CVE-2016-6302
published 2016-09-16CVE-2016-6302: The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows…
PriorityP347high7.5CVSS 3.0
AVNACLPRNUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
27.81%
98.1th percentile
The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short.
Affected
44 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | openssl | < openssl 1.0.2i-1 (bookworm) | openssl 1.0.2i-1 (bookworm) |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
| openssl | openssl | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.07.5HIGHCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
osv9.8CRITICAL
vendor_ubuntu9.8CRITICAL
vendor_debian7.5HIGH
vendor_redhat7.5HIGH
vendor_cisco5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Palo Alto
PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
vendor_paloalto·2024-11-07·CVSS 6.8
CVE-2014-0195 [MEDIUM] PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
PAN-SA-2024-0014 Informational Bulletin: Impact of OSS CVEs in Cortex XDR Agent
The Palo Alto Networks Product Security Assurance team has evaluated the following open source software (OSS) CVEs as they relate to Cortex XDR Agent. While Cortex XDR Agent may include the
CVEs: CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-3509, CVE-2014-3512, CVE-2014-3513, CVE-2014-3567, CVE-2015-0209, CVE-2015-0292, CVE-2015-1789, CVE-2015-1791, CVE-2015-1793, CVE-2015-3194, CVE-2016-0705, CVE-2016-0797, CVE-2016-0798, CVE-2016-0799, CVE-2016-2105, CVE-2016-2106, CVE-2016-2108, CVE-2016-2109, CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2177, CVE-2016-2179, CVE-2016-2180, CVE-2016-2181, CVE-2016-2182, CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6302, CVE-2016-6303, CVE-2016-6304, CVE-2019-1551, CVE-2019-1552, CVE-2019-1559, CVE-2019-1563, CVE-2020-196
CISA ICS
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
cisa_ics·2022-12-19
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
## Archived Content In an effort to keep CISA.gov current, the archive contains outdated information that may not reflect current policy or programs.
ICS Advisory
##
Siemens SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices
Last RevisedDecember 19, 2022
Alert CodeICSA-22-349-21
## 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- CVSS v3 9.8
- ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity/public exploits are available
- Vendor: Siemens
- Equipment: SCALANCE X-200RNA switch devices before V3.2.7
- Vulnerabilities: Observable Timing Discrepancy; Race Condition; Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer; Improper Input Validation; NULL Pointer Dereference; Use After Free; Cryptographic Issues; Comparison of Incompatible Types; Resource Management
Cisco
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
vendor_cisco·2016-09-27·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2016-2177 [MEDIUM] CWE-119 Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
On September 22, 2016, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an advisory that describes 14 vulnerabilities. Of these 14 vulnerabilities, the OpenSSL Software Foundation classifies one as “Critical Severity,” one as “Moderate Severity,” and the other 12 as “Low Severity.”
Subsequently, on September 26, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an additional advisory that describes two new vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities affect the OpenSSL versions that were released to address the vulnerabilities disclosed in the previous advisory. One of the new vulnerabilities was rated as “High Severity” and the other as “Moderate Severity.”
Of the 16 released vulnerabilities:
Fourteen track issues that could resu
Ubuntu
OpenSSL regression
vendor_ubuntu·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2182 [CRITICAL] OpenSSL regression
Title: OpenSSL regression
Summary: USN-3087-1 introduced a regression in OpenSSL.
USN-3087-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was
incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update
fixes the problem.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Original advisory details:
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in t
BSD
FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
bsd_advisories·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: Multiple OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Category: contrib
Module: openssl
Announced: 2016-09-23; revised on 2016-09-26
Credits: OpenSSL Project
Affects: All supported versions of FreeBSD.
