CVE-2024-42233
published 2024-08-07CVE-2024-42233: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock() The vmf->ptl in…
PriorityP49low3.3CVSS 3.1
AVLACLPRLUINSUCNILAN
EPSS
0.19%
9.2th percentile
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from
handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte).
After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table
may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual page
table. Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with
pte_offset_map_nolock().
As David said, the PTL pointer might be stale so if we continue to use
it infilemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(), it might trigger UAF. Also, if
the PTL fails, the issue fixed by commit 58f327f2ce80 ("filemap: avoid
unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()") might reappear.
Affected
7 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | linux | < linux 6.9.10-1 (forky) | linux 6.9.10-1 (forky) |
| linux | linux | — | — |
| linux | linux | >= 58f327f2ce80f9c7b4a70e9cf017ae8810d44a20 < 6a6c2aec1a89506595801b4cf7e8eef035f33748 | 6a6c2aec1a89506595801b4cf7e8eef035f33748 |
| linux | linux | >= 58f327f2ce80f9c7b4a70e9cf017ae8810d44a20 < 24be02a42181f0707be0498045c4c4b13273b16d | 24be02a42181f0707be0498045c4c4b13273b16d |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.9.10-1 | 6.9.10-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.9.10-1 | 6.9.10-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 6.9 < 6.9.10 | 6.9.10 |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.13.3LOWCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
osv3.3LOW
vendor_debian3.3LOW
vendor_redhat3.3LOW
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Red Hat
kernel: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
vendor_redhat·2024-08-07·CVSS 3.3
CVE-2024-42233 [LOW] CWE-99 kernel: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
kernel: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from
handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte).
After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table
may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual page
table. Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with
pte_offset_map_nolock().
As David said, the PTL pointer might be stale so if we continue to use
it infilemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(), it might trigger UAF. Also, if
the PTL fails, the issue fixed by commit 58f327f2ce80 ("filemap: avoid
unnecessary major faults
Debian
CVE-2024-42233: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: filemap: re...
vendor_debian·2024·CVSS 3.3
CVE-2024-42233 [LOW] CVE-2024-42233: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: filemap: re...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock() The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte). After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual page table. Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock(). As David said, the PTL pointer might be stale so if we continue to use it infilemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(), it might trigger UAF. Also, if the PTL fails, the issue fixed by commit 58f327f2ce80 ("filemap: avoid unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()") might reappear.
Scope: local
bookworm: resolved
bu
GHSA
GHSA-2rr5-68hg-rwmh: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
The vmf->ptl in f
ghsa_unreviewed·2024-08-07
CVE-2024-42233 [LOW] GHSA-2rr5-68hg-rwmh: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
The vmf->ptl in f
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from
handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte).
After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table
may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual page
table. Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with
pte_offset_map_nolock().
As David said, the PTL pointer might be stale so if we continue to use
it infilemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(), it might trigger UAF. Also, if
the PTL fails, the issue fixed by commit 58f327f2ce80 ("filemap: avoid
unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()") might reappear.
OSV
CVE-2024-42233: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock() The vmf->ptl in fil
osv·2024-08-07·CVSS 3.3
CVE-2024-42233 [LOW] CVE-2024-42233: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock() The vmf->ptl in fil
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock() The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte). After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual page table. Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock(). As David said, the PTL pointer might be stale so if we continue to use it infilemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(), it might trigger UAF. Also, if the PTL fails, the issue fixed by commit 58f327f2ce80 ("filemap: avoid unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()") might reappear.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
2024-08-07
Published