CVE-2016-2177
published 2016-06-20CVE-2016-2177: OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service…
PriorityP357critical9.8CVSS 3.0
AVNACLPRNUINSUCHIHAH
EPSS
44.51%
98.6th percentile
OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c.
Affected
50 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | openssl | < openssl 1.0.2i-1 (bookworm) | openssl 1.0.2i-1 (bookworm) |
| hp | icewall_mcrp | — | — |
| hp | icewall_sso | — | — |
| hp | icewall_sso_agent_option | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.09.8CRITICALCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv2.07.5HIGHAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
osv9.8CRITICAL
vendor_debian9.8LOW
vendor_redhat9.8CRITICAL
vendor_ubuntu9.8CRITICAL
vendor_cisco5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Palo Alto
PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
vendor_paloalto·2024-11-07·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2014-0195 [MEDIUM] PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
The Palo Alto Networks Product Security Assurance team has evaluated the following open source software (OSS) CVEs as they relate to Cortex XDR Agent. While Cortex XDR Agent may include the
CVEs: CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-3509, CVE-2014-3512, CVE-2014-3513, CVE-2014-3567, CVE-2015-0209, CVE-2015-0292, CVE-2015-1789, CVE-2015-1791, CVE-2015-1793, CVE-2015-3194, CVE-2016-0705, CVE-2016-0797, CVE-2016-0798, CVE-2016-0799, CVE-2016-2105, CVE-2016-2106, CVE-2016-2108, CVE-2016-2109, CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2177, CVE-2016-2179, CVE-2016-2180, CVE-2016-2181, CVE-2016-2182, CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6302, CVE-2016-6303, CVE-2016-6304, CVE-2019-1551, CVE-2019-1552, CVE-2019-1559, CVE-2019-1563, CVE-2020-196
CISA ICS
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
cisa_ics·2022-12-19
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
## Archived Content In an effort to keep CISA.gov current, the archive contains outdated information that may not reflect current policy or programs.
ICS Advisory
##
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
Last RevisedDecember 19, 2022
Alert CodeICSA-22-349-21
## 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- CVSS v3 9.8
- ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity/public exploits are available
- Vendor: Siemens
- Equipment: SCALANCE X-200RNA switch devices before V3.2.7
- Vulnerabilities: Observable Timing Discrepancy; Race Condition; Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer; Improper Input Validation; NULL Pointer Dereference; Use After Free; Cryptographic Issues; Comparison of Incompatible Types; Resource Management
CISA ICS
Schneider Electric Floating License Manager
cisa_ics·2018-05-24·CVSS 7.8
[HIGH] Schneider Electric Floating License Manager
## Archived Content In an effort to keep CISA.gov current, the archive contains outdated information that may not reflect current policy or programs.
ICS Advisory
##
Schneider Electric Floating License Manager
Last RevisedMay 24, 2018
Alert CodeICSA-18-144-01
## 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-
CVSS v3 9.8
- ATTENTION: Remotely exploitable/low skill level to exploit
- Vendor: Schneider Electric
- Equipment: Floating License Manager
- Vulnerabilities: Heap-based Buffer Overflow, Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer, Open Redirect
## 2. RISK EVALUATION
Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could cause a denial of service, allow arbitrary execution of code with system level privileges, or send users to
Ubuntu
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2017-01-31·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Title: OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in OpenSSL.
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue only applied to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS as other
releases were fixed in a previous security update. (CVE-2016-2177)
It was discovered that OpenSSL did not properly handle Montgomery
multiplication, resulting in incorrect results leading to transient
failures. This issue only applied to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 16.10.
(CVE-2016-7055)
It was discovered that OpenSSL did not properly use constant-time
operations when performing ECDSA P-256 signing. A remote attacker could
Cisco
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
vendor_cisco·2016-09-27·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2016-2177 [MEDIUM] CWE-119 Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
On September 22, 2016, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an advisory that describes 14 vulnerabilities. Of these 14 vulnerabilities, the OpenSSL Software Foundation classifies one as “Critical Severity,” one as “Moderate Severity,” and the other 12 as “Low Severity.”
Subsequently, on September 26, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an additional advisory that describes two new vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities affect the OpenSSL versions that were released to address the vulnerabilities disclosed in the previous advisory. One of the new vulnerabilities was rated as “High Severity” and the other as “Moderate Severity.”
