CVE-2022-50648
published 2025-12-09CVE-2022-50648: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller Naveen reported…
PriorityP420low5.5
EPSS
0.18%
8.0th percentile
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
Naveen reported recursive locking of direct_mutex with sample
ftrace-direct-modify.ko:
[ 74.762406] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 74.762887] 6.0.0-rc6+ #33 Not tainted
[ 74.763216] --------------------------------------------
[ 74.763672] event-sample-fn/1084 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 74.764152] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180
[ 74.764922]
[ 74.764922] but task is already holding lock:
[ 74.765421] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0
[ 74.766142]
[ 74.766142] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 74.766701] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 74.766701]
[ 74.767216] CPU0
[ 74.767437] ----
[ 74.767656] lock(direct_mutex);
[ 74.767952] lock(direct_mutex);
[ 74.768245]
[ 74.768245] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 74.768245]
[ 74.768750] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 74.768750]
[ 74.769332] 1 lock held by event-sample-fn/1084:
[ 74.769731] #0: ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0
[ 74.770496]
[ 74.770496] stack backtrace:
[ 74.770884] CPU: 4 PID: 1084 Comm: event-sample-fn Not tainted ...
[ 74.771498] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ...
[ 74.772474] Call Trace:
[ 74.772696]
[ 74.772896] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5b
[ 74.773223] __lock_acquire.cold.74+0xac/0x2b7
[ 74.773616] lock_acquire+0xd2/0x310
[ 74.773936] ? register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180
[ 74.774357] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd8/0x130
[ 74.774744] ? my_tramp2+0x11/0x11 [ftrace_direct_modify]
[ 74.775213] __mutex_lock+0x99/0x1010
[ 74.775536] ? register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180
[ 74.775954] ? slab_free_freelist_hook.isra.43+0x115/0x160
[ 74.776424] ? ftrace_set_hash+0x195/0x220
[ 74.776779] ? register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180
[ 74.777194] ? kfree+0x3e1/0x440
[ 74.777482] ? my_
Affected
8 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | linux | < linux 6.0.3-1 (bookworm) | linux 6.0.3-1 (bookworm) |
| linux | linux | — | — |
| linux | linux | >= 53cd885bc5c3ea283cc9c00ca6446c778f00bfba < 2482eacb685b6500e158268befbe6c90de5f166a | 2482eacb685b6500e158268befbe6c90de5f166a |
| linux | linux | >= 53cd885bc5c3ea283cc9c00ca6446c778f00bfba < 9d2ce78ddcee159eb6a97449e9c68b6d60b9cec4 | 9d2ce78ddcee159eb6a97449e9c68b6d60b9cec4 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.0.3-1 | 6.0.3-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.0.3-1 | 6.0.3-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.0.3-1 | 6.0.3-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 6.0.0 < 6.0.3 | 6.0.3 |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Red Hat
kernel: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
vendor_redhat·2025-12-09·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2022-50648 [LOW] CWE-764 kernel: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
kernel: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
Naveen reported recursive locking of direct_mutex with sample
ftrace-direct-modify.ko:
[ 74.762406] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 74.762887] 6.0.0-rc6+ #33 Not tainted
[ 74.763216] --------------------------------------------
[ 74.763672] event-sample-fn/1084 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 74.764152] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180
[ 74.764922]
[ 74.764922] but task is already holding lock:
[ 74.765421] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0
[ 74.766142]
[
Debian
CVE-2022-50648: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix...
vendor_debian·2022
CVE-2022-50648 CVE-2022-50648: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller Naveen reported recursive locking of direct_mutex with sample ftrace-direct-modify.ko: [ 74.762406] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 74.762887] 6.0.0-rc6+ #33 Not tainted [ 74.763216] -------------------------------------------- [ 74.763672] event-sample-fn/1084 is trying to acquire lock: [ 74.764152] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \ register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.764922] [ 74.764922] but task is already holding lock: [ 74.765421] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \ modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0 [ 74.766142] [ 74.766142] other info that might help us debug this: [ 74.766701] Possible unsafe l
OSV
CVE-2022-50648: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller Naveen r
osv·2025-12-09
CVE-2022-50648 CVE-2022-50648: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller Naveen r
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller Naveen reported recursive locking of direct_mutex with sample ftrace-direct-modify.ko: [ 74.762406] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 74.762887] 6.0.0-rc6+ #33 Not tainted [ 74.763216] -------------------------------------------- [ 74.763672] event-sample-fn/1084 is trying to acquire lock: [ 74.764152] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \ register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.764922] [ 74.764922] but task is already holding lock: [ 74.765421] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \ modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0 [ 74.766142] [ 74.766142] other info that might help us debug this: [ 74.766701] Possible unsafe l
OSV
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
osv·2025-12-09
CVE-2022-50648 ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
Naveen reported recursive locking of direct_mutex with sample
ftrace-direct-modify.ko:
[ 74.762406] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 74.762887] 6.0.0-rc6+ #33 Not tainted
[ 74.763216] --------------------------------------------
[ 74.763672] event-sample-fn/1084 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 74.764152] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180
[ 74.764922]
[ 74.764922] but task is already holding lock:
[ 74.765421] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0
[ 74.766142]
[ 74.76
GHSA
GHSA-qjqh-pmxv-4qmf: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
Naveen
ghsa_unreviewed·2025-12-09
CVE-2022-50648 GHSA-qjqh-pmxv-4qmf: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
Naveen
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix recursive locking direct_mutex in ftrace_modify_direct_caller
Naveen reported recursive locking of direct_mutex with sample
ftrace-direct-modify.ko:
[ 74.762406] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 74.762887] 6.0.0-rc6+ #33 Not tainted
[ 74.763216] --------------------------------------------
[ 74.763672] event-sample-fn/1084 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 74.764152] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180
[ 74.764922]
[ 74.764922] but task is already holding lock:
[ 74.765421] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \
modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0
[ 74.766142]
[ 74.766142] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 74.766701] Possible unsaf
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
2025-12-09
Published