CVE-2019-0229
published 2019-04-10CVE-2019-0229: A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request forgery…
PriorityP335high8.8CVSS 3.0
AVNACLPRNUIRSUCHIHAH
EPSS
1.56%
72.4th percentile
A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks.
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | airflow | <= 1.10.2 | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.08.8HIGHCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv2.06.8MEDIUMAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
OSV
Apache Airflow vulnerable to CSRF Attacks
osv·2019-04-18
CVE-2019-0229 [HIGH] Apache Airflow vulnerable to CSRF Attacks
Apache Airflow vulnerable to CSRF Attacks
A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks.
GHSA
Apache Airflow vulnerable to CSRF Attacks
ghsa·2019-04-18
CVE-2019-0229 [HIGH] CWE-352 Apache Airflow vulnerable to CSRF Attacks
Apache Airflow vulnerable to CSRF Attacks
A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks.
OSV
CVE-2019-0229: A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request
osv·2019-04-10
CVE-2019-0229 CVE-2019-0229: A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request
A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/10/6http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107869https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2de387213d45bc626d27554a1bde7b8c67d08720901f82a50b6f4231%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3Ehttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/10/6http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107869https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2de387213d45bc626d27554a1bde7b8c67d08720901f82a50b6f4231%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
2019-04-10
Published