CVE-2010-0097
published 2010-01-22CVE-2010-0097: ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2)…
PriorityP430medium4.3CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCNIPAN
EPSS
9.36%
94.9th percentile
ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
Affected
45 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | bind9 | < bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg-1 (bookworm) | bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg-1 (bookworm) |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.04.3MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
osv4.3MEDIUM
vendor_debian4.3MEDIUM
vendor_redhat4.3MEDIUM
vendor_ubuntu2.6LOW
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Ubuntu
Bind vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2010-01-20·CVSS 2.6
CVE-2010-0097 [LOW] Bind vulnerabilities
Title: Bind vulnerabilities
Summary: Bind vulnerabilities
It was discovered that Bind would incorrectly cache bogus NXDOMAIN
responses. When DNSSEC validation is in use, a remote attacker could
exploit this to cause a denial of service, and possibly poison DNS caches.
(CVE-2010-0097)
USN-865-1 provided updated Bind packages to fix a security vulnerability.
The upstream security patch to fix CVE-2009-4022 was incomplete and
CVE-2010-0290 was assigned to the issue. This update corrects the problem.
Original advisory details:
Michael Sinatra discovered that Bind did not correctly validate certain
records added to its cache. When DNSSEC validation is in use, a remote
attacker could exploit this to spoof DNS entries and poison DNS caches.
Among other things, this could lead to misdirected e
Red Hat
BIND DNSSEC NSEC/NSEC3 validation code could cause bogus NXDOMAIN responses
vendor_redhat·2010-01-19·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2010-0097 [MEDIUM] BIND DNSSEC NSEC/NSEC3 validation code could cause bogus NXDOMAIN responses
BIND DNSSEC NSEC/NSEC3 validation code could cause bogus NXDOMAIN responses
ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
Debian
CVE-2010-0097: bind9 - ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 befo...
vendor_debian·2010·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2010-0097 [MEDIUM] CVE-2010-0097: bind9 - ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 befo...
ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1:9.7.0.dfsg-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1:9.7.0.dfsg-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1:9.7.0.dfsg-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1:9.7.0.dfsg-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1:9.7.0.dfsg-1)
GHSA
GHSA-jh4w-mm2p-mw7c: ISC BIND 9
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-03
CVE-2010-0097 [MEDIUM] CWE-20 GHSA-jh4w-mm2p-mw7c: ISC BIND 9
ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
OSV
CVE-2010-0097: ISC BIND 9
osv·2010-01-22·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2010-0097 [MEDIUM] CVE-2010-0097: ISC BIND 9
ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/unixware7/714/security/p535243_uw7/p535243b.txthttp://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2011//Oct/msg00003.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034196.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034202.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00009.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127195582210247&w=2http://secunia.com/advisories/38169http://secunia.com/advisories/38219http://secunia.com/advisories/38240http://secunia.com/advisories/39334http://secunia.com/advisories/39582http://secunia.com/advisories/40086http://securitytracker.com/id?1023474http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-77-1021798.1-1http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5002http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2010-0018http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2054http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/360341http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:021http://www.osvdb.org/61853http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37865http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-888-1http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0176http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0622http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0981http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1352https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554851https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/55753https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04952488https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12205https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7212https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7430https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9357https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0062.htmlhttps://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0095.htmlhttps://www.isc.org/advisories/CVE-2010-0097ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/unixware7/714/security/p535243_uw7/p535243b.txthttp://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2011//Oct/msg00003.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034196.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034202.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00009.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127195582210247&w=2http://secunia.com/advisories/38169http://secunia.com/advisories/38219http://secunia.com/advisories/38240http://secunia.com/advisories/39334http://secunia.com/advisories/39582http://secunia.com/advisories/40086http://securitytracker.com/id?1023474http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-77-1021798.1-1http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5002http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2010-0018http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2054http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/360341http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:021http://www.osvdb.org/61853http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37865http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-888-1http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0176http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0622http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0981http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1352https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554851https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/55753https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04952488https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12205https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7212https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7430https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9357https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0062.htmlhttps://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0095.htmlhttps://www.isc.org/advisories/CVE-2010-0097
2010-01-22
Published