CVE-2016-5128
published 2016-07-23CVE-2016-5128: objects.cc in Google V8 before 5.2.361.27, as used in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82, does not prevent API interceptors from modifying a store target…
PriorityP337high8.8CVSS 3.0
AVNACLPRNUIRSUCHIHAH
EPSS
1.29%
66.9th percentile
objects.cc in Google V8 before 5.2.361.27, as used in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82, does not prevent API interceptors from modifying a store target without setting a property, which allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted web site.
Affected
2 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| chrome | <= 51.0.2704.106 | — | |
| v8 | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.08.8HIGHCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv2.06.8MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
osv8.8HIGH
vendor_redhat8.8HIGH
vendor_ubuntu8.8HIGH
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Ubuntu
Oxide vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2016-08-05·CVSS 8.8
CVE-2016-1705 [HIGH] Oxide vulnerabilities
Title: Oxide vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in Oxide.
Multiple security issues were discovered in Chromium. If a user were
tricked in to opening a specially crafted website, an attacker could
potentially exploit these to read uninitialized memory, cause a denial
of service (application crash) or execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2016-1705)
It was discovered that the PPAPI implementation does not validate the
origin of IPC messages to the plugin broker process. A remote attacker
could potentially exploit this to bypass sandbox protection mechanisms.
(CVE-2016-1706)
It was discovered that Blink does not prevent window creation by a
deferred frame. A remote attacker could potentially exploit this to bypass
same origin restrictions. (CVE-2016-1710)
It was discovere
Red Hat
chromium-browser: same-origin bypass in v8
vendor_redhat·2016-07-20·CVSS 8.8
CVE-2016-5128 [HIGH] chromium-browser: same-origin bypass in v8
chromium-browser: same-origin bypass in v8
objects.cc in Google V8 before 5.2.361.27, as used in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82, does not prevent API interceptors from modifying a store target without setting a property, which allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted web site.
Project0
2022 0-day In-the-Wild Exploitation…so far - Project Zero
project_zero·2022-06-01·CVSS 8.8
CVE-2016-5128 [HIGH] 2022 0-day In-the-Wild Exploitation…so far - Project Zero
Posted by Maddie Stone, Google Project Zero
This blog post is an overview of a talk, “ 0-day In-the-Wild Exploitation in 2022…so far”, that I gave at the FIRST conference in June 2022. The slides are available here.
For the last three years, we’ve published annual year-in-review reports of 0-days found exploited in the wild. The most recent of these reports is the 2021 Year in Review report, which we published just a few months ago in April. While we plan to stick with that annual cadence, we’re publishing a little bonus report today looking at the in-the-wild 0-days detected and disclosed in the first half of 2022.
As of June 15, 2022, there have been 18 0-days detected and disclosed as exploited in-the-wild in 2022. When we analyzed those 0-days, we found that at least nin
GHSA
GHSA-m7hw-q27f-4w7w: objects
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-17
CVE-2016-5128 [HIGH] GHSA-m7hw-q27f-4w7w: objects
objects.cc in Google V8 before 5.2.361.27, as used in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82, does not prevent API interceptors from modifying a store target without setting a property, which allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted web site.
OSV
oxide-qt vulnerabilities
osv·2016-08-05·CVSS 8.8
CVE-2016-1705 [HIGH] oxide-qt vulnerabilities
oxide-qt vulnerabilities
Multiple security issues were discovered in Chromium. If a user were
tricked in to opening a specially crafted website, an attacker could
potentially exploit these to read uninitialized memory, cause a denial
of service (application crash) or execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2016-1705)
It was discovered that the PPAPI implementation does not validate the
origin of IPC messages to the plugin broker process. A remote attacker
could potentially exploit this to bypass sandbox protection mechanisms.
(CVE-2016-1706)
It was discovered that Blink does not prevent window creation by a
deferred frame. A remote attacker could potentially exploit this to bypass
same origin restrictions. (CVE-2016-1710)
It was discovered that Blink does not disable frame navigation during a
det
OSV
CVE-2016-5128: objects
osv·2016-07-23·CVSS 8.8
CVE-2016-5128 [HIGH] CVE-2016-5128: objects
objects.cc in Google V8 before 5.2.361.27, as used in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82, does not prevent API interceptors from modifying a store target without setting a property, which allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted web site.
Project0
Project Zero RCA: CVE-2022-1096: Chrome Type Confusion in Property Access Interceptor
project_zero·CVSS 8.8
CVE-2022-1096 [HIGH] Project Zero RCA: CVE-2022-1096: Chrome Type Confusion in Property Access Interceptor
# CVE-2022-1096: Chrome Type Confusion in Property Access Interceptor
## The Basics
**Disclosure or Patch Date:** 25 March 2022
**Product:** Google Chromium
**Advisory:** https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2022/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_25.html
**Affected Versions:** pre 99.0.4844.84
**First Patched Version:** 99.0.4844.84
**Issue/Bug Report:** https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1309225
**Patch CL:** https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/0981e91a4f8692af337e2588562ad1504f4bffdc
**Bug-Introducing CL:** N/A
**Reporter(s):** Anonymous
## The Code
**Proof-of-concept:**
```
style = document.createElement('p').style;
style.prop = { toString: () => {
style.prop = 1;
}};
```
**Exploit sample:** N/A
**Access to the exploit sample?** No
## The Vu
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/07/stable-channel-update.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00020.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00021.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00022.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00028.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1485.htmlhttp://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3637http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92053http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036428http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3041-1https://codereview.chromium.org/2082633002https://codereview.chromium.org/2084183004https://codereview.chromium.org/2085223002https://codereview.chromium.org/2101983002https://codereview.chromium.org/2103033002https://crbug.com/619166https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-09http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/07/stable-channel-update.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00020.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00021.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00022.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00028.htmlhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1485.htmlhttp://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3637http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92053http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036428http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3041-1https://codereview.chromium.org/2082633002https://codereview.chromium.org/2084183004https://codereview.chromium.org/2085223002https://codereview.chromium.org/2101983002https://codereview.chromium.org/2103033002https://crbug.com/619166https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-09
2016-07-23
Published