CVE-2013-4550
published 2013-12-24CVE-2013-4550: Bip before 0.8.9, when running as a daemon, writes SSL handshake errors to an unexpected file descriptor that was previously associated with stderr before…
PriorityP426medium5.1CVSS 2.0
AVNACHAuNCPIPAP
EPSS
2.22%
80.7th percentile
Bip before 0.8.9, when running as a daemon, writes SSL handshake errors to an unexpected file descriptor that was previously associated with stderr before stderr has been closed, which allows remote attackers to write to other sockets and have an unspecified impact via a failed SSL handshake, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5268. NOTE: some sources originally mapped this CVE to two different types of issues; this CVE has since been SPLIT, producing CVE-2011-5268.
Affected
17 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | bip | < bip 0.8.9-1 (bookworm) | bip 0.8.9-1 (bookworm) |
| duckcorp | bip | <= 0.8.8 | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | — | — |
| duckcorp | bip | >= 0 < 0.8.9-1 | 0.8.9-1 |
| duckcorp | bip | >= 0 < 0.8.9-1 | 0.8.9-1 |
| duckcorp | bip | >= 0 < 0.8.9-1 | 0.8.9-1 |
| duckcorp | bip | >= 0 < 0.8.9-1 | 0.8.9-1 |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.05.1MEDIUMAV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
osv4.3MEDIUM
vendor_debian4.3MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Debian
CVE-2013-4550: bip - Bip before 0.8.9, when running as a daemon, writes SSL handshake errors to an un...
vendor_debian·2013·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2013-4550 [MEDIUM] CVE-2013-4550: bip - Bip before 0.8.9, when running as a daemon, writes SSL handshake errors to an un...
Bip before 0.8.9, when running as a daemon, writes SSL handshake errors to an unexpected file descriptor that was previously associated with stderr before stderr has been closed, which allows remote attackers to write to other sockets and have an unspecified impact via a failed SSL handshake, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5268. NOTE: some sources originally mapped this CVE to two different types of issues; this CVE has since been SPLIT, producing CVE-2011-5268.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
Debian
CVE-2011-5268: bip - connection.c in Bip before 0.8.9 does not properly close sockets, which allows r...
vendor_debian·2011·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2011-5268 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-5268: bip - connection.c in Bip before 0.8.9 does not properly close sockets, which allows r...
connection.c in Bip before 0.8.9 does not properly close sockets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor consumption and crash) via multiple failed SSL handshakes, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-4550. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2013-4550 because it is a different type of issue.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 0.8.9-1)
GHSA
GHSA-5pvf-rqx7-vw7q: Bip before 0
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-17·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2013-4550 [MEDIUM] GHSA-5pvf-rqx7-vw7q: Bip before 0
Bip before 0.8.9, when running as a daemon, writes SSL handshake errors to an unexpected file descriptor that was previously associated with stderr before stderr has been closed, which allows remote attackers to write to other sockets and have an unspecified impact via a failed SSL handshake, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5268. NOTE: some sources originally mapped this CVE to two different types of issues; this CVE has since been SPLIT, producing CVE-2011-5268.
GHSA
GHSA-w599-7m7q-hvh9: connection
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-17·CVSS 5.1
CVE-2011-5268 [MEDIUM] GHSA-w599-7m7q-hvh9: connection
connection.c in Bip before 0.8.9 does not properly close sockets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor consumption and crash) via multiple failed SSL handshakes, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-4550. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2013-4550 because it is a different type of issue.
OSV
CVE-2011-5268: connection
osv·2013-12-24·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2011-5268 [MEDIUM] CVE-2011-5268: connection
connection.c in Bip before 0.8.9 does not properly close sockets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor consumption and crash) via multiple failed SSL handshakes, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-4550. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2013-4550 because it is a different type of issue.
OSV
CVE-2013-4550: Bip before 0
osv·2013-12-24·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2013-4550 [MEDIUM] CVE-2013-4550: Bip before 0
Bip before 0.8.9, when running as a daemon, writes SSL handshake errors to an unexpected file descriptor that was previously associated with stderr before stderr has been closed, which allows remote attackers to write to other sockets and have an unspecified impact via a failed SSL handshake, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5268. NOTE: some sources originally mapped this CVE to two different types of issues; this CVE has since been SPLIT, producing CVE-2011-5268.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2013-4550 CVE-2011-5268 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak
bugzilla·2013-11-08·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2013-4550 [MEDIUM] CVE-2013-4550 CVE-2011-5268 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak
CVE-2013-4550 CVE-2011-5268 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak
Marc Deslauriers reports:
Hello,
bip 0.8.8 and earlier contains an issue where failed SSL handshakes result in a
resource leak. A remote attacker can use this flaw to cause bip to run out of
resources, resulting in a denial of service.
Upstream bug:
https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/261
Fixed by the following commit in 0.8.9:
https://projects.duckcorp.org/projects/bip/repository/revisions/df45c4c2d6f892e3e1dec23ce0ed2575b53a7d8c
Downstream bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/bip/+bug/1247888
Discussion:
Created bip tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1028608]
Affects: epel-6 [bug 1028609]
---
Created bip tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: epel-5 [bug 1028610]
---
b
Bugzilla
CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [epel-6]
bugzilla·2013-11-08·CVSS 5.1
CVE-2013-4550 [MEDIUM] CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [epel-6]
CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [epel-6]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link
noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this
tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
Bodhi notes field when available.
epel-6 tracking bug for bip: see bloc
Bugzilla
CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [epel-5]
bugzilla·2013-11-08·CVSS 5.1
CVE-2013-4550 [MEDIUM] CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [epel-5]
CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [epel-5]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link
noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this
tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
Bodhi notes field when available.
epel-5 tracking bug for bip: see bloc
Bugzilla
CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2013-11-08·CVSS 5.1
CVE-2013-4550 [MEDIUM] CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [fedora-all]
CVE-2013-4550 bip: failed SSL handshake resource leak [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link
noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this
tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
Bodhi notes field when available.
Please note: this issue affects multip
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-November/121868.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-November/122274.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-November/122278.htmlhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/02/9https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/261https://projects.duckcorp.org/versions/13http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-November/121868.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-November/122274.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-November/122278.htmlhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/02/9https://projects.duckcorp.org/issues/261https://projects.duckcorp.org/versions/13
2013-12-24
Published