CVE-2009-3639
published 2009-10-28CVE-2009-3639: The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0'…
PriorityP335medium5.8CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCNIPAP
EPSS
5.70%
92.2th percentile
The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 client certificate, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended client-hostname restrictions via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
Affected
5 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | proftpd-dfsg | < proftpd-dfsg 1.3.2a-2 (bookworm) | proftpd-dfsg 1.3.2a-2 (bookworm) |
| proftpd | proftpd | <= 1.3.2 | — |
| proftpd | proftpd | — | — |
| proftpd | proftpd | — | — |
| proftpd | proftpd | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.05.8MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
osv5.9MEDIUM
vendor_debian5.9LOW
vendor_redhat5.9MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-4vq9-9g4j-pgg4: The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-02·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2009-3639 [MEDIUM] GHSA-4vq9-9g4j-pgg4: The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1
The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 client certificate, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended client-hostname restrictions via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
OSV
CVE-2009-3639: The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1
osv·2009-10-28·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2009-3639 [MEDIUM] CVE-2009-3639: The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1
The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 client certificate, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended client-hostname restrictions via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
Red Hat
ProFTPD: Doesn't properly handle NULL character in subjectAltName
vendor_redhat·2009-08-06·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2009-3639 [MEDIUM] ProFTPD: Doesn't properly handle NULL character in subjectAltName
ProFTPD: Doesn't properly handle NULL character in subjectAltName
The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 client certificate, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended client-hostname restrictions via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
Debian
CVE-2009-3639: proftpd-dfsg - The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the...
vendor_debian·2009·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2009-3639 [MEDIUM] CVE-2009-3639: proftpd-dfsg - The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the...
The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 client certificate, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended client-hostname restrictions via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1.3.2a-2)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1.3.2a-2)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1.3.2a-2)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1.3.2a-2)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1.3.2a-2)
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3275http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=125630966510672&w=2http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=125632960508211&w=2http://secunia.com/advisories/37131http://secunia.com/advisories/37219http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1925http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:288http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36804https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530719https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53936https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-November/msg00642.htmlhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-November/msg00649.htmlhttp://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3275http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=125630966510672&w=2http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=125632960508211&w=2http://secunia.com/advisories/37131http://secunia.com/advisories/37219http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1925http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:288http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36804https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530719https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53936https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-November/msg00642.htmlhttps://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-November/msg00649.html
2009-10-28
Published