CVE-2021-27737
published 2021-05-14CVE-2021-27737: Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experimental Slicer plugin.
PriorityP342high7.5CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
3.80%
88.8th percentile
Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experimental Slicer plugin.
Affected
2 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | traffic_server | — | — |
| debian | trafficserver | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.17.5HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvdv2.05.0MEDIUMAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
osv7.5HIGH
vendor_debian7.5LOW
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Debian
CVE-2021-27737: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experime...
vendor_debian·2021·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2021-27737 [HIGH] CVE-2021-27737: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experime...
Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experimental Slicer plugin.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved
bullseye: resolved
sid: resolved
GHSA
GHSA-j9pm-x686-vcvp: Apache Traffic Server 9
ghsa_unreviewed·2022-05-24
CVE-2021-27737 [HIGH] GHSA-j9pm-x686-vcvp: Apache Traffic Server 9
Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experimental Slicer plugin.
OSV
CVE-2021-27737: Apache Traffic Server 9
osv·2021-05-14·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2021-27737 [HIGH] CVE-2021-27737: Apache Traffic Server 9
Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experimental Slicer plugin.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cdev.trafficserver.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cusers.trafficserver.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cannounce.trafficserver.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cdev.trafficserver.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r74f72650c3590478f028ea3a1b8cab2a33d20ad9ff407e894ca70525%40%3Cusers.trafficserver.apache.org%3E
2021-05-14
Published