CVE-2017-5653
published 2017-04-18CVE-2017-5653: JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows…
PriorityP337medium5.3CVSS 3.0
AVNACLPRNUINSUCNILAN
EPSS
11.17%
95.4th percentile
JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.
Affected
4 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | cxf | 3.0.0 – 3.0.13 | — |
| apache | cxf | 3.1.0 – 3.1.11 | — |
| apache_software_foundation | apache_cxf | — | — |
| apache_software_foundation | apache_cxf | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.05.3MEDIUMCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
vendor_redhat5.3MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
OSV
Improper Certificate Validation in Apache CXF
osv·2022-05-13
CVE-2017-5653 [MEDIUM] Improper Certificate Validation in Apache CXF
Improper Certificate Validation in Apache CXF
JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.
GHSA
Improper Certificate Validation in Apache CXF
ghsa·2022-05-13
CVE-2017-5653 [MEDIUM] CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation in Apache CXF
Improper Certificate Validation in Apache CXF
JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.
Red Hat
cxf: CXF JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted
vendor_redhat·2017-03-27·CVSS 5.3
CVE-2017-5653 [MEDIUM] cxf: CXF JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted
cxf: CXF JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted
JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.
It was found that a flaw exists in JAX-RS clients using the streaming approach for XML signatures and encryption, where it does not enforce the message to be signed/encrypted. This could allow an attacker to subvert the integrity of the message.
Package: cxf (Red Hat BPM Suite 6) - Not affected
Package: cxf (Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5) - Not affected
Package: cxf (Red Hat JBoss BRMS 6) - Not affected
Package: cxf (Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 6) - Not affected
Package: cxf (Red Hat JBoss Data V
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2017-5653 CVE-2017-5656 cxf: various flaws [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2017-04-25·CVSS 5.3
CVE-2017-5653 [MEDIUM] CVE-2017-5653 CVE-2017-5656 cxf: various flaws [fedora-all]
CVE-2017-5653 CVE-2017-5656 cxf: various flaws [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While
Bugzilla
CVE-2017-5653 cxf: CXF JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted
bugzilla·2017-04-25·CVSS 5.3
CVE-2017-5653 [MEDIUM] CVE-2017-5653 cxf: CXF JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted
CVE-2017-5653 cxf: CXF JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted
Apache CXF supports the ability to use XML Signature and encryption to secure
JAX-RS services. Two different implementations are available, a DOM based
approach that works on a model of the message in memory before applying
security, and a streaming based implementation that is a useful alternative
for larger messages.
There is a bug in validating messages for JAX-RS clients using the streaming
approach, where it will not enforce that the message is signed and/or
encrypted. An exception is thrown in these cases but not properly propagated
to the client code. The bug does not apply for the DOM clients and it does not
apply for the streaming server side case.
Exte
Bugzilla
CVE-2013-5653 ghostscript: getenv and filenameforall ignore -dSAFER
bugzilla·2016-09-29·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2013-5653 [MEDIUM] CVE-2013-5653 ghostscript: getenv and filenameforall ignore -dSAFER
CVE-2013-5653 ghostscript: getenv and filenameforall ignore -dSAFER
It was found that getenv and filenameforall ignore -dSAFER possibly allowing filesystem enumeration.
Upstream bug:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694724
Upstream patch:
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=ab109aaeb3ddba59518b036fb288402a65cf7ce8
Reference:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q3/651
Reproducer:
%!PS
(HOME) getenv { print (\n) print } { (variable not found\n) print } ifelse
Discussion:
Created ghostscript tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1390486]
---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Via RHSA-2017:0014 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html
---
This issue has been addressed in the
http://cxf.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2017-5653.txt.asc?version=1&modificationDate=1492515074710&api=v2http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97968http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038279https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1832https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff42cfa5e7d75b7c1af0e37589140a8f1999e578a75738740b244bd4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttp://cxf.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2017-5653.txt.asc?version=1&modificationDate=1492515074710&api=v2http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97968http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038279https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1832https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff42cfa5e7d75b7c1af0e37589140a8f1999e578a75738740b244bd4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E
2017-04-18
Published