CVE-2016-1286
published 2016-03-09CVE-2016-1286: named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via…
PriorityP358high8.6CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSCCNINAH
EPSS
62.10%
99.1th percentile
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted signature record for a DNAME record, related to db.c and resolver.c.
Affected
44 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| canonical | ubuntu_linux | — | — |
| canonical | ubuntu_linux | — | — |
| canonical | ubuntu_linux | — | — |
| debian | bind9 | < bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 (bookworm) | bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 (bookworm) |
| debian | debian_linux | — | — |
| debian | debian_linux | — | — |
| debian | debian_linux | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | >= 9.0.0 < 9.9.8 | 9.9.8 |
| isc | bind | >= 9.10.0 < 9.10.3 | 9.10.3 |
| isc | bind9 | >= 0 < 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 |
| isc | bind9 | >= 0 < 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 |
| isc | bind9 | >= 0 < 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 |
| isc | bind9 | >= 0 < 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6 |
| isc | bind9 | >= 0 < 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.8 | 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.8 |
| juniper | junos | — | — |
| juniper | junos | — | — |
| juniper | junos | — | — |
| juniper | junos | — | — |
| juniper | junos | — | — |
| juniper | junos | — | — |
Detection & IOCsextracted from sources · hover to see the quote
- →CVE-2016-1286 triggers an assertion failure in resolver.c or db.c when named parses a signature record (RRSIG) covering a DNAME record type in a recursive DNS response. Detection should focus on DNS responses containing an RRSIG record whose type-covered field is DNAME while the actual answer RR is of a different type. ↗
- →The attack pattern is: a DNS response contains an answer RR of any type other than DNAME, followed by an RRSIG record whose type-covered field is DNAME. This combination should be flagged in DNS traffic inspection. ↗
- →Fortinet IPS signature 'ISC.BIND.DNAME.Resource.Records.Parsing.DoS' can be used as a reference signature name for building equivalent detection rules in other IPS/IDS platforms. ↗
- ·Only BIND 9.x versions before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x versions before 9.10.3-P4 are vulnerable; patched versions are not affected. ↗
- ·The vulnerability is triggered via a crafted DNS *response* received by the BIND server (not a direct inbound query to the victim), so attack traffic originates from an attacker-controlled authoritative server upstream of the recursive resolver. ↗
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.18.6HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
osv8.6HIGH
vendor_debian8.6HIGH
vendor_redhat8.6HIGH
vendor_ubuntu6.8MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Red Hat
spice: Remote DoS via crafted message
vendor_redhat·2017-02-06·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-9578 [HIGH] CWE-1286 spice: Remote DoS via crafted message
spice: Remote DoS via crafted message
A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before 0.13.90 in the server's protocol handling. An attacker able to connect to the SPICE server could send crafted messages which would cause the process to crash.
A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE in the server's protocol handling. An attacker able to connect to the SPICE server could send crafted messages which would cause the process to crash.
Package: distribution (Red Hat Virtualization 4) - Affected
BSD
FreeBSD-SA-16:13.bind: Multiple BIND vulnerabilities
bsd_advisories·2016-03-10·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2016-1285 [MEDIUM] FreeBSD-SA-16:13.bind: Multiple BIND vulnerabilities
FreeBSD-SA-16:13.bind Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: Multiple BIND vulnerabilities
Category: contrib
Module: bind
Announced: 2016-03-10
Credits: ISC
Affects: FreeBSD 9.x
Corrected: 2016-03-10 07:47:55 UTC (stable/9, 9.3-STABLE)
2016-03-10 10:03:28 UTC (releng/9.3, 9.3-RELEASE-p38)
CVE Name: CVE-2016-1285, CVE-2016-1286
For general information regarding FreeBSD Security Advisories,
including descriptions of the fields above, security branches, and the
following sections, please visit .
I. Background
BIND 9 is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols.
The named(8) daemon is an Internet Domain Name Server.
II. Problem Description
Testing by ISC has uncovered a defect in control channel input handling
which can cause named to exit due to an assertion fai
Red Hat
bind: malformed signature records for DNAME records can trigger assertion failure
vendor_redhat·2016-03-09·CVSS 8.6
CVE-2016-1286 [HIGH] CWE-617 bind: malformed signature records for DNAME records can trigger assertion failure
bind: malformed signature records for DNAME records can trigger assertion failure
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted signature record for a DNAME record, related to db.c and resolver.c.
A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND parsed signature records for DNAME records. By sending a specially crafted query, a remote attacker could use this flaw to cause named to crash.
Package: bind (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4) - Will not fix
Ubuntu
Bind vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2016-03-09·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2016-1285 [MEDIUM] Bind vulnerabilities
Title: Bind vulnerabilities
Summary: Bind could be made to crash if it received specially crafted network
traffic.
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled input received by the rndc
control channel. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-1285)
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly parsed resource record signatures
for DNAME resource records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue
to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-1286)
Instructions: In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
Debian
CVE-2016-1286: bind9 - named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote ...
vendor_debian·2016·CVSS 8.6
CVE-2016-1286 [HIGH] CVE-2016-1286: bind9 - named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote ...
