CVE-2012-3789
published 2012-08-06CVE-2012-3789: Unspecified vulnerability in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.4.7rc3, 0.5.x before 0.5.6rc3, 0.6.0.x before 0.6.0.9rc1, and 0.6.x before 0.6.3rc1 allows remote…
PriorityP420medium5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCNINAP
EPSS
1.97%
77.9th percentile
Unspecified vulnerability in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.4.7rc3, 0.5.x before 0.5.6rc3, 0.6.0.x before 0.6.0.9rc1, and 0.6.x before 0.6.3rc1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process hang) via unknown behavior on a Bitcoin network.
Affected
26 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | <= 0.5.6 | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
| bitcoin | bitcoin_core | — | — |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
arXiv
Attack of the Clones: Measuring the Maintainability, Originality and Security of Bitcoin 'Forks' in the Wild
arxiv_fulltext·2022-01-21
Attack of the Clones: Measuring the Maintainability, Originality and Security of Bitcoin 'Forks' in the Wild
Attack of the Clones: Measuring the Maintainability, Originality and Security of Bitcoin `Forks' in the Wild
Attack of the Clones
Jusop Choi1 Wonseok Choi1 William Aiken1 Hyoungshick Kim1 Jun Ho Huh2 Taesoo Kim3 Yongdae Kim4 Ross Anderson5
Jusop Choi et al.
Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea Samsung Research, Republic of Korea Georgia Institute of Technology, USA Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea Cambridge University, UK
## Abstract
Since Bitcoin appeared in 2009, over 6,000 different cryptocurrency projects have followed. The cryptocurrency world may be the only technology where a massive number of competitors offer similar services yet claim unique benefits, including scalability, fast transactions, and security. But are these projects real
arXiv
Coinbugs: Enumerating Common Blockchain Implementation-Level Vulnerabilities
arxiv_fulltext·2021-04-13
Coinbugs: Enumerating Common Blockchain Implementation-Level Vulnerabilities
Coinbugs: Enumerating Common Blockchain Implementation-Level Vulnerabilities
Aleksandar Kircanski and Terence Tarvis\ Group
## Abstract
A good amount of effort has been dedicated to surveying and systematizing Ethereum smart contract security bug classes, see e.g. . There is, however, a gap in literature when it comes to surveying implementation-level security bugs that commonly occur in basic PoW blockchain node implementations, discovered during the first decade of Bitcoin's existence. This paper attempts to fill this void. In particular, if software which participates in a network by validating and generating new blocks is developed from scratch, WCGW - What Could Go Wrong?
Ten broad bug type categories are listed and for each category, known examples are linked. Blockchain, as desig
2012-08-06
Published