CVE-2016-9387
published 2017-03-23CVE-2016-9387: Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c in JasPer before 1.900.13 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact…
PriorityP335high7.8CVSS 3.0
AVLACLPRNUIRSUCHIHAH
EPSS
1.91%
77.2th percentile
Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c in JasPer before 1.900.13 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers an assertion failure.
Affected
3 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| jasper_project | jasper | <= 1.900.12 | — |
| jasper_project | jasper | >= 0 < 1.900.1-14ubuntu3.5 | 1.900.1-14ubuntu3.5 |
| jasper_project | jasper | >= 0 < 1.900.1-debian1-2.4ubuntu1.2 | 1.900.1-debian1-2.4ubuntu1.2 |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.07.8HIGHCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv2.06.8MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
osv7.8HIGH
vendor_redhat7.8HIGH
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Ubuntu
JasPer vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2018-06-27
CVE-2015-5203 JasPer vulnerabilities
Title: JasPer vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in JasPer.
It was discovered that JasPer incorrectly handled certain malformed
JPEG-2000 image files. If a user or automated system using JasPer were
tricked into opening a specially crafted image, an attacker could exploit
this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute code with the
privileges of the user invoking the program.
Instructions: In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
Red Hat
jasper: integer overflow in jpc_dec_process_siz()
vendor_redhat·2016-10-23·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CWE-190 jasper: integer overflow in jpc_dec_process_siz()
jasper: integer overflow in jpc_dec_process_siz()
Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c in JasPer before 1.900.13 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers an assertion failure.
Package: netpbm (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Will not fix
Package: mingw-virt-viewer (Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3) - Will not fix
GHSA
GHSA-w66x-crr7-57qh: Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-14
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CWE-190 GHSA-w66x-crr7-57qh: Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec
Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c in JasPer before 1.900.13 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers an assertion failure.
OSV
CVE-2016-9387: Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec
osv·2017-03-23·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CVE-2016-9387: Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec
Integer overflow in the jpc_dec_process_siz function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c in JasPer before 1.900.13 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers an assertion failure.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 mingw-jasper: vari
bugzilla·2016-11-21·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 mingw-jasper: vari
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 mingw-jasper: various flaws [epel-7]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 jasper: various fl
bugzilla·2016-11-21·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 jasper: various fl
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 jasper: various flaws [epel-5]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also m
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-9387 jasper: integer overflow in jpc_dec_process_siz()
bugzilla·2016-11-21·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CVE-2016-9387 jasper: integer overflow in jpc_dec_process_siz()
CVE-2016-9387 jasper: integer overflow in jpc_dec_process_siz()
An integer overflow in jpc_dec_process_siz was found that can be triggered by crafted image file when given as input to imginfo
Upstream patch:
https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/d91198abd00fc435a397fe6bad906a4c1748e9cf
CVE assignment:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/441
Discussion:
Created mingw-jasper tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1396987]
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1396989]
---
Created jasper tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1396986]
Affects: epel-5 [bug 1396988]
---
This issue was originally reported as an assertion failure. Upstream bug report is:
https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/issues/49
The fix for integer overflow problem in jpc_dec_process_siz() did n
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-9390 jasper: insufficient SIZ marker tilexoff and tileyoff checks
bugzilla·2016-11-21·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9390 [HIGH] CVE-2016-9390 jasper: insufficient SIZ marker tilexoff and tileyoff checks
CVE-2016-9390 jasper: insufficient SIZ marker tilexoff and tileyoff checks
An assertion failure was found in jasper triggered when tiles lie outside of the image area.
Upstream patch:
https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/ba2b9d000660313af7b692542afbd374c5685865
CVE assignment:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/441
Discussion:
Created mingw-jasper tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1396987]
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1396989]
---
Created jasper tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1396986]
Affects: epel-5 [bug 1396988]
---
This issue was reported upstream in:
https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/issues/49
https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/issues/53
It was first incorrectly fixed in version jasper 1.900.13 by protecting against integer overfl
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 CVE-2016-9557 CVE-
bugzilla·2016-11-21·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 CVE-2016-9557 CVE-
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9395 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9397 CVE-2016-9398 CVE-2016-9399 CVE-2016-9557 CVE-2016-9560 mingw-jasper: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant t
Bugzilla
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9560 jasper: various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2016-11-21·CVSS 7.8
CVE-2016-9387 [HIGH] CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9560 jasper: various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2016-9387 CVE-2016-9388 CVE-2016-9389 CVE-2016-9390 CVE-2016-9391 CVE-2016-9392 CVE-2016-9393 CVE-2016-9394 CVE-2016-9396 CVE-2016-9560 jasper: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM c
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/17/1http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94374https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/16/jasper-multiple-assertion-failurehttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396959https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/d91198abd00fc435a397fe6bad906a4c1748e9cfhttps://usn.ubuntu.com/3693-1/http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/17/1http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94374https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/16/jasper-multiple-assertion-failurehttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396959https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/d91198abd00fc435a397fe6bad906a4c1748e9cfhttps://usn.ubuntu.com/3693-1/
2017-03-23
Published