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted signature record for a DNAME record, related to db.c and resolver.c.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-6)
GHSA
GHSA-jj28-4744-gvh3: named in ISC BIND 9
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-17
CVE-2016-1286 [HIGH] CWE-20 GHSA-jj28-4744-gvh3: named in ISC BIND 9
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted signature record for a DNAME record, related to db.c and resolver.c.
OSV
CVE-2016-1286: named in ISC BIND 9
osv·2016-03-09·CVSS 8.6
CVE-2016-1286 [HIGH] CVE-2016-1286: named in ISC BIND 9
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted signature record for a DNAME record, related to db.c and resolver.c.
OSV
bind9 vulnerabilities
osv·2016-03-09·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2016-1285 [MEDIUM] bind9 vulnerabilities
bind9 vulnerabilities
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled input received by the rndc
control channel. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-1285)
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly parsed resource record signatures
for DNAME resource records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue
to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-1286)
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Fortinet
Internet In Danger: Analysis of ISC Bind Patch (part 2)
blogs_fortinet·2016-04-01·CVSS 8.6
CVE-2016-1286 [HIGH] Internet In Danger: Analysis of ISC Bind Patch (part 2)
FORTIGUARD LABS THREAT RESEARCH
Internet In Danger: Analysis of ISC Bind Patch (part 2)
By Amir Zali | April 01, 2016
In this second part article, we analyze two recent vulnerabilities in ISC BIND identified as CVE-2016-1286 and CVE-2016-2088. Based on advisories, these bugs can be triggered using a malformed DNAME record (CVE-2016-1286) or an OPT COOKIE records (CVE-2016-2088).
These two bugs share the same attack scenario that can only be triggered when a BIND server makes a request and then receives a malformed response. Based on this requirement, recursive servers are at highest risk to this attack, because it’s not straightforward to ask an authoritative-only server to make a DNS request.
CVE-2016-1286[1]
Named is a service daemon and part of the BIND application package. Named t
Fortinet
Internet In Danger: Analysis of ISC Bind Patch (part 1)
blogs_fortinet·2016-03-29·CVSS 6.8
[MEDIUM] Internet In Danger: Analysis of ISC Bind Patch (part 1)
FORTIGUARD LABS THREAT RESEARCH
Internet In Danger: Analysis of ISC Bind Patch (part 1)
By Dehui Yin | March 29, 2016
The Internet Systems Consortium just released a couple of days ago a new patch (version 9.10.3-P4) to fix some issues in the most popular DNS server software in the world.
The release note is available at https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01363/81/BIND-9.10.3-P4-Release-Notes.html
In this series of two articles, we will detail our investigation of these vulnerabilities and how we were able to protect our customers by deploying widely our detection.
ISC released a patch for the BIND rndc control channel DoS vulnerability (CVE-2016-1285). According to ISC, this vulnerability is due to an assertion failure in the application called named when it’s handling a malformed packet
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-1285 CVE-2016-1286 CVE-2016-2088 bind: various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-03-10·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2016-1285 [MEDIUM] CVE-2016-1285 CVE-2016-1286 CVE-2016-2088 bind: various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-1285 CVE-2016-1286 CVE-2016-2088 bind: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fed
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-1285 CVE-2016-1286 bind99: various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-03-10·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2016-1285 [MEDIUM] CVE-2016-1285 CVE-2016-1286 bind99: various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-1285 CVE-2016-1286 bind99: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While o
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-1286 bind: malformed signature records for DNAME records can trigger assertion failure
bugzilla·2016-03-08·CVSS 8.6
CVE-2016-1286 [HIGH] CVE-2016-1286 bind: malformed signature records for DNAME records can trigger assertion failure
CVE-2016-1286 bind: malformed signature records for DNAME records can trigger assertion failure
The following flaw, reported by ISC, was found in BIND:
An error when parsing signature records for DNAME records having specific properties can lead to named exiting due to an assertion failure in resolver.c or db.c.
An attacker able to cause a server to make a query deliberately chosen to generate a response containing a signature record which would exercise this vulnerability can cause named to stop execution with an assertion failure, resulting in denial of service to clients. Recursive resolvers are at the highest risk of vulnerability to this attack but authoritative-only servers may be also be vulnerable if the attacker can control the answers for records requested when the authoritati
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/181036.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/181037.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178831.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178880.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/179904.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/179911.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00046.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00053.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00070.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00072.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00075.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00079.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00084.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00013.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=146191105921542&w=2http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0562.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0601.htmlhttp://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3511http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjan2016-2867209.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinjul2016-3090546.htmlhttp://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035237http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2925-1https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05087821https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01353https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01380https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01438https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:13.bind.aschttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-07http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/181036.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/181037.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178831.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178880.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/179904.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/179911.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00046.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00053.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00070.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00072.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00075.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00079.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00084.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00013.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=146191105921542&w=2http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0562.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0601.htmlhttp://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3511http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjan2016-2867209.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinjul2016-3090546.htmlhttp://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035237http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2925-1https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05087821https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01353https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01380https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01438https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:13.bind.aschttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-07
2016-03-09
Published