CVE-2011-0447
published 2011-02-14CVE-2011-0447: Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header…
PriorityP426medium6.8CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCPIPAP
EPSS
1.41%
69.8th percentile
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
Affected
35 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| actionpack_project | actionpack | >= 2.1.0 < 2.3.11 | 2.3.11 |
| actionpack_project | actionpack | >= 3.0.0 < 3.0.4 | 3.0.4 |
| debian | python-django | < python-django 1.2.5-1 (bookworm) | python-django 1.2.5-1 (bookworm) |
| debian | rails | < rails 2.3.11-0.1 (bookworm) | rails 2.3.11-0.1 (bookworm) |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | — | — |
| djangoproject | django | >= 1.1 < 1.1.4 | 1.1.4 |
| djangoproject | django | >= 1.2 < 1.2.5 | 1.2.5 |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
| rubyonrails | rails | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.06.8MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
ghsa6.8MEDIUM
osv6.8MEDIUM
vendor_debian6.8MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
Cross-site request forgery in Django
ghsa·2018-07-23·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0696 [MEDIUM] CWE-352 Cross-site request forgery in Django
Cross-site request forgery in Django
Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.
OSV
Cross-site request forgery in Django
osv·2018-07-23·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0696 [MEDIUM] Cross-site request forgery in Django
Cross-site request forgery in Django
Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.
GHSA
actionpack Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
ghsa·2017-10-24·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0447 [MEDIUM] CWE-352 actionpack Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
actionpack Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
OSV
actionpack Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
osv·2017-10-24·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0447 [MEDIUM] actionpack Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
actionpack Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
OSV
CVE-2011-0696: Django 1
osv·2011-02-14·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0696 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-0696: Django 1
Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.
OSV
CVE-2011-0447: Ruby on Rails 2
osv·2011-02-14·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0447 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-0447: Ruby on Rails 2
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
Debian
CVE-2011-0447: rails - Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does ...
vendor_debian·2011·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0447 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-0447: rails - Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does ...
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 2.3.11-0.1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 2.3.11-0.1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 2.3.11-0.1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 2.3.11-0.1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 2.3.11-0.1)
Debian
CVE-2011-0696: python-django - Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP...
vendor_debian·2011·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0696 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-0696: python-django - Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP...
Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1.2.5-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1.2.5-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1.2.5-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1.2.5-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1.2.5-1)
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack: CSRF flaws due improper validation of HTTP headers containing X-Requested-With header
bugzilla·2011-02-15·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2011-0447 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack: CSRF flaws due improper validation of HTTP headers containing X-Requested-With header
CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack: CSRF flaws due improper validation of HTTP headers containing X-Requested-With header
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2011-0447 to
the following vulnerability:
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before
3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an
X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to
conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX
or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and
HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
References:
[1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0447
[2] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/msg/c22ea1668c0d181c?dmode=source&output=gpl
Bugzilla
CVE-2011-0446 CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack various flaws [epel-5]
bugzilla·2011-02-15·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2011-0446 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-0446 CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack various flaws [epel-5]
CVE-2011-0446 CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack various flaws [epel-5]
epel-5 tracking bug for rubygem-actionpack: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s).
This bug is never intended to be made public, please put any public notes
in the 'blocks' bugs.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Discussion:
Adding parent bug 731436
New bodhi update url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=677626,677631,731436
---
Adding parent bug 732156
New bodhi update url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=677626,677631,731436,732156
---
rubygem-actionpack-2.3.18-1.el5,rubygem-activerecord-2.3.18-1.el5,rubygem-activesupport-2.3.18-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedorapr
Bugzilla
CVE-2011-0446 CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack: various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2011-02-15·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2011-0446 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-0446 CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack: various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2011-0446 CVE-2011-0447 rubygem-actionpack: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora
versions.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the
respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product.
Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available.
Bodhi update submission link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=677626
Please note: this issue affects multiple
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/msg/c22ea1668c0d181c?dmode=source&output=gplainhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-April/057650.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/055074.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/055088.htmlhttp://secunia.com/advisories/43274http://secunia.com/advisories/43666http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2011/2/8/csrf-protection-bypass-in-ruby-on-railshttp://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2247http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46291http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025060http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0587http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0877http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/msg/c22ea1668c0d181c?dmode=source&output=gplainhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-April/057650.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/055074.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/055088.htmlhttp://secunia.com/advisories/43274http://secunia.com/advisories/43666http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2011/2/8/csrf-protection-bypass-in-ruby-on-railshttp://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2247http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46291http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025060http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0587http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0877
2011-02-14
Published