CVE-2021-25329
published 2021-03-01CVE-2021-25329: The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a…
PriorityP340high7CVSS 3.1
AVLACHPRLUINSUCHIHAH
EPSS
9.49%
94.9th percentile
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
Affected
26 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | tomcat | — | — |
| apache | tomcat | — | — |
| apache | tomcat | — | — |
| apache | tomcat | 7.0.0 – 7.0.107 | — |
| apache | tomcat | 8.5.0 – 8.5.61 | — |
| apache | tomcat | 9.0.0 – 9.0.41 | — |
| debian | debian_linux | — | — |
| debian | debian_linux | — | — |
| debian | tomcat9 | < tomcat9 9.0.43-1 (bookworm) | tomcat9 9.0.43-1 (bookworm) |
| oracle | agile_plm | — | — |
| oracle | agile_plm | — | — |
| oracle | communications_cloud_native_core_policy | — | — |
| oracle | communications_cloud_native_core_security_edge_protection_proxy | — | — |
| oracle | communications_instant_messaging_server | — | — |
| oracle | database | — | — |
| oracle | database | — | — |
| oracle | database | — | — |
| oracle | graph_server_and_client | < 21.3.0 | 21.3.0 |
| oracle | instantis_enterprisetrack | — | — |
| oracle | instantis_enterprisetrack | — | — |
| oracle | instantis_enterprisetrack | — | — |
| oracle | managed_file_transfer | — | — |
| oracle | managed_file_transfer | — | — |
| oracle | mysql_enterprise_monitor | <= 8.0.23 | — |
| oracle | siebel_ui_framework | < 21.9 | 21.9 |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.17.0HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv2.04.4MEDIUMAV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
ghsa7.0HIGH
osv7.0HIGH
vendor_apache7.0LOW
vendor_debian7.0HIGH
vendor_redhat7.0HIGH
vendor_ubuntu6.1MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Ubuntu
Tomcat vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2024-07-23·CVSS 6.1
CVE-2021-25329 [MEDIUM] Tomcat vulnerabilities
Title: Tomcat vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in Tomcat.
It was discovered that the Tomcat SSI printenv command echoed user
provided data without escaping it. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to perform an XSS attack. (CVE-2019-0221)
It was discovered that Tomcat incorrectly handled certain uncommon
PersistenceManager with FileStore configurations. A remote attacker could
possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2020-9484, CVE-2021-25329)
Instructions: In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
Ubuntu
Tomcat vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2022-03-31·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2021-33037 [MEDIUM] Tomcat vulnerabilities
Title: Tomcat vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in Tomcat.
It was discovered that Tomcat incorrectly performed input verification.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to intercept sensitive
information. (CVE-2020-13943, CVE-2020-17527, CVE-2021-25122, CVE-2021-30640)
It was discovered that Tomcat did not properly deserialize untrusted data.
An attacker could possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2020-9484, CVE-2021-33037)
It was discovered that Tomcat did not properly validate the input length. An
attacker could possibly use this to trigger an infinite loop, resulting in a
denial of service. (CVE-2021-25329, CVE-2021-41079)
Instructions: In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
Red Hat
tomcat: Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484 (RCE via session persistence)
vendor_redhat·2021-03-01·CVSS 7.0
CVE-2021-25329 [HIGH] CWE-502 tomcat: Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484 (RCE via session persistence)
tomcat: Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484 (RCE via session persistence)
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
Statement: In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Red Hat Certificate System 10 and Identity Management are using the `pki-servlet-engine` component, which embeds a vulnerable version of Tomcat. However, in these specific contexts, the prerequisites to the vulnerability are not met. The PersistentManager
Debian
CVE-2021-25329: tomcat9 - The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to ...
vendor_debian·2021·CVSS 7.0
CVE-2021-25329 [HIGH] CVE-2021-25329: tomcat9 - The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to ...
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 9.0.43-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 9.0.43-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 9.0.43-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 9.0.43-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 9.0.43-1)
Apache
Apache tomcat: CVE-2020-9484
vendor_apache·CVSS 7.0
CVE-2020-9484 [LOW] Apache tomcat: CVE-2020-9484
Apache tomcat: CVE-2020-9484
CVE-2021-25329 The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using a highly unlikely configuration edge case, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9484 . Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published non-upgrade mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue. This was fixed with commit 6d66e99e . This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security team by Trung Pham of Viettel Cyber Security on 12 January 2021. The issue was made public on 1 March 2021. Affects: 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0
Severity: low
OSV
tomcat vulnerabilities
osv·2024-07-23·CVSS 6.1
CVE-2019-0221 [MEDIUM] tomcat vulnerabilities
tomcat vulnerabilities
It was discovered that the Tomcat SSI printenv command echoed user
provided data without escaping it. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to perform an XSS attack. (CVE-2019-0221)
It was discovered that Tomcat incorrectly handled certain uncommon
PersistenceManager with FileStore configurations. A remote attacker could
possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2020-9484, CVE-2021-25329)
OSV
tomcat9 vulnerabilities
osv·2022-03-31·CVSS 4.3
CVE-2020-13943 [MEDIUM] tomcat9 vulnerabilities
tomcat9 vulnerabilities
It was discovered that Tomcat incorrectly performed input verification.
