CVE-2010-0816
published 2010-05-12CVE-2010-0816: Integer overflow in inetcomm.dll in Microsoft Outlook Express 5.5 SP2, 6, and 6 SP1; Windows Live Mail on Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Vista SP1 and SP2…
PriorityP264critical9.3CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCCICAC
EXPLOIT
EPSS
20.32%
97.2th percentile
Integer overflow in inetcomm.dll in Microsoft Outlook Express 5.5 SP2, 6, and 6 SP1; Windows Live Mail on Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Vista SP1 and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2, and Windows 7; and Windows Mail on Windows Vista SP1 and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2, and Windows 7 allows remote e-mail servers and man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) POP3 or (2) IMAP response, as demonstrated by a certain +OK response on TCP port 110, aka "Outlook Express and Windows Mail Integer Overflow Vulnerability."
Affected
2 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| microsoft | outlook_express | — | — |
| microsoft | outlook_express | — | — |
Detection & IOCsextracted from sources · hover to see the quote
- →Monitor for crafted POP3 or IMAP server responses containing anomalously large message size values (e.g., 357913944) in +OK responses on TCP port 110, which trigger the integer overflow in inetcomm.dll. ↗
- →The exploit requires no authentication; a rogue server or MITM attacker sends a specially crafted +OK POP3 response to a connecting mail client. Detect unexpected inbound POP3 server responses (port 110) with extremely large octet-count values in the +OK line. ↗
- →The vulnerability is triggered by the POP3 +OK response carrying an oversized message size field; inspect POP3 traffic for +OK responses where the message size value causes an integer overflow (values near or exceeding 2^32 boundaries, e.g., 357913944 * 100). ↗
- ·The exploit PoC listens on TCP port 110 acting as a rogue POP3 server; detection should cover both direct rogue-server scenarios and man-in-the-middle interception of legitimate POP3 sessions. ↗
- ·The vulnerability also affects IMAP responses, not only POP3; detection rules should be extended to cover IMAP traffic in addition to POP3 port 110. ↗
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2010-05/0068.htmlhttp://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13&Itemid=13http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40052http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-131A.htmlhttps://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-030https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6734http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2010-05/0068.htmlhttp://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13&Itemid=13http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40052http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-131A.htmlhttps://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-030https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6734
2010-05-12
Published