CVE-2016-2181
published 2016-09-16CVE-2016-2181: The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence…
PriorityP347high7.5CVSS 3.0
AVNACLPRNUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
22.63%
97.5th percentile
The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c.
Affected
42 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | openssl | < openssl 1.0.2i-1 (bookworm) | openssl 1.0.2i-1 (bookworm) |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.07.5HIGHCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
osv9.8CRITICAL
vendor_ubuntu9.8CRITICAL
vendor_debian7.5HIGH
vendor_redhat7.5HIGH
vendor_cisco5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Palo Alto
PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
vendor_paloalto·2024-11-07·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2014-0195 [MEDIUM] PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
The Palo Alto Networks Product Security Assurance team has evaluated the following open source software (OSS) CVEs as they relate to Cortex XDR Agent. While Cortex XDR Agent may include the
CVEs: CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-3509, CVE-2014-3512, CVE-2014-3513, CVE-2014-3567, CVE-2015-0209, CVE-2015-0292, CVE-2015-1789, CVE-2015-1791, CVE-2015-1793, CVE-2015-3194, CVE-2016-0705, CVE-2016-0797, CVE-2016-0798, CVE-2016-0799, CVE-2016-2105, CVE-2016-2106, CVE-2016-2108, CVE-2016-2109, CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2177, CVE-2016-2179, CVE-2016-2180, CVE-2016-2181, CVE-2016-2182, CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6302, CVE-2016-6303, CVE-2016-6304, CVE-2019-1551, CVE-2019-1552, CVE-2019-1559, CVE-2019-1563, CVE-2020-196
CISA ICS
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
cisa_ics·2022-12-19
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
## Archived Content In an effort to keep CISA.gov current, the archive contains outdated information that may not reflect current policy or programs.
ICS Advisory
##
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
Last RevisedDecember 19, 2022
Alert CodeICSA-22-349-21
## 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- CVSS v3 9.8
- ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity/public exploits are available
- Vendor: Siemens
- Equipment: SCALANCE X-200RNA switch devices before V3.2.7
- Vulnerabilities: Observable Timing Discrepancy; Race Condition; Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer; Improper Input Validation; NULL Pointer Dereference; Use After Free; Cryptographic Issues; Comparison of Incompatible Types; Resource Management
Cisco
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
vendor_cisco·2016-09-27·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2016-2177 [MEDIUM] CWE-119 Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
On September 22, 2016, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an advisory that describes 14 vulnerabilities. Of these 14 vulnerabilities, the OpenSSL Software Foundation classifies one as “Critical Severity,” one as “Moderate Severity,” and the other 12 as “Low Severity.”
Subsequently, on September 26, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an additional advisory that describes two new vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities affect the OpenSSL versions that were released to address the vulnerabilities disclosed in the previous advisory. One of the new vulnerabilities was rated as “High Severity” and the other as “Moderate Severity.”
Of the 16 released vulnerabilities:
Fourteen track issues that could resu
Ubuntu
OpenSSL regression
vendor_ubuntu·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2182 [CRITICAL] OpenSSL regression
Title: OpenSSL regression
Summary: USN-3087-1 introduced a regression in OpenSSL.
USN-3087-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was
incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update
fixes the problem.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Original advisory details:
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in t
BSD
FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
bsd_advisories·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Category: contrib
Module: openssl
Announced: 2016-09-23; revised on 2016-09-26
Credits: OpenSSL Project
Affects: All supported versions of FreeBSD.
Corrected: 2016-09-22 14:57:48 UTC (stable/11, 11.0-STABLE)
2016-09-22 15:55:27 UTC (releng/11.0, 11.0-RELEASE)
2016-09-22 15:05:38 UTC (stable/10, 10.3-STABLE)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.3, 10.3-RELEASE-p9)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.2, 10.2-RELEASE-p22)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.1, 10.1-RELEASE-p39)
2016-09-26 08:19:33 UTC (stable/9, 9.3-STABLE)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/9.3, 9.3-RELEASE-p47)
CVE Name: CVE-2016-2177, CVE-2016-2178, CVE-2016-2179, CVE-2016-2180,
CVE-2016-2181, CVE-2016-2182, CVE-2016-6302, CVE
Ubuntu
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2016-09-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Title: OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in OpenSSL.
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Yuval Yarom discovered that OpenSSL
did not properly use constant-time operations when performing DSA signing.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perf
Red Hat
openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection
vendor_redhat·2016-07-05·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] CWE-20 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection
openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection
The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c.
A flaw was found in the Datagram TLS (DTLS) replay protection implementation in OpenSSL. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to make a DTLS server using OpenSSL to reject further packets sent from a DTLS client over an established DTLS connection.
Package: openssl (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Will not fix
Package: openssl097a (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Not affected
Package: open
Debian
CVE-2016-2181: openssl - The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 misha...
vendor_debian·2016·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] CVE-2016-2181: openssl - The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 misha...
The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
Cisco
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
vendor_cisco
CVE-2016-2181 Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
CVE-2016-2181: Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
On September 22, 2016, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an advisory that describes 14 vulnerabilities. Of these 14 vulnerabilities, the OpenSSL Software Foundation classifies one as “Critical Severity,” one as “Moderate Severity,” and the other 12 as “Low Severity.” Subsequently, on September 26, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an additional advisory that describes two new vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities affect the OpenSSL versions that were released to address the vulnerabilities disclosed in the previous advisory. One of the new vulnerabilities was rated as “High Severity” and the other as “Moderate Severity.” Of the 16 released vulnerabilities: Fourteen track issues that c
GHSA
GHSA-mpfh-46p6-w5g3: The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-13
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] GHSA-mpfh-46p6-w5g3: The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1
The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c.