A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to intercept sensitive
information. (CVE-2020-13943, CVE-2020-17527, CVE-2021-25122, CVE-2021-30640)
It was discovered that Tomcat did not properly deserialize untrusted data.
An attacker could possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2020-9484, CVE-2021-33037)
It was discovered that Tomcat did not properly validate the input length. An
attacker could possibly use this to trigger an infinite loop, resulting in a
denial of service. (CVE-2021-25329, CVE-2021-41079)
GHSA
Potential remote code execution in Apache Tomcat
ghsa·2021-03-19·CVSS 7.0
CVE-2021-25329 [HIGH] CWE-502 Potential remote code execution in Apache Tomcat
Potential remote code execution in Apache Tomcat
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
OSV
Potential remote code execution in Apache Tomcat
osv·2021-03-19·CVSS 7.0
CVE-2021-25329 [HIGH] Potential remote code execution in Apache Tomcat
Potential remote code execution in Apache Tomcat
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
OSV
CVE-2021-25329: The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete
osv·2021-03-01·CVSS 7.0
CVE-2021-25329 [HIGH] CVE-2021-25329: The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
arXiv
Towards Automated Attack Simulations of BPMN-based Processes
arxiv_fulltext·2021-06-16
Towards Automated Attack Simulations of BPMN-based Processes
Towards Automated Attack Simulations of BPMN-based Processes
Simon Hacks, Robert Lagerström
Division of Network and Systems Engineering
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Stockholm, Sweden
\shacks|robertl\@kth.se
Daniel Ritter
SAP SE
Walldorf (Baden), Germany
[email protected]
## Abstract
Process digitization and integration is an increasing need for enterprises, while cyber-attacks denote a growing threat.
Using the Business Process Management Notation (BPMN) is common to handle the digital and integration focus within and across organizations.
In other parts of the same companies, threat modeling and attack graphs are used for analyzing the security posture and resilience.
In this paper, we propose a novel approach to use attack graph simulations on processes represented in
Bugzilla
CVE-2021-25329 tomcat: Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484 (RCE via session persistence)
bugzilla·2021-03-02·CVSS 7.0
CVE-2021-25329 [HIGH] CVE-2021-25329 tomcat: Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484 (RCE via session persistence)
CVE-2021-25329 tomcat: Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484 (RCE via session persistence)
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using a highly unlikely configuration edge case, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9484. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published non-upgrade mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
Upstream commits:
Tomcat 10.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/6d66e99ef85da93e4d2c2a536ca51aa3418bfaf4
Tomcat 9.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/4785433a226a20df6acbea49296e1ce7e23de453
Tomcat 8.5: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/93f0cc403a9210d469afc2bd9cf03ab3251c6f35
Tomcat 7.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/74b105657ffbd1d1de80455f03446c3bbf30d1
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/2https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r11ce01e8a4c7269b88f88212f21830edf73558997ac7744f37769b77%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r732b2ca289dc02df2de820e8775559abd6c207f159e39f559547a085%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8a2ac0e476dbfc1e6440b09dcc782d444ad635d6da26f0284725a5dc%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb51ccd58b2152fc75125b2406fc93e04ca9d34e737263faa6ff0f41f%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf6d5d57b114678d8898005faef31e9fd6d7c981fcc4ccfc3bc272fc9%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00018.htmlhttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-34https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210409-0002/https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4891https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.htmlhttps://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.htmlhttps://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.htmlhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/2https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r11ce01e8a4c7269b88f88212f21830edf73558997ac7744f37769b77%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r732b2ca289dc02df2de820e8775559abd6c207f159e39f559547a085%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8a2ac0e476dbfc1e6440b09dcc782d444ad635d6da26f0284725a5dc%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb51ccd58b2152fc75125b2406fc93e04ca9d34e737263faa6ff0f41f%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf6d5d57b114678d8898005faef31e9fd6d7c981fcc4ccfc3bc272fc9%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfe62fbf9d4c314f166fe8c668e50e5d9dd882a99447f26f0367474bf%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00018.htmlhttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-34https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210409-0002/https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4891https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.htmlhttps://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.htmlhttps://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
2021-03-01
Published