CVE-2024-32922
published 2024-06-13CVE-2024-32922: In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power.c, there is a possible compromise of protected memory due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to…
PriorityP338high7.4CVSS 3.1
AVLACHPRNUINSUCHIHAH
EPSS
0.08%
0.2th percentile
In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power.c, there is a possible compromise of protected memory due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege to TEE with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| android | — | — |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-m6mc-7v83-pmpx: In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power
ghsa_unreviewed·2024-06-13
CVE-2024-32922 [HIGH] CWE-843 GHSA-m6mc-7v83-pmpx: In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power
In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power.c, there is a possible compromise of protected memory due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege to TEE with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
OSV
CVE-2024-32922: In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power
osv·2024-06-01
CVE-2024-32922 CVE-2024-32922: In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power
In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power.c, there is a possible compromise of protected memory due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege to TEE with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
2024-06-13
Published