CVE-2009-3305
published 2009-12-24CVE-2009-3305: Polipo 1.0.4, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a request with a Cache-Control header that lacks a…
PriorityP428medium5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCNINAP
EXPLOIT
EPSS
10.07%
95.0th percentile
Polipo 1.0.4, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a request with a Cache-Control header that lacks a value for the max-age field, which triggers a segmentation fault in the httpParseHeaders function in http_parse.c, and possibly other unspecified vectors.
Affected
2 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| polipo | polipo | >= 0 < 1.0.4-1.1 | 1.0.4-1.1 |
| pps.jussieu | polipo | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
osv5.0MEDIUM
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-v2mm-g69c-c43h: Polipo 1
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-02
CVE-2009-3305 [MEDIUM] CWE-20 GHSA-v2mm-g69c-c43h: Polipo 1
Polipo 1.0.4, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a request with a Cache-Control header that lacks a value for the max-age field, which triggers a segmentation fault in the httpParseHeaders function in http_parse.c, and possibly other unspecified vectors.
OSV
CVE-2009-3305: Polipo 1
osv·2009-12-24·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2009-3305 [MEDIUM] CVE-2009-3305: Polipo 1
Polipo 1.0.4, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a request with a Cache-Control header that lacks a value for the max-age field, which triggers a segmentation fault in the httpParseHeaders function in http_parse.c, and possibly other unspecified vectors.
No detection rules found.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547047http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/dca6877a8117f0dfhttp://secunia.com/advisories/37607http://secunia.com/advisories/38647http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2002http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37463http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547047http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/dca6877a8117f0dfhttp://secunia.com/advisories/37607http://secunia.com/advisories/38647http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2002http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37463
2009-12-24
Published