cbcvebase.
CVE-2022-49067
published 2025-02-26

CVE-2022-49067: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc: Fix virt_addr_valid() for 64-bit Book3E & 32-bit mpe: On 64-bit Book3E vmalloc…

PriorityP421medium5.5CVSS 3.1
AVLACLPRLUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
0.26%
17.3th percentile
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc: Fix virt_addr_valid() for 64-bit Book3E & 32-bit mpe: On 64-bit Book3E vmalloc space starts at 0x8000000000000000. Because of the way __pa() works we have: __pa(0x8000000000000000) == 0, and therefore virt_to_pfn(0x8000000000000000) == 0, and therefore virt_addr_valid(0x8000000000000000) == true Which is wrong, virt_addr_valid() should be false for vmalloc space. In fact all vmalloc addresses that alias with a valid PFN will return true from virt_addr_valid(). That can cause bugs with hardened usercopy as described below by Kefeng Wang: When running ethtool eth0 on 64-bit Book3E, a BUG occurred: usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object not in SLUB page?! (offset 0, size 1048)! kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99 ... usercopy_abort+0x64/0xa0 (unreliable) __check_heap_object+0x168/0x190 __check_object_size+0x1a0/0x200 dev_ethtool+0x2494/0x2b20 dev_ioctl+0x5d0/0x770 sock_do_ioctl+0xf0/0x1d0 sock_ioctl+0x3ec/0x5a0 __se_sys_ioctl+0xf0/0x160 system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0 system_call_common+0xf8/0x200 The code shows below, data = vzalloc(array_size(gstrings.len, ETH_GSTRING_LEN)); copy_to_user(useraddr, data, gstrings.len * ETH_GSTRING_LEN)) The data is alloced by vmalloc(), virt_addr_valid(ptr) will return true on 64-bit Book3E, which leads to the panic. As commit 4dd7554a6456 ("powerpc/64: Add VIRTUAL_BUG_ON checks for __va and __pa addresses") does, make sure the virt addr above PAGE_OFFSET in the virt_addr_valid() for 64-bit, also add upper limit check to make sure the virt is below high_memory. Meanwhile, for 32-bit PAGE_OFFSET is the virtual address of the start of lowmem, high_memory is the upper low virtual address, the check is suitable for 32-bit, this will fix the issue mentioned in commit 602946ec2f90 ("powerpc: Set max_mapnr correctly") too. On 32-bit there is a similar problem with high memory, that was fixed in commit 602946ec2f90 ("powerpc: Set m

Affected

18 ranges
VendorProductVersion rangeFixed in
debianlinux< linux 5.17.3-1 (bookworm)linux 5.17.3-1 (bookworm)
linuxlinux
linuxlinux>= ffda09a9941c18d9f08d1176d55588d505f62912 < deab81144d5a043f42804207fb76cfbd8a806978deab81144d5a043f42804207fb76cfbd8a806978
linuxlinux>= ffda09a9941c18d9f08d1176d55588d505f62912 < d36febbcd537fcc50284e8b89609632d0146529fd36febbcd537fcc50284e8b89609632d0146529f
linuxlinux>= ffda09a9941c18d9f08d1176d55588d505f62912 < fddb88bd266f4513abab7c36bca98935c9148a98fddb88bd266f4513abab7c36bca98935c9148a98
linuxlinux>= ffda09a9941c18d9f08d1176d55588d505f62912 < a3727c25eacd7e437c4f560957fa3a376fe93e6ba3727c25eacd7e437c4f560957fa3a376fe93e6b
linuxlinux>= ffda09a9941c18d9f08d1176d55588d505f62912 < cbc065efcba000ad8f615f506ebe61b6d3c5145bcbc065efcba000ad8f615f506ebe61b6d3c5145b
linuxlinux>= ffda09a9941c18d9f08d1176d55588d505f62912 < ffa0b64e3be58519ae472ea29a1a1ad681e32f48ffa0b64e3be58519ae472ea29a1a1ad681e32f48
linuxlinux_kernel< 5.4.1905.4.190
linuxlinux_kernel
linuxlinux_kernel>= 0 < 5.10.113-15.10.113-1
linuxlinux_kernel>= 0 < 5.17.3-15.17.3-1
linuxlinux_kernel>= 0 < 5.17.3-15.17.3-1
linuxlinux_kernel>= 0 < 5.17.3-15.17.3-1
linuxlinux_kernel>= 5.11 < 5.15.345.15.34
linuxlinux_kernel>= 5.16 < 5.16.205.16.20
linuxlinux_kernel>= 5.17 < 5.17.35.17.3
linuxlinux_kernel>= 5.5 < 5.10.1115.10.111

CVSS provenance

nvdv3.15.5MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
osv5.5MEDIUM
vendor_debian5.5MEDIUM
vendor_redhat5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.

Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.