CVE-2017-9103
published 2020-06-18CVE-2017-9103: An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next. Without this, an uninitialised stack value…
PriorityP349critical9.8CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSUCHIHAH
EPSS
2.05%
79.0th percentile
An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next. Without this, an uninitialised stack value can be used as the first label length. Depending on the circumstances, an attacker might be able to trick adns into crashing the calling program, leaking aspects of the contents of some of its memory, causing it to allocate lots of memory, or perhaps overrunning a buffer. This is only possible with applications which make non-raw queries for SOA or RP records.
Affected
9 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | adns | < adns 1.6.0-2 (bookworm) | adns 1.6.0-2 (bookworm) |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| gnu | adns | < 1.5.2 | 1.5.2 |
| gnu | adns | >= 0 < 1.6.0-2 | 1.6.0-2 |
| gnu | adns | >= 0 < 1.6.0-2 | 1.6.0-2 |
| gnu | adns | >= 0 < 1.6.0-2 | 1.6.0-2 |
| gnu | adns | >= 0 < 1.6.0-2 | 1.6.0-2 |
| opensuse | leap | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.19.8CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv2.07.5HIGHAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
osv9.8CRITICAL
vendor_debian9.8LOW
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-q936-xr3r-7gqr: An issue was discovered in adns before 1
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-24
CVE-2017-9103 [HIGH] CWE-119 GHSA-q936-xr3r-7gqr: An issue was discovered in adns before 1
An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next. Without this, an uninitialised stack value can be used as the first label length. Depending on the circumstances, an attacker might be able to trick adns into crashing the calling program, leaking aspects of the contents of some of its memory, causing it to allocate lots of memory, or perhaps overrunning a buffer. This is only possible with applications which make non-raw queries for SOA or RP records.
OSV
CVE-2017-9103: An issue was discovered in adns before 1
osv·2020-06-18·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2017-9103 [CRITICAL] CVE-2017-9103: An issue was discovered in adns before 1
An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next. Without this, an uninitialised stack value can be used as the first label length. Depending on the circumstances, an attacker might be able to trick adns into crashing the calling program, leaking aspects of the contents of some of its memory, causing it to allocate lots of memory, or perhaps overrunning a buffer. This is only possible with applications which make non-raw queries for SOA or RP records.
Debian
CVE-2017-9103: adns - An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly c...
vendor_debian·2017·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2017-9103 [CRITICAL] CVE-2017-9103: adns - An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly c...
An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next. Without this, an uninitialised stack value can be used as the first label length. Depending on the circumstances, an attacker might be able to trick adns into crashing the calling program, leaking aspects of the contents of some of its memory, causing it to allocate lots of memory, or perhaps overrunning a buffer. This is only possible with applications which make non-raw queries for SOA or RP records.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1.6.0-2)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1.6.0-2)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1.6.0-2)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1.6.0-2)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1.6.0-2)
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2017-9103 adns: pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2020-06-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2017-9103 [CRITICAL] CVE-2017-9103 adns: pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next [fedora-all]
CVE-2017-9103 adns: pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects mult
Bugzilla
CVE-2017-9103 adns: pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next
bugzilla·2020-06-22·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2017-9103 [CRITICAL] CVE-2017-9103 adns: pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next
CVE-2017-9103 adns: pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next
An issue was discovered in adns before 1.5.2. pap_mailbox822 does not properly check st from adns__findlabel_next. Without this, an uninitialised stack value can be used as the first label length. Depending on the circumstances, an attacker might be able to trick adns into crashing the calling program, leaking aspects of the contents of some of its memory, causing it to allocate lots of memory, or perhaps overrunning a buffer. This is only possible with applications which make non-raw queries for SOA or RP records.
Reference:
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/adns-announce/2020/000004.html
Discussion:
Created adns tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1849776]
---
This
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00037.htmlhttp://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?p=adns.githttp://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?p=adns.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf=changeloghttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TRVHN3GGVNQWAOL3PWC5FLAV7HUESLZR/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UGFZ4SPV6KFQK6ZNUZFB5Y32OYFOM5YJ/https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/adns-announce/2020/000004.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00037.htmlhttp://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?p=adns.githttp://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ianmdlvl/git?p=adns.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf=changeloghttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TRVHN3GGVNQWAOL3PWC5FLAV7HUESLZR/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UGFZ4SPV6KFQK6ZNUZFB5Y32OYFOM5YJ/https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/adns-announce/2020/000004.html
2020-06-18
Published