CVE-2012-5633
published 2013-03-12CVE-2012-5633: The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security…
PriorityP339medium5.8CVSS 2.0
AVNACMAuNCPIPAN
EPSS
8.16%
94.2th percentile
The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request.
Affected
15 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | cxf | <= 2.5.7 | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
| apache | cxf | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.05.8MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
vendor_redhat5.8MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
OSV
Improper Authentication in Apache CXF
osv·2022-05-13
CVE-2012-5633 [MEDIUM] Improper Authentication in Apache CXF
Improper Authentication in Apache CXF
The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request.
GHSA
Improper Authentication in Apache CXF
ghsa·2022-05-13
CVE-2012-5633 [MEDIUM] CWE-287 Improper Authentication in Apache CXF
Improper Authentication in Apache CXF
The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request.
Red Hat
apache-cxf: Bypass of security constraints on WS endpoints when using WSS4JInInterceptor
vendor_redhat·2013-02-08·CVSS 5.8
CVE-2012-5633 [MEDIUM] apache-cxf: Bypass of security constraints on WS endpoints when using WSS4JInInterceptor
apache-cxf: Bypass of security constraints on WS endpoints when using WSS4JInInterceptor
The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request.
Package: Security (Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5) - Affected
Package: Security (Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5) - Affected
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2012-5633 CVE-2013-0239 cxf various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2013-02-08·CVSS 5.8
CVE-2012-5633 [MEDIUM] CVE-2012-5633 CVE-2013-0239 cxf various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2012-5633 CVE-2013-0239 cxf various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link
noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this
tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
Bodhi notes field when available.
Please note: this issue affects multiple suppo
Bugzilla
CVE-2012-5633 CVE-2013-0239 jbossws-cxf various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2013-02-08·CVSS 5.8
CVE-2012-5633 [MEDIUM] CVE-2012-5633 CVE-2013-0239 jbossws-cxf various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2012-5633 CVE-2013-0239 jbossws-cxf various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link
noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this
tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
Bodhi notes field when available.
Please note: this issue affects multip
Bugzilla
CVE-2012-5633 jbossws-cxf, apache-cxf: Bypass of security constraints on WS endpoints when using WSS4JInInterceptor
bugzilla·2012-12-20·CVSS 5.8
CVE-2012-5633 [MEDIUM] CVE-2012-5633 jbossws-cxf, apache-cxf: Bypass of security constraints on WS endpoints when using WSS4JInInterceptor
CVE-2012-5633 jbossws-cxf, apache-cxf: Bypass of security constraints on WS endpoints when using WSS4JInInterceptor
If web services are deployed using Apache CXF with the WSS4JInInterceptor enabled to apply WS-Security processing, HTTP GET requests to these services will always be granted access, without applying authentication checks. The URIMappingInterceptor is a legacy mechanism for allowing REST-like access (via GET requests) to simple SOAP services. A remote attacker could use this flaw to access the REST-like interface of a simple SOAP service using GET requests that bypass the security constraints applied by WSS4JInInterceptor. This flaw is only exploitable if WSS4JInInterceptor is used to apply WS-Security processing. Services that use WS-SecurityPolicy to apply security are not
http://cxf.apache.org/cve-2012-5633.htmlhttp://osvdb.org/90079http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/120213/Apache-CXF-WS-Security-URIMappingInterceptor-Bypass.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0256.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0257.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0258.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0259.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0726.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0743.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0749.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/39http://secunia.com/advisories/51988http://secunia.com/advisories/52183http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7933293/why-does-apache-cxf-ws-security-implementation-ignore-get-requestshttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1409324http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1420698http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57874https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/81980https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4629https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3575https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff42cfa5e7d75b7c1af0e37589140a8f1999e578a75738740b244bd4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttp://cxf.apache.org/cve-2012-5633.htmlhttp://osvdb.org/90079http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/120213/Apache-CXF-WS-Security-URIMappingInterceptor-Bypass.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0256.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0257.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0258.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0259.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0726.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0743.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0749.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/39http://secunia.com/advisories/51988http://secunia.com/advisories/52183http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7933293/why-does-apache-cxf-ws-security-implementation-ignore-get-requestshttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1409324http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1420698http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57874https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/81980https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4629https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3575https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff42cfa5e7d75b7c1af0e37589140a8f1999e578a75738740b244bd4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E
2013-03-12
Published