CVE-2015-4446
published 2015-07-15CVE-2015-4446: Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat…
PriorityP340high7.5CVSS 2.0
AVNACLAuNCPIPAP
EPSS
5.07%
91.4th percentile
Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.008.20082 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and perform a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5090 and CVE-2015-5106.
Affected
12 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| adobe | acrobat | >= 10.0 < 10.1.15 | 10.1.15 |
| adobe | acrobat | 10.0 – 10.1.14 | — |
| adobe | acrobat | >= 11.0.0 < 11.0.12 | 11.0.12 |
| adobe | acrobat | 11.0.0 – 11.0.11 | — |
| adobe | acrobat_dc | >= 15.006.30033 < 15.006.30060 | 15.006.30060 |
| adobe | acrobat_dc | >= 15.007.20033 < 15.008.20082 | 15.008.20082 |
| adobe | acrobat_reader | >= 10.0 < 10.1.15 | 10.1.15 |
| adobe | acrobat_reader | 10.0 – 10.1.14 | — |
| adobe | acrobat_reader | >= 11.0.0 < 11.0.12 | 11.0.12 |
| adobe | acrobat_reader | 11.0.0 – 11.0.11 | — |
| adobe | acrobat_reader_dc | >= 15.006.30033 < 15.006.30060 | 15.006.30060 |
| adobe | acrobat_reader_dc | >= 15.007.20033 < 15.008.20082 | 15.008.20082 |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-vvvj-gwh5-mq4g: Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-13·CVSS 7.2
CVE-2015-4446 [HIGH] CWE-269 GHSA-vvvj-gwh5-mq4g: Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10
Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.008.20082 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and perform a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5090 and CVE-2015-5106.
GHSA
GHSA-5m3q-gvv2-4mx2: Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2015-5090 [HIGH] CWE-269 GHSA-5m3q-gvv2-4mx2: Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10
Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.008.20082 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and perform a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4446 and CVE-2015-5106.
GHSA
GHSA-x24m-9cvg-p9cr: Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2015-5106 [HIGH] CWE-269 GHSA-x24m-9cvg-p9cr: Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10
Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.008.20082 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and perform a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4446 and CVE-2015-5090.
Project0
Between a Rock and a Hard Link - Project Zero
project_zero·2015-12-01·CVSS 3.3
CVE-2015-4446 [LOW] Between a Rock and a Hard Link - Project Zero
Posted by James Forshaw, File System Enthusiast
In a previous blog post I described some of the changes that Microsoft has made to the handling of symbolic links from a sandboxed process. This has an impact on the exploitation of privileged file overwrites for sandbox escapes. Windows does support another method of linking files together, Hard Links, which have some similar properties to file level symbolic links but also some downsides. Hard Links were not originally banned from a sandbox so given the right vulnerability we can still develop an exploit. Of course in some circumstances Hard Links can also be useful for exploiting some types of system level privilege escalation. This short blog post describes the pros and cons of Hard Links as an exploitation primitive and demonstrates it
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
2015-07-15
Published