Of the 16 released vulnerabilities:
Fourteen track issues that could resu
Ubuntu
OpenSSL regression
vendor_ubuntu·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2182 [CRITICAL] OpenSSL regression
Title: OpenSSL regression
Summary: USN-3087-1 introduced a regression in OpenSSL.
USN-3087-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was
incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update
fixes the problem.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Original advisory details:
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in t
BSD
FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
bsd_advisories·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Category: contrib
Module: openssl
Announced: 2016-09-23; revised on 2016-09-26
Credits: OpenSSL Project
Affects: All supported versions of FreeBSD.
Corrected: 2016-09-22 14:57:48 UTC (stable/11, 11.0-STABLE)
2016-09-22 15:55:27 UTC (releng/11.0, 11.0-RELEASE)
2016-09-22 15:05:38 UTC (stable/10, 10.3-STABLE)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.3, 10.3-RELEASE-p9)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.2, 10.2-RELEASE-p22)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.1, 10.1-RELEASE-p39)
2016-09-26 08:19:33 UTC (stable/9, 9.3-STABLE)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/9.3, 9.3-RELEASE-p47)
CVE Name: CVE-2016-2177, CVE-2016-2178, CVE-2016-2179, CVE-2016-2180,
CVE-2016-2181, CVE-2016-2182, CVE-2016-6302, CVE
Ubuntu
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2016-09-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Title: OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in OpenSSL.
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Yuval Yarom discovered that OpenSSL
did not properly use constant-time operations when performing DSA signing.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perf
Red Hat
openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase
vendor_redhat·2016-05-05·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CWE-190 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase
openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase
OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c.
Multiple integer overflow flaws were found in the way OpenSSL performed pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use these flaws to cause a TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL to crash.
Package: openssl (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Will not fix
Package: openssl097a (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Will not fix
Package: openssl098e (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6) - Will not fix
Package: o
Debian
CVE-2016-2177: openssl - OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer bound...
vendor_debian·2016·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CVE-2016-2177: openssl - OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer bound...
OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
Cisco
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
vendor_cisco
CVE-2016-2177 Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
CVE-2016-2177: Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
On September 22, 2016, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an advisory that describes 14 vulnerabilities. Of these 14 vulnerabilities, the OpenSSL Software Foundation classifies one as “Critical Severity,” one as “Moderate Severity,” and the other 12 as “Low Severity.” Subsequently, on September 26, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an additional advisory that describes two new vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities affect the OpenSSL versions that were released to address the vulnerabilities disclosed in the previous advisory. One of the new vulnerabilities was rated as “High Severity” and the other as “Moderate Severity.” Of the 16 released vulnerabilities: Fourteen track issues that c
GHSA
GHSA-pgwh-48cm-wrqw: OpenSSL through 1
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-13
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CWE-190 GHSA-pgwh-48cm-wrqw: OpenSSL through 1
OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c.
OSV
openssl vulnerabilities
osv·2017-01-31·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] openssl vulnerabilities
openssl vulnerabilities
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue only applied to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS as other
releases were fixed in a previous security update. (CVE-2016-2177)
It was discovered that OpenSSL did not properly handle Montgomery
multiplication, resulting in incorrect results leading to transient
failures. This issue only applied to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 16.10.
(CVE-2016-7055)
It was discovered that OpenSSL did not properly use constant-time
operations when performing ECDSA P-256 signing. A remote attacker could
possibly use this issue to perform a timing attack and recover
OSV
openssl regression
osv·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2182 [CRITICAL] openssl regression
openssl regression
USN-3087-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was
incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update
fixes the problem.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Original advisory details:
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Y
OSV
openssl vulnerabilities
osv·2016-09-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-6304 [CRITICAL] openssl vulnerabilities
openssl vulnerabilities
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Yuval Yarom discovered that OpenSSL
did not properly use constant-time operations when performing DSA signing.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a cache-timing
attack and recover private DSA keys. (CVE-201
OSV
CVE-2016-2177: OpenSSL through 1
osv·2016-06-20·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CVE-2016-2177: OpenSSL through 1
OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
bugzilla·2016-11-02·CVSS 9.8
[CRITICAL] RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
Description of problem:
atomic scan found a CVE bug in registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7/cockpit-ws:latest(b43b419e).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host release 7.3
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# atomic host status
State: idle
Deployments:
● rhel-atomic-host-ostree:rhel-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
Version: 7.3 (2016-10-26 14:24:09)
Commit: 90c9735becfff1c55c8586ae0f2c904bc0928f042cd4d016e9e0e2edd16e5e97
OSName: rhel-atomic-host
Unlocked: development
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# rpm -q atomic
atomic-1.13.6-1.el7.x86_64
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7/o
HackerOne
CVE-2016-2177 Undefined pointer arithmetic in SSL code
hackerone·2016-09-20·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CVE-2016-2177 Undefined pointer arithmetic in SSL code
CVE-2016-2177 Undefined pointer arithmetic in SSL code
1.0.2 version here:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a004e72b95835136d3f1ea90517f706c24c03da7
1.0.1 version here:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6f35f6deb5ca7daebe289f86477e061ce3ee5f46
```
These will get listed in the next security advisory and rolled up in the next release whenever that is.
