CVE-2023-5679
published 2024-02-13CVE-2023-5679: A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these features…
PriorityP341high7.5CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
1.24%
66.1th percentile
A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these features are enabled.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.45, 9.18.0 through 9.18.21, 9.19.0 through 9.19.19, 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.45-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.21-S1.
Affected
42 ranges· showing 25
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | bind9 | < bind9 1:9.18.24-1 (bookworm) | bind9 1:9.18.24-1 (bookworm) |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| fedoraproject | fedora | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | — | — |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.16.48-r0 | 9.16.48-r0 |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.18.24-r0 | 9.18.24-r0 |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.18.24-r0 | 9.18.24-r0 |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.18.24-r0 | 9.18.24-r0 |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.18.24-r0 | 9.18.24-r0 |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.18.24-r0 | 9.18.24-r0 |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.18.24-r0 | 9.18.24-r0 |
| isc | bind | >= 0 < 9.18.24-r0 | 9.18.24-r0 |
| isc | bind | 9.16.12 – 9.16.45 | — |
| isc | bind | 9.18.0 – 9.18.21 | — |
| isc | bind | 9.19.0 – 9.19.19 | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.17.5HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
osv7.5HIGH
vendor_debian7.5HIGH
vendor_msrc7.5HIGH
vendor_redhat7.5HIGH
vendor_ubuntu7.5HIGH
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
CISA ICS
Siemens SINEC INS
cisa_ics·2024-11-14
Siemens SINEC INS
ICS Advisory
##
Siemens SINEC INS
Release DateNovember 14, 2024
Alert CodeICSA-24-319-08
Related topics:
Industrial Control System Vulnerabilities, Industrial Control Systems
As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories (CERT Services | Services | Siemens Global).
View CSAF
## 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- CVSS v3 9.9
- ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity/public exploits are available/known public exploitation
- Vendor: Siemens
- Equipment: SINEC INS
- Vulnerabilities: Improper Authentication, Out-of-bounds Write, Ineffici
Red Hat
bind9: Enabling both DNS64 and serve-stale may cause an assertion failure during recursive resolution
vendor_redhat·2024-02-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2023-5679 [HIGH] CWE-617 bind9: Enabling both DNS64 and serve-stale may cause an assertion failure during recursive resolution
bind9: Enabling both DNS64 and serve-stale may cause an assertion failure during recursive resolution
A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these features are enabled.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.45, 9.18.0 through 9.18.21, 9.19.0 through 9.19.19, 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.45-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.21-S1.
A flaw was found in the bind package. This issue may allow an attacker to query in a DNS64 enabled resolver node with a domain name triggering a server-stale data, triggering a code assertion, and resulting in a crash of `named` processes. This can allow a remote unauthenticated user to cause a Denial Of Service in the DNS server.
Statement: The id
Microsoft
Enabling both DNS64 and serve-stale may cause an assertion failure during recursive resolution
vendor_msrc·2024-02-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2023-5679 [HIGH] Enabling both DNS64 and serve-stale may cause an assertion failure during recursive resolution
Enabling both DNS64 and serve-stale may cause an assertion failure during recursive resolution
FAQ: Is Azure Linux the only Microsoft product that includes this open-source library and is therefore potentially affected by this vulnerability?
One of the main benefits to our customers who choose to use the Azure Linux distro is the commitment to keep it up to date with the most recent and most secure versions of the open source libraries with which the distro is composed. Microsoft is committed to transparency in this work which is why we began publishing CSAF/VEX in October 2025. See this blog post for more information. If impact to additional products is identified, we will update the CVE to reflect this.
Mariner: Mariner
isc: isc
Customer Action Required: Yes
Remediation: CBL-Mariner
Ubuntu
Bind vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2024-02-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2023-5517 [HIGH] Bind vulnerabilities
Title: Bind vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in Bind.
Shoham Danino, Anat Bremler-Barr, Yehuda Afek, and Yuval Shavitt discovered
that Bind incorrectly handled parsing large DNS messages. A remote attacker
could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to consume resources, leading
to a denial of service. (CVE-2023-4408)
Elias Heftrig, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel, and Michael Waidner discovered
that Bind icorrectly handled validating DNSSEC messages. A remote attacker
could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to consume resources, leading
to a denial of service. (CVE-2023-50387)
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled preparing an NSEC3 closest
encloser proof. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
Bind to consume resources, leading
Debian
CVE-2023-5679: bind9 - A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with ...
vendor_debian·2023·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2023-5679 [HIGH] CVE-2023-5679: bind9 - A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with ...
A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these features are enabled. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.45, 9.18.0 through 9.18.21, 9.19.0 through 9.19.19, 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.45-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.21-S1.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved (fixed in 1:9.18.24-1)
bullseye: resolved (fixed in 1:9.16.48-1)
forky: resolved (fixed in 1:9.19.21-1)
sid: resolved (fixed in 1:9.19.21-1)
trixie: resolved (fixed in 1:9.19.21-1)
OSV
CVE-2023-5679: A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these f
osv·2024-02-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2023-5679 [HIGH] CVE-2023-5679: A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these f
A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these features are enabled. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.45, 9.18.0 through 9.18.21, 9.19.0 through 9.19.19, 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.45-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.21-S1.
GHSA
GHSA-v5qp-mx94-j49v: A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these f
ghsa_unreviewed·2024-02-13
CVE-2023-5679 [HIGH] CWE-617 GHSA-v5qp-mx94-j49v: A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these f
A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these features are enabled.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.45, 9.18.0 through 9.18.21, 9.19.0 through 9.19.19, 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.45-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.21-S1.
OSV
bind9 vulnerabilities
osv·2024-02-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2023-4408 [HIGH] bind9 vulnerabilities
bind9 vulnerabilities
Shoham Danino, Anat Bremler-Barr, Yehuda Afek, and Yuval Shavitt discovered
that Bind incorrectly handled parsing large DNS messages. A remote attacker
could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to consume resources, leading
to a denial of service. (CVE-2023-4408)
Elias Heftrig, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel, and Michael Waidner discovered
that Bind icorrectly handled validating DNSSEC messages. A remote attacker
could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to consume resources, leading
to a denial of service. (CVE-2023-50387)
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled preparing an NSEC3 closest
encloser proof. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
Bind to consume resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2023-50868)
It was discovered
OSV
CVE-2023-5679: A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these f
osv·2024-02-13·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2023-5679 [HIGH] CVE-2023-5679: A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these f
A bad interaction between DNS64 and serve-stale may cause `named` to crash with an assertion failure during recursive resolution, when both of these features are enabled.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.45, 9.18.0 through 9.18.21, 9.19.0 through 9.19.19, 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.45-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.21-S1.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/02/13/1https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2023-5679https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HVRDSJVZKMCXKKPP6PNR62T7RWZ3YSDZ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PNNHZSZPG2E7NBMBNYPGHCFI4V4XRWNQ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RGS7JN6FZXUSTC2XKQHH27574XOULYYJ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZDZFMEKQTZ4L7RY46FCENWFB5MDT263R/https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240426-0002/http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/02/13/1https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2023-5679https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HVRDSJVZKMCXKKPP6PNR62T7RWZ3YSDZ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PNNHZSZPG2E7NBMBNYPGHCFI4V4XRWNQ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RGS7JN6FZXUSTC2XKQHH27574XOULYYJ/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZDZFMEKQTZ4L7RY46FCENWFB5MDT263R/https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240426-0002/
2024-02-13
Published