the remainder of the packet with crafted values in the header, related to use of uninitialized memory in a validation check.
Debian
CVE-2009-0036: libvirt - Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c i...
vendor_debian·2009·CVSS 4.4
CVE-2009-0036 [MEDIUM] CVE-2009-0036: libvirt - Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c i...
Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c in libvirt_proxy 0.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges by sending a portion of the header of a virProxyPacket packet, and then sending the remainder of the packet with crafted values in the header, related to use of uninitialized memory in a validation check.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 0.5.1-7)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 0.5.1-7)
forky: resolved (fixed in 0.5.1-7)
sid: resolved (fixed in 0.5.1-7)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 0.5.1-7)
GHSA
GHSA-wm6m-gxgr-pvq6: Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-02
CVE-2009-0036 [MEDIUM] CWE-119 GHSA-wm6m-gxgr-pvq6: Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy
Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c in libvirt_proxy 0.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges by sending a portion of the header of a virProxyPacket packet, and then sending the remainder of the packet with crafted values in the header, related to use of uninitialized memory in a validation check.
OSV
CVE-2009-0036: Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy
osv·2009-02-11·CVSS 4.4
CVE-2009-0036 [MEDIUM] CVE-2009-0036: Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy
Buffer overflow in the proxyReadClientSocket function in proxy/libvirt_proxy.c in libvirt_proxy 0.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges by sending a portion of the header of a virProxyPacket packet, and then sending the remainder of the packet with crafted values in the header, related to use of uninitialized memory in a validation check.
No detection rules found.
http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libvirt.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2bb0657e28http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/10/8http://secunia.com/advisories/34397http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0382.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33724https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484947https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10127https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-January/msg00699.htmlhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-January/msg00726.htmlhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-January/msg00728.htmlhttp://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libvirt.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2bb0657e28http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/10/8http://secunia.com/advisories/34397http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0382.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33724https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484947https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10127https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-January/msg00699.htmlhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-January/msg00726.htmlhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-January/msg00728.html
2009-02-11
Published