OSV
openssl regression
osv·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2182 [CRITICAL] openssl regression
openssl regression
USN-3087-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was
incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update
fixes the problem.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Original advisory details:
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Y
OSV
openssl vulnerabilities
osv·2016-09-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-6304 [CRITICAL] openssl vulnerabilities
openssl vulnerabilities
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Yuval Yarom discovered that OpenSSL
did not properly use constant-time operations when performing DSA signing.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a cache-timing
attack and recover private DSA keys. (CVE-201
OSV
CVE-2016-2181: The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1
osv·2016-09-16·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] CVE-2016-2181: The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1
The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
bugzilla·2016-11-02·CVSS 9.8
[CRITICAL] RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
Description of problem:
atomic scan found a CVE bug in registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7/cockpit-ws:latest(b43b419e).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host release 7.3
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# atomic host status
State: idle
Deployments:
● rhel-atomic-host-ostree:rhel-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
Version: 7.3 (2016-10-26 14:24:09)
Commit: 90c9735becfff1c55c8586ae0f2c904bc0928f042cd4d016e9e0e2edd16e5e97
OSName: rhel-atomic-host
Unlocked: development
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# rpm -q atomic
atomic-1.13.6-1.el7.x86_64
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7/o
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2181 mingw-openssl: openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-08-22·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] CVE-2016-2181 mingw-openssl: openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-2181 mingw-openssl: openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue af
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection
bugzilla·2016-08-22·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection
CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection
It was found that when doing handshake/renegotiation, it's possible to bypass DTLS replay protection by sending a record for the next epoch (which does not have to decrypt or have a valid MAC), with a very large sequence number. This means the right hand edge of the window is moved very far to the right, and all subsequent legitimate packets are dropped causing a denial of service.
Upstream patches:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5802758eb480c5f14a768f6a061df1dd20aec8c4
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b77ab018b79a00f789b0fb85596b446b08be4c9d
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fa75569758298e2930c78989b516cac937118acc
Discussion:
Created openssl101e tracking bugs for this
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-08-22·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-2181 openssl101e: openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [epel-5]
bugzilla·2016-08-22·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-2181 [HIGH] CVE-2016-2181 openssl101e: openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [epel-5]
CVE-2016-2181 openssl101e: openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass via sending large sequence number [epel-5]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
[bug automatically c
Bugzilla
CVE-2015-2181 CVE-2015-8864 CVE-2016-4068 CVE-2016-4069 roundcubemail: security issues fixed in version 1.0.9
bugzilla·2016-04-25·CVSS 8.8
CVE-2015-2181 [HIGH] CVE-2015-2181 CVE-2015-8864 CVE-2016-4068 CVE-2016-4069 roundcubemail: security issues fixed in version 1.0.9
CVE-2015-2181 CVE-2015-8864 CVE-2016-4068 CVE-2016-4069 roundcubemail: security issues fixed in version 1.0.9
Three issues were fixed in roundcubemail 1.0.9:
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.0.9
(CVE-2015-8864,CVE-2016-4068) Fix XSS issue in SVG images handling (#4949):
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/issues/4949
(CVE-2016-4069) Protect download urls against CSRF using unique request tokens (#4957):
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/issues/4957
(CVE-2015-2181) Fix (again) security issue in DBMail driver of password plugin (#4958):
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/issues/4958
Discussion:
Created roundcubemail tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1330085]
Affects: epel-all [bug 1330086]
---
roundcubemail-1.
Tenable
[R7] Nessus 6.9 Fixes Multiple Vulnerabilities
blogs_tenable·2016-10-25
[R7] Nessus 6.9 Fixes Multiple Vulnerabilities
## Cloud Exposure
Tenable Cloud Security (CNAPP) Request a demo
Tenable Cloud Vulnerability Management Request a demo
Tenable CIEM Request a demo
Secure your cloud
## Vulnerability Exposure
Tenable Vulnerability Management Try for free
Tenable Security Center Request a demo
Tenable Web App Scanning Try for free
Tenable Patch Management Request a demo
Tenable Enclave Security Request a demo
Tenable Attack Surface Management Request a demo
Tenable Nessus Try for free
## AI Exposure
Tenable AI Exposure Request a demo
## OT/IoT Exposure
Tenable OT Security Request a demo
## Identity Exposure
Tenable Identity Exposure Request a demo
## Business needs
Active Directory
AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)
AWS security
Azure security
Cloud Security Posture Man
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00012.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00029.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00010.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00032.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/31http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3673http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20170322-01-openssl-enhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92982http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036690http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSVhttp://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUEhttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3087-1http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3087-2https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa132https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdfhttps://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=1fb9fdc3027b27d8eb6a1e6a846435b070980770https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10215https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl.aschttps://support.f5.com/csp/article/K59298921https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/1749-security-advisory-24https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00012.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00029.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00010.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00032.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.htmlhttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/31http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3673http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20170322-01-openssl-enhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92982http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036690http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSVhttp://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUEhttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3087-1http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3087-2https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa132https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdfhttps://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=1fb9fdc3027b27d8eb6a1e6a846435b070980770https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10215https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl.aschttps://support.f5.com/csp/article/K59298921https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/1749-security-advisory-24https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21
2016-09-16
Published