CVE-2010-2792
published 2010-08-30CVE-2010-2792: Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-xpi) plug-in 2.2 for Firefox allows local users to obtain sensitive information, and conduct man-in-the-middle attacks…
PriorityP44low3.3CVSS 2.0
AVLACMAuNCPIPAN
EPSS
0.25%
15.8th percentile
Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-xpi) plug-in 2.2 for Firefox allows local users to obtain sensitive information, and conduct man-in-the-middle attacks, by providing a UNIX socket for communication between this plug-in and the client (aka qspice-client) in qspice 0.3.0, and then accessing this socket.
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | spice-xpi | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.03.3LOWAV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
vendor_redhat3.3LOW
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-jj4v-3jp4-pvcr: Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-xpi) plug-in 2
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-17
CVE-2010-2792 [LOW] CWE-362 GHSA-jj4v-3jp4-pvcr: Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-xpi) plug-in 2
Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-xpi) plug-in 2.2 for Firefox allows local users to obtain sensitive information, and conduct man-in-the-middle attacks, by providing a UNIX socket for communication between this plug-in and the client (aka qspice-client) in qspice 0.3.0, and then accessing this socket.
Red Hat
spice-xpi/qspice-client unix socket race
vendor_redhat·2010-08-25·CVSS 3.3
CVE-2010-2792 [LOW] spice-xpi/qspice-client unix socket race
spice-xpi/qspice-client unix socket race
Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-xpi) plug-in 2.2 for Firefox allows local users to obtain sensitive information, and conduct man-in-the-middle attacks, by providing a UNIX socket for communication between this plug-in and the client (aka qspice-client) in qspice 0.3.0, and then accessing this socket.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
spice-client (CSB6) UNIX socket race [v.spice-client-0.6.3-2.el6_0.3]
bugzilla·2010-11-16·CVSS 3.3
[LOW] spice-client (CSB6) UNIX socket race [v.spice-client-0.6.3-2.el6_0.3]
spice-client (CSB6) UNIX socket race [v.spice-client-0.6.3-2.el6_0.3]
Description of problem:
While looking through the source code for spice-xpi I ran across this print:
448: sprintf (mdData.name, "/tmp/spice.%d.uds", m_child_pid);
449: m_external_controller = new SpiceController(mdData);
It appears that if a local attacker is able to create a socket with the expected name, they could steal the password which is later sent over this socket.
Therefore, we would classify this as having moderate security impact.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[ogvura@ogvura ~]$ rpm -q spice-client
spice-client-0.6.3-2.el6_0.3.x86_64
[ogvura@ogvura ~]$ rpm -q spice-xpi
spice-xpi-2.4-1.el6.x86_64
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Connect via the spicec to the VM.
2. Open the Spice
Bugzilla
CVE-2010-2792 spice-xpi/qspice-client unix socket race
bugzilla·2010-08-02·CVSS 3.3
CVE-2010-2792 [LOW] CVE-2010-2792 spice-xpi/qspice-client unix socket race
CVE-2010-2792 spice-xpi/qspice-client unix socket race
There is a race in spice-xpi when a local attacker is able to create a unix socket with the expected name that is used for parameter passing (password, cert file) between spice-xpi and spice client.
Discussion:
This issue has been addressed in following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Via RHSA-2010:0632 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0632.html
---
This issue has been addressed in following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Via RHSA-2010:0651 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0651.html
http://osvdb.org/67619http://secunia.com/advisories/41120http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0632.htmlhttp://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0651.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/42711http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2181https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620350http://osvdb.org/67619http://secunia.com/advisories/41120http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0632.htmlhttp://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0651.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/42711http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2181https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620350
2010-08-30
Published