CVE-2016-0353
published 2016-11-24CVE-2016-0353: IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager 2.0 before 2.0.2 FP8, when Virtual Appliance is used, does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https…
PriorityP413low3.7CVSS 3.0
AVNACHPRNUINSUCLINAN
EPSS
0.88%
54.8th percentile
IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager 2.0 before 2.0.2 FP8, when Virtual Appliance is used, does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.
Affected
3 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| ibm | security_privileged_identity_manager | — | — |
| ibm | security_privileged_identity_manager | — | — |
| ibm | security_privileged_identity_manager | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.03.7LOWCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvdv2.04.3MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
CAPEC
Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
mitre_capec
[HIGH] Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
CAPEC-31: Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. There are several different forms of this attack. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the adversary to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the adversary before it is sent back to the server. Here the adversary seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.
Execution Flow:
Step 1 [Explore]: [Obtain co
2016-11-24
Published