Corrected: 2016-09-22 14:57:48 UTC (stable/11, 11.0-STABLE)
2016-09-22 15:55:27 UTC (releng/11.0, 11.0-RELEASE)
2016-09-22 15:05:38 UTC (stable/10, 10.3-STABLE)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.3, 10.3-RELEASE-p9)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.2, 10.2-RELEASE-p22)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/10.1, 10.1-RELEASE-p39)
2016-09-26 08:19:33 UTC (stable/9, 9.3-STABLE)
2016-09-26 08:21:29 UTC (releng/9.3, 9.3-RELEASE-p47)
CVE Name: CVE-2016-2177, CVE-2016-2178, CVE-2016-2179, CVE-2016-2180,
CVE-2016-2181, CVE-2016-2182, CVE-2016-6302, CVE
Ubuntu
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2016-09-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2177 [CRITICAL] OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Title: OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in OpenSSL.
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Yuval Yarom discovered that OpenSSL
did not properly use constant-time operations when performing DSA signing.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perf
Red Hat
openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks
vendor_redhat·2016-08-23·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CWE-190 openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks
openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks
The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short.
An integer underflow flaw leading to a buffer over-read was found in the way OpenSSL parsed TLS session tickets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash a TLS server using OpenSSL if it used SHA-512 as HMAC for session tickets.
Package: openssl (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Not affected
Package: openssl097a (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Not affected
Package: openssl098e (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6) - Not affected
Package: openssl098e (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7) - Not affected
Package
Debian
CVE-2016-6302: openssl - The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not...
vendor_debian·2016·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CVE-2016-6302: openssl - The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not...
The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1.0.2i-1)
Cisco
Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
vendor_cisco
CVE-2016-6302 Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
CVE-2016-6302: Multiple Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: September 2016
On September 22, 2016, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an advisory that describes 14 vulnerabilities. Of these 14 vulnerabilities, the OpenSSL Software Foundation classifies one as “Critical Severity,” one as “Moderate Severity,” and the other 12 as “Low Severity.” Subsequently, on September 26, the OpenSSL Software Foundation released an additional advisory that describes two new vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities affect the OpenSSL versions that were released to address the vulnerabilities disclosed in the previous advisory. One of the new vulnerabilities was rated as “High Severity” and the other as “Moderate Severity.” Of the 16 released vulnerabilities: Fourteen track issues that c
GHSA
GHSA-h9vm-qp4h-23fm: The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-13
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CWE-20 GHSA-h9vm-qp4h-23fm: The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib
The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short.
OSV
openssl regression
osv·2016-09-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-2182 [CRITICAL] openssl regression
openssl regression
USN-3087-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was
incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update
fixes the problem.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Original advisory details:
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Y
OSV
openssl vulnerabilities
osv·2016-09-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2016-6304 [CRITICAL] openssl vulnerabilities
openssl vulnerabilities
Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the OCSP Status Request
extension. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause memory
consumption, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2016-6304)
Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when
performing pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update.
(CVE-2016-2177)
César Pereida, Billy Brumley, and Yuval Yarom discovered that OpenSSL
did not properly use constant-time operations when performing DSA signing.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a cache-timing
attack and recover private DSA keys. (CVE-201
OSV
CVE-2016-6302: The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib
osv·2016-09-16·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CVE-2016-6302: The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib
The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
HackerOne
Malformed SHA512 ticket DoS (CVE-2016-6302)
hackerone·2017-05-25·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] Malformed SHA512 ticket DoS (CVE-2016-6302)
Malformed SHA512 ticket DoS (CVE-2016-6302)
If a server uses SHA512 for TLS session ticket HMAC it is vulnerable to a
DoS attack where a malformed ticket will result in an OOB read which will
ultimately crash.
The use of SHA512 in TLS session tickets is comparatively rare as it requires
a custom server callback and ticket lookup mechanism.
refer:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt
If a server uses SHA512 for TLS session ticket HMAC it is vulnerable to a DoS attack where a malformed ticket will result in an OOB read which will ultimately crash.
The use of SHA512 in TLS session tickets is comparatively rare as it requires a custom server callback and ticket lookup mechanism.
OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i
OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u
This is
Bugzilla
RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
bugzilla·2016-11-02·CVSS 9.8
[CRITICAL] RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
RHSA-2016:1940: openssl security update
Description of problem:
atomic scan found a CVE bug in registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7/cockpit-ws:latest(b43b419e).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host release 7.3
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# atomic host status
State: idle
Deployments:
● rhel-atomic-host-ostree:rhel-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard
Version: 7.3 (2016-10-26 14:24:09)
Commit: 90c9735becfff1c55c8586ae0f2c904bc0928f042cd4d016e9e0e2edd16e5e97
OSName: rhel-atomic-host
Unlocked: development
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# rpm -q atomic
atomic-1.13.6-1.el7.x86_64
[root@atomic-00 cloud-user]# docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
registry.access.redhat.com/rhel7/o
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-6302 openssl101e: openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [epel-5]
bugzilla·2016-08-24·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CVE-2016-6302 openssl101e: openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [epel-5]
CVE-2016-6302 openssl101e: openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [epel-5]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-6302 mingw-openssl: openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-08-24·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CVE-2016-6302 mingw-openssl: openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-6302 mingw-openssl: openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versi
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks
bugzilla·2016-08-24·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks
CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks
It was found that if a ticket callback changes the HMAC digest to SHA512 the existing sanity checks are not sufficient and an attacker could perform a DoS attack with a malformed ticket.
Upstream patch:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1bbe48ab149893a78bf99c8eb8895c928900a16f
Discussion:
Created openssl101e tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: epel-5 [bug 1369861]
---
Created openssl tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1369858]
---
Created mingw-openssl tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1369860]
---
Support for session tickets / RFC4507, and hence the affected code was introduced in version 0.9.8f. Therefore openssl packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-08-24·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2016-6302 [HIGH] CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient ticket sanity checks [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora.
arXiv
One Bad Apple Spoils the Barrel: Understanding the Security Risks Introduced by Third-Party Components in IoT Firmware
arxiv_fulltext·2022-12-29
One Bad Apple Spoils the Barrel: Understanding the Security Risks Introduced by Third-Party Components in IoT Firmware
One Bad Apple Spoils the Barrel: Understanding the Security Risks Introduced by Third-Party Components in IoT Firmware
## Abstract
Currently, the development of IoT firmware heavily depends on third-party components (TPCs) to improve development efficiency. Nevertheless, TPCs are not secure, and the vulnerabilities in TPCs will influence the security of IoT firmware. Existing works pay less attention to the vulnerabilities caused by TPCs, and we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the security impact of TPC vulnerability against firmware. To fill in the knowledge gap, we design and implement , which leverages syntactical features and control-flow graph features to detect the TPCs in firmware, and then recognizes the corresponding vulnerabilities. Based on , we present the first l
Tenable
[R7] Nessus 6.9 Fixes Multiple Vulnerabilities
blogs_tenable·2016-10-25
[R7] Nessus 6.9 Fixes Multiple Vulnerabilities
## Cloud Exposure
Tenable Cloud Security (CNAPP) Request a demo
Tenable Cloud Vulnerability Management Request a demo
Tenable CIEM Request a demo
Secure your cloud
## Vulnerability Exposure
Tenable Vulnerability Management Try for free
Tenable Security Center Request a demo
Tenable Web App Scanning Try for free
Tenable Patch Management Request a demo
Tenable Enclave Security Request a demo
Tenable Attack Surface Management Request a demo
Tenable Nessus Try for free
## AI Exposure
Tenable AI Exposure Request a demo
## OT/IoT Exposure
Tenable OT Security Request a demo
## Identity Exposure
Tenable Identity Exposure Request a demo
## Business needs
Active Directory
AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)
AWS security
Azure security
Cloud Security Posture Man
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.htmlhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2016-3090566.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92628http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036885http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSVhttp://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUEhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa132https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdfhttps://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=e97763c92c655dcf4af2860b3abd2bc4c8a267f9https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl.aschttps://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.htmlhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2016-3090566.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.htmlhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.htmlhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92628http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036885http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSVhttp://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUEhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa132https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdfhttps://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=e97763c92c655dcf4af2860b3abd2bc4c8a267f9https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl.aschttps://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21
2016-09-16
Published