CVE-2018-10845
published 2018-08-22CVE-2018-10845: It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct…
PriorityP432medium5.9CVSS 3.1
AVNACHPRNUINSUCHINAN
EPSS
3.62%
88.2th percentile
It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets.
Affected
12 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| canonical | ubuntu_linux | — | — |
| canonical | ubuntu_linux | — | — |
| canonical | ubuntu_linux | — | — |
| canonical | ubuntu_linux | — | — |
| debian | debian_linux | — | — |
| debian | gnutls28 | < gnutls28 3.5.19-1 (bookworm) | gnutls28 3.5.19-1 (bookworm) |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| gnu | gnutls | < 3.6.12 | 3.6.12 |
| redhat | enterprise_linux_desktop | — | — |
| redhat | enterprise_linux_server | — | — |
| redhat | enterprise_linux_workstation | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.15.9MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvdv3.05.9MEDIUMCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvdv2.04.3MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
osv5.9MEDIUM
vendor_debian5.9MEDIUM
vendor_redhat5.9MEDIUM
vendor_ubuntu5.9MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Ubuntu
GnuTLS vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2019-05-30·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10844 [MEDIUM] GnuTLS vulnerabilities
Title: GnuTLS vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in GnuTLS.
Eyal Ronen, Kenneth G. Paterson, and Adi Shamir discovered that GnuTLS was
vulnerable to a timing side-channel attack known as the "Lucky Thirteen"
issue. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform
plaintext-recovery attacks via analysis of timing data. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. (CVE-2018-10844,
CVE-2018-10845, CVE-2018-10846)
Tavis Ormandy discovered that GnuTLS incorrectly handled memory when
verifying certain X.509 certificates. A remote attacker could use this
issue to cause GnuTLS to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or
possibly execute arbitrary code. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS,
Ubuntu 18.10, and Ubuntu 19.04. (CVE-2019-38
Red Hat
gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant
vendor_redhat·2018-08-21·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CWE-327 gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant
gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant
It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets.
It was found that GnuTLS's implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky Thirteen-style attack. A remote attacker could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets.
Package: gnutls (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) - Will not fix
Package: gnutls (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6) - Will not fix
Package: gnutls (Red Hat Enterprise Linu
Debian
CVE-2018-10845: gnutls28 - It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a ...
vendor_debian·2018·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CVE-2018-10845: gnutls28 - It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a ...
It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 3.5.19-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 3.5.19-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 3.5.19-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 3.5.19-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 3.5.19-1)
GHSA
GHSA-m5px-2q2g-hxc2: It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-13
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CWE-327 GHSA-m5px-2q2g-hxc2: It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack
It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets.
OSV
gnutls28 vulnerabilities
osv·2019-05-30·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10844 [MEDIUM] gnutls28 vulnerabilities
gnutls28 vulnerabilities
Eyal Ronen, Kenneth G. Paterson, and Adi Shamir discovered that GnuTLS was
vulnerable to a timing side-channel attack known as the "Lucky Thirteen"
issue. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform
plaintext-recovery attacks via analysis of timing data. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. (CVE-2018-10844,
CVE-2018-10845, CVE-2018-10846)
Tavis Ormandy discovered that GnuTLS incorrectly handled memory when
verifying certain X.509 certificates. A remote attacker could use this
issue to cause GnuTLS to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or
possibly execute arbitrary code. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS,
Ubuntu 18.10, and Ubuntu 19.04. (CVE-2019-3829)
It was discovered that GnuTLS incorrectly handled certai
OSV
CVE-2018-10845: It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack
osv·2018-08-22·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CVE-2018-10845: It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack
It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2018-10845 mingw-gnutls: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2018-08-21·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CVE-2018-10845 mingw-gnutls: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [fedora-all]
CVE-2018-10845 mingw-gnutls: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NO
Bugzilla
CVE-2018-10845 mingw-gnutls: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [epel-all]
bugzilla·2018-08-21·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CVE-2018-10845 mingw-gnutls: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [epel-all]
CVE-2018-10845 mingw-gnutls: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [epel-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of epel-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE:
Bugzilla
CVE-2018-10845 gnutls30: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [epel-all]
bugzilla·2018-08-21·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CVE-2018-10845 gnutls30: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [epel-all]
CVE-2018-10845 gnutls30: gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [epel-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of epel-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this
Bugzilla
CVE-2018-10845 gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [fedora-all]
bugzilla·2018-08-21·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CVE-2018-10845 gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [fedora-all]
CVE-2018-10845 gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant [fedora-all]
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue
Bugzilla
CVE-2018-10845 gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant
bugzilla·2018-05-25·CVSS 5.9
CVE-2018-10845 [MEDIUM] CVE-2018-10845 gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant
CVE-2018-10845 gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant
It was found that GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to Lucky thirteen style attack due to use of wrong constant appropriate to hash functions that encode the length field.
Discussion:
External References:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/747
---
Created gnutls tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1619517]
Created gnutls30 tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: epel-all [bug 1619519]
Created mingw-gnutls tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: epel-all [bug 1619520]
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1619518]
---
Upstream patch:
https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/657
---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Ent
arXiv
Revisiting and Evaluating Software Side-channel Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures in Cryptographic Applications
arxiv_fulltext·2019-12-12
Revisiting and Evaluating Software Side-channel Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures in Cryptographic Applications
Revisiting and Evaluating Software Side-channel Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures in Cryptographic Applications
Tianwei Zhang
Nanyang Technological University
[email protected]
Jun Jiang
Two Sigma Investments, LP
[email protected]
Yinqian Zhang
The Ohio State University
[email protected]
dkgreenrgb0,0.6,0
grayrgb0.5,0.5,0.5
mauvergb0.58,0,0.82
frame=tb,
language=C,
aboveskip=3mm,
belowskip=3mm,
showstringspaces=false,
columns=flexible,
basicstyle= ,
numbers=left,
numbersep=-2pt,
numberstyle= ,
keywordstyle=blue,
commentstyle=dkgreen,
stringstyle=mauve,
breaklines=true,
breakatwhitespace=true,
tabsize=3
## Abstract
We systematize software side-channel attacks with a focus on vulnerabilities
and countermeasures in the cryptographic implementations. Particularly,
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105138https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3050https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10845https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/747https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/657https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00022.htmlhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ILMOWPKMTZAIMK5F32TUMO34XCABUCFJ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WDYY3R4F5CUTFAMXH2C5NKYFVDEJLTT7/https://usn.ubuntu.com/3999-1/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105138https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3050https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10845https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/747https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/657https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00022.htmlhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ILMOWPKMTZAIMK5F32TUMO34XCABUCFJ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WDYY3R4F5CUTFAMXH2C5NKYFVDEJLTT7/https://usn.ubuntu.com/3999-1/
2018-08-22
Published