CVE-2023-39347
published 2023-09-27CVE-2023-39347: Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. An attacker with the ability to update pod labels can cause Cilium…
PriorityP351critical9CVSS 3.1
AVAACLPRLUINSCCHIHAH
EPSS
0.50%
42.0th percentile
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. An attacker with the ability to update pod labels can cause Cilium to apply incorrect network policies. This issue arises due to the fact that on pod update, Cilium incorrectly uses user-provided pod labels to select the policies which apply to the workload in question. This can affect Cilium network policies that use the namespace, service account or cluster constructs to restrict traffic, Cilium clusterwide network policies that use Cilium namespace labels to select the Pod and Kubernetes network policies. Non-existent construct names can be provided, which bypass all network policies applicable to the construct. For example, providing a pod with a non-existent namespace as the value of the `io.kubernetes.pod.namespace` label results in none of the namespaced CiliumNetworkPolicies applying to the pod in question. This attack requires the attacker to have Kubernetes API Server access, as described in the Cilium Threat Model. This issue has been resolved in: Cilium versions 1.14.2, 1.13.7, and 1.12.14. Users are advised to upgrade. As a workaround an admission webhook can be used to prevent pod label updates to the `k8s:io.kubernetes.pod.namespace` and `io.cilium.k8s.policy.*` keys.
Affected
8 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| cilium | cilium | < 1.12.14 | 1.12.14 |
| cilium | cilium | — | — |
| cilium | cilium | — | — |
| cilium | cilium | >= 1.13.0 < 1.13.7 | 1.13.7 |
| cilium | cilium | >= 1.14.0 < 1.14.2 | 1.14.2 |
| github.com | cilium_cilium | >= 0 < 1.12.14 | 1.12.14 |
| github.com | cilium_cilium | >= 1.13.0 < 1.13.7 | 1.13.7 |
| github.com | cilium_cilium | >= 1.14.0 < 1.14.2 | 1.14.2 |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
OSV
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy in github.com/cilium/cilium
osv·2024-08-21
CVE-2023-39347 Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy in github.com/cilium/cilium
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy in github.com/cilium/cilium
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy in github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy
ghsa·2023-09-26
CVE-2023-39347 [MEDIUM] CWE-345 Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy
### Impact
An attacker with the ability to update pod labels can cause Cilium to apply incorrect network policies.
This issue arises due to the fact that on pod update, Cilium incorrectly uses user-provided pod labels to select the policies which apply to the workload in question.
This can affect:
* Cilium network policies that use the namespace, service account or cluster constructs to restrict traffic
* Cilium clusterwide network policies that use Cilium namespace labels to select the Pod
* Kubernetes network policies
Non-existent construct names can be provided, which bypass all network policies applicable to the construct. For example, providing a pod with a non-existent namespace as the value of the `io.kubernetes.p
OSV
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy
osv·2023-09-26
CVE-2023-39347 [MEDIUM] Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy
### Impact
An attacker with the ability to update pod labels can cause Cilium to apply incorrect network policies.
This issue arises due to the fact that on pod update, Cilium incorrectly uses user-provided pod labels to select the policies which apply to the workload in question.
This can affect:
* Cilium network policies that use the namespace, service account or cluster constructs to restrict traffic
* Cilium clusterwide network policies that use Cilium namespace labels to select the Pod
* Kubernetes network policies
Non-existent construct names can be provided, which bypass all network policies applicable to the construct. For example, providing a pod with a non-existent namespace as the value of the `io.kubernetes.p
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
https://docs.cilium.io/en/latest/security/threat-model/#kubernetes-api-server-attackerhttps://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-gj2r-phwg-6rwwhttps://docs.cilium.io/en/latest/security/threat-model/#kubernetes-api-server-attackerhttps://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-gj2r-phwg-6rww
2023-09-27
Published