```
according to the OpenSSL team.
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/06/27/undefined-pointer-arithmetic/
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase
bugzilla·2016-06-01·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase
CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase
A common idiom in the codebase is:
if (p + len > limit)
{
return; /* Too long */
}
where p points to some malloc'd data of SIZE bytes and limit == p + SIZE. 'len' could be from some externally supplied data, e.g. TLS message. This idiom is vulnerable to integer overflow vulnerability.
Discussion:
Created openssl101e tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: epel-5 [bug 1341708]
---
Created openssl tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1341706]
---
Created mingw-openssl tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1341707]
---
Upstream fix for 1.0.2 (only Fedora-23 and mingw packages in Fedora-23/Epel-7):
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a004e72b95835136d3f1ea90517f70
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2177 openssl101e: openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [epel-5]
bugzilla·2016-06-01·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CVE-2016-2177 openssl101e: openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [epel-5]
CVE-2016-2177 openssl101e: openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [epel-5]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
[bug automatically created by:
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2177 mingw-openssl: openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-06-01·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CVE-2016-2177 mingw-openssl: openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-2177 mingw-openssl: openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects mult
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-06-01·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported
Tenable
[R7] Nessus 6.9 Fixes Multiple Vulnerabilities
blogs_tenable·2016-10-25
[R7] Nessus 6.9 Fixes Multiple Vulnerabilities
## Cloud Exposure
Tenable Cloud Security (CNAPP) Request a demo
Tenable Cloud Vulnerability Management Request a demo
Tenable CIEM Request a demo
Secure your cloud
## Vulnerability Exposure
Tenable Vulnerability Management Try for free
Tenable Security Center Request a demo
Tenable Web App Scanning Try for free
Tenable Patch Management Request a demo
Tenable Enclave Security Request a demo
Tenable Attack Surface Management Request a demo
Tenable Nessus Try for free
## AI Exposure
Tenable AI Exposure Request a demo
## OT/IoT Exposure
Tenable OT Security Request a demo
## Identity Exposure
Tenable Identity Exposure Request a demo
## Business needs
Active Directory
AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)
AWS security
Azure security
Cloud Security Posture Man
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00012.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00029.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00010.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00032.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/31http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160927-opensslhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3673http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20170322-01-openssl-enhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/08/9http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540957/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/540957/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91319http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036088http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSVhttp://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUEhttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3087-1http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3087-2http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3181-1https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0193https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0194https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1658https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa132https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341705https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdfhttps://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a004e72b95835136d3f1ea90517f706c24c03da7https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-c05302448https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03763en_ushttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05302448https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-18-144-01https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10165https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10215https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl.aschttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-16https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K23873366https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03856en_ushttps://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03856en_ushttps://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/1749-security-advisory-24https://www.citect.schneider-electric.com/safety-and-security-central/36-security-notifications/9134-vulnerabilities-within-schneider-electric-floating-license-managerhttps://www.schneider-electric.com/en/download/document/SEVD-2018-137-01/https://www.schneider-electric.com/en/download/document/SEVD-2018-144-01/https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00012.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00029.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00010.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00032.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/31http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160927-opensslhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3673http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20170322-01-openssl-enhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/08/9http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/540957/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/540957/100/0/threadedhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91319http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036088http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSVhttp://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUEhttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3087-1
+ 28 more references
2016-06-20
Published