CVE-2014-3507
published 2014-08-13CVE-2014-3507: Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to…
PriorityP433medium5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCNINAP
EPSS
51.44%
98.8th percentile
Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via zero-length DTLS fragments that trigger improper handling of the return value of a certain insert function.
Affected
56 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | openssl | < openssl 1.0.1i-1 (bookworm) | openssl 1.0.1i-1 (bookworm) |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
Detection & IOCsextracted from sources · hover to see the quote
- →The vulnerability is triggered by zero-length DTLS fragments sent to a DTLS server or client; monitor for DTLS traffic containing zero-length fragment payloads as a potential exploitation indicator. ↗
- →The vulnerable code resides in d1_both.c within the DTLS implementation of OpenSSL; focus code-level detection or integrity monitoring on this file. ↗
- →An attacker can force OpenSSL to leak memory indefinitely via crafted DTLS packets; watch for sustained memory growth in processes using OpenSSL over DTLS (UDP port 4433 or application-specific DTLS ports). ↗
- ·Affected OpenSSL versions are 0.9.8o through pre-0.9.8zb, 1.0.0a through pre-1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 through pre-1.0.1i. OpenSSL 0.9.8e (used in RHEL 5) and 1.0.0 packages in RHEL 6 prior to the 1.0.1e rebase are NOT affected. ↗
- ·The flaw can affect both DTLS servers and DTLS clients using vulnerable OpenSSL versions, broadening the attack surface beyond server-only deployments. ↗
CVSS provenance
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
osv5.0MEDIUM
vendor_debian5.0MEDIUM
vendor_redhat5.0MEDIUM
vendor_ubuntu5.0MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-r65x-rhxq-wj53: Memory leak in d1_both
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-17
CVE-2014-3507 [MEDIUM] GHSA-r65x-rhxq-wj53: Memory leak in d1_both
Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via zero-length DTLS fragments that trigger improper handling of the return value of a certain insert function.
OSV
CVE-2014-3507: Memory leak in d1_both
osv·2014-08-13·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3507 [MEDIUM] CVE-2014-3507: Memory leak in d1_both
Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via zero-length DTLS fragments that trigger improper handling of the return value of a certain insert function.
OSV
openssl vulnerabilities
osv·2014-08-07·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3505 [MEDIUM] openssl vulnerabilities
openssl vulnerabilities
Adam Langley and Wan-Teh Chang discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled
certain DTLS packets. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2014-3505)
Adam Langley discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory when
processing DTLS handshake messages. A remote attacker could use this issue
to cause OpenSSL to consume memory, resulting in a denial of service.
(CVE-2014-3506)
Adam Langley discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory when
processing DTLS fragments. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to leak memory, resulting in a denial of service. This issue
only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. (CVE-2014-3507)
Ivan Fratric discovered that OpenSSL incorrectl
BSD
FreeBSD-SA-14:18.openssl: OpenSSL multiple vulnerabilities
bsd_advisories·2014-09-09·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3506 [MEDIUM] FreeBSD-SA-14:18.openssl: OpenSSL multiple vulnerabilities
FreeBSD-SA-14:18.openssl Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: OpenSSL multiple vulnerabilities
Category: contrib
Module: openssl
Announced: 2014-09-09
Affects: All supported versions of FreeBSD.
Corrected: 2014-08-07 21:04:42 UTC (stable/10, 10.0-STABLE)
2014-09-09 10:09:46 UTC (releng/10.0, 10.0-RELEASE-p8)
2014-08-07 21:06:34 UTC (stable/9, 9.3-STABLE)
2014-09-09 10:13:46 UTC (releng/9.3, 9.3-RELEASE-p1)
2014-09-09 10:13:46 UTC (releng/9.2, 9.2-RELEASE-p11)
2014-09-09 10:13:46 UTC (releng/9.1, 9.1-RELEASE-p18)
2014-08-07 21:06:34 UTC (stable/8, 8.4-STABLE)
2014-09-09 10:13:46 UTC (releng/8.4, 8.4-RELEASE-p15)
CVE Name: CVE-2014-3506, CVE-2014-3507, CVE-2014-3508, CVE-2014-3510,
CVE-2014-3509, CVE-2014-3511, CVE-2014-3512, CVE-2014-5139
For general information regarding FreeBSD
Ubuntu
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2014-08-07·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3505 [MEDIUM] OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Title: OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in OpenSSL.
Adam Langley and Wan-Teh Chang discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled
certain DTLS packets. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2014-3505)
Adam Langley discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory when
processing DTLS handshake messages. A remote attacker could use this issue
to cause OpenSSL to consume memory, resulting in a denial of service.
(CVE-2014-3506)
Adam Langley discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory when
processing DTLS fragments. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to leak memory, resulting in a denial of service. This issue
only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
Red Hat
openssl: DTLS memory leak from zero-length fragments
vendor_redhat·2014-08-06·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3507 [MEDIUM] CWE-401 openssl: DTLS memory leak from zero-length fragments
openssl: DTLS memory leak from zero-length fragments
Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via zero-length DTLS fragments that trigger improper handling of the return value of a certain insert function.
A flaw was discovered in the way OpenSSL handled DTLS packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause a DTLS server or client using OpenSSL to crash or use excessive amounts of memory.
Statement: This did not affect openssl packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (based on upstream 0.9.8e) and openssl 1.0.0 packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (i.e. packages released before RHBA-2013:1585, which rebased openssl from
Debian
CVE-2014-3507: openssl - Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9....
vendor_debian·2014·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3507 [MEDIUM] CVE-2014-3507: openssl - Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9....
Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via zero-length DTLS fragments that trigger improper handling of the return value of a certain insert function.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1.0.1i-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1.0.1i-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1.0.1i-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1.0.1i-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1.0.1i-1)
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 mingw-openssl: various flaws [epel-7]
bugzilla·2014-08-07·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3505 [MEDIUM] CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 mingw-openssl: various flaws [epel-7]
CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 mingw-openssl: various flaws [epel-7]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
epel-7
Bugzilla
CVE-2014-3507 openssl: DTLS memory leak from zero-length fragments
bugzilla·2014-08-07·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3507 [MEDIUM] CVE-2014-3507 openssl: DTLS memory leak from zero-length fragments
CVE-2014-3507 openssl: DTLS memory leak from zero-length fragments
It was found that an attacker could force OpenSSL to leak memory and never free it via DTLS packets.
Discussion:
External References:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140806.txt
---
Upstream commit:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=d0a4b7d1a2948fce38515b8d862f43e7ba0ebf74
---
Created openssl tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1127704]
---
Created mingw-openssl tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1127705]
---
Created mingw-openssl tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1127709]
---
This did not affect openssl packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (based on upstream 0.9.8e) and openssl 1.0.0 packages in Red Hat Enterprise Lin
Bugzilla
CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 CVE-2014-3509 mingw-openssl: various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2014-08-07·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3505 [MEDIUM] CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 CVE-2014-3509 mingw-openssl: various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 CVE-2014-3509 mingw-openssl: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit mess
Bugzilla
CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 CVE-2014-3509 openssl: various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2014-08-07·CVSS 5.0
CVE-2014-3505 [MEDIUM] CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 CVE-2014-3509 openssl: various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2014-3505 CVE-2014-3506 CVE-2014-3507 CVE-2014-3511 CVE-2014-3510 CVE-2014-3508 CVE-2014-3509 openssl: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
Tenable
[R4] Tenable Products Affected by OpenSSL Protocol Downgrade Vulnerability
blogs_tenable·2014-08-21
[R4] Tenable Products Affected by OpenSSL Protocol Downgrade Vulnerability
## Cloud Exposure
Tenable Cloud Security (CNAPP) Request a demo
Tenable Cloud Vulnerability Management Request a demo
Tenable CIEM Request a demo
Secure your cloud
## Vulnerability Exposure
Tenable Vulnerability Management Try for free
Tenable Security Center Request a demo
Tenable Web App Scanning Try for free
Tenable Patch Management Request a demo
Tenable Enclave Security Request a demo
Tenable Attack Surface Management Request a demo
Tenable Nessus Try for free
## AI Exposure
Tenable AI Exposure Request a demo
## OT/IoT Exposure
Tenable OT Security Request a demo
## Identity Exposure
Tenable Identity Exposure Request a demo
## Business needs
Active Directory
AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)
AWS security
Azure security
Cloud Security Posture Man
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-008.txt.aschttp://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory10.aschttp://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1052.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-08/msg00036.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140853041709441&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=141077370928502&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142660345230545&w=2http://secunia.com/advisories/58962http://secunia.com/advisories/59700http://secunia.com/advisories/59710http://secunia.com/advisories/59743http://secunia.com/advisories/59756http://secunia.com/advisories/60022http://secunia.com/advisories/60221http://secunia.com/advisories/60493http://secunia.com/advisories/60684http://secunia.com/advisories/60778http://secunia.com/advisories/60803http://secunia.com/advisories/60824http://secunia.com/advisories/60917http://secunia.com/advisories/60921http://secunia.com/advisories/60938http://secunia.com/advisories/61017http://secunia.com/advisories/61040http://secunia.com/advisories/61100http://secunia.com/advisories/61184http://secunia.com/advisories/61250http://secunia.com/advisories/61775http://secunia.com/advisories/61959http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201412-39.xmlhttp://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/15000/500/sol15573.htmlhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1020240http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21682293http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21683389http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21686997http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2998http://www.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-372998.htmhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2014:158http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69078http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030693https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127502https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95161https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=d0a4b7d1a2948fce38515b8d862f43e7ba0ebf74https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10109https://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2014-September/000196.htmlhttps://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-14:18.openssl.aschttps://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140806.txtftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-008.txt.aschttp://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory10.aschttp://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1052.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-08/msg00036.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140853041709441&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=141077370928502&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142660345230545&w=2http://secunia.com/advisories/58962http://secunia.com/advisories/59700http://secunia.com/advisories/59710http://secunia.com/advisories/59743http://secunia.com/advisories/59756http://secunia.com/advisories/60022http://secunia.com/advisories/60221http://secunia.com/advisories/60493http://secunia.com/advisories/60684http://secunia.com/advisories/60778http://secunia.com/advisories/60803http://secunia.com/advisories/60824http://secunia.com/advisories/60917http://secunia.com/advisories/60921http://secunia.com/advisories/60938http://secunia.com/advisories/61017http://secunia.com/advisories/61040http://secunia.com/advisories/61100http://secunia.com/advisories/61184http://secunia.com/advisories/61250http://secunia.com/advisories/61775http://secunia.com/advisories/61959http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201412-39.xmlhttp://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/15000/500/sol15573.htmlhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1020240http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21682293http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21683389http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21686997http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2998http://www.huawei.com/en/security/psirt/security-bulletins/security-advisories/hw-372998.htmhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2014:158http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69078http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030693https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127502https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95161https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=d0a4b7d1a2948fce38515b8d862f43e7ba0ebf74https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10109https://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2014-September/000196.htmlhttps://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-14:18.openssl.aschttps://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140806.txt
2014-08-13
Published