CVE-2024-47575
published 2024-10-23CVE-2024-47575: A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7.6.0, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiManager 7.0.0…
PriorityP1100critical9.8CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSUCHIHAH
KEVITWEXPLOITInitial access
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilitydue 2024-11-13
Exploited in the wild
EPSS
94.76%
99.8th percentile
A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7.6.0, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, FortiManager 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiManager 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.12, FortiManager Cloud 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Affected
18 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| fortinet | fortimanager | — | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager | — | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager | >= 6.2.0 < 6.2.13 | 6.2.13 |
| fortinet | fortimanager | 6.2.0 – 6.2.12 | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager | >= 6.4.0 < 6.4.15 | 6.4.15 |
| fortinet | fortimanager | 6.4.0 – 6.4.14 | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager | >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.13 | 7.0.13 |
| fortinet | fortimanager | 7.0.0 – 7.0.12 | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager | >= 7.2.0 < 7.2.8 | 7.2.8 |
| fortinet | fortimanager | 7.2.0 – 7.2.7 | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager | >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.5 | 7.4.5 |
| fortinet | fortimanager | 7.4.0 – 7.4.4 | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager_cloud | 6.4.1 – 6.4.7 | — |
| fortinet | fortimanager_cloud | >= 7.0.1 < 7.0.13 | 7.0.13 |
| fortinet | fortimanager_cloud | >= 7.2.1 < 7.2.8 | 7.2.8 |
| fortinet | fortimanager_cloud | >= 7.4.1 < 7.4.5 | 7.4.5 |
| fortinet | fortimanagercloud | — | — |
| fortinet | fortinet | — | — |
Detection & IOCsextracted from sources · hover to see the quote
- →Look for log entries showing an unregistered device named 'localhost' being added to FortiManager via the DVM subsystem — this is the attacker registering their rogue FortiGate device. ↗
- →Look for log entries showing device settings being edited for the rogue serial number FMG-VMTM23017412, indicating post-exploitation API activity. ↗
- →Check for the presence of /tmp/.tm and /var/tmp/.tm files on FortiManager systems; these are gzip archives used to stage exfiltrated data. ↗
- →Monitor for attacker-controlled FortiGate/FortiManager-VM devices registering to exposed FortiManager servers from the observed Vultr-hosted IPs, particularly 45.32.41.202 which was the first observed attack source. ↗
- →IP 104.238.141.143 has been recently associated with SuperShell C2 infrastructure; treat any FortiManager connections to/from this IP as high-severity. ↗
- →Check /fds/data/subs.dat for attacker-controlled device registration artifacts including serial number, user ID, company name, and email address. ↗
- →Exploitation requires a valid FortiGate certificate; monitor for unexpected or unknown FortiGate devices appearing in the Unregistered Devices section of FortiManager. ↗
- ·The Fortinet advisory is noted to be missing a critical exploitation prerequisite: attackers must first obtain a valid certificate from any owned or compromised Fortinet device (including FortiManager VM) before exploiting the authentication bypass. ↗
- ·The 'set fgfm-deny-unknown enable' workaround prevents unknown serial numbers from registering but does NOT fully remediate the vulnerability — if an attacker obtains a valid certificate, they may still exploit the flaw. ↗
- ·Fortinet confirmed no malware or backdoors were installed on compromised FortiManager systems and no database modifications or changes to managed devices were observed, but stolen config data (IPs, credentials, FortiOS256-hashed passwords) could enable downstream attacks. ↗
- ·Not all IOCs will be present on every exploited device; absence of listed indicators does not confirm a system is clean. ↗
- ·The FGFM protocol's NAT traversal design means a compromised managed FortiGate can be used to traverse up to the managing FortiManager and then laterally to other managed firewalls and networks — MSP environments are at elevated risk. ↗
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.19.8CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vulncheck9.8CRITICAL
cisa9.8CRITICAL
CVEs like this are exactly what “Exploited This Week” covers.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-hx4q-76p6-78cc: A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7
ghsa_unreviewed·2024-10-23
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] CWE-306 GHSA-hx4q-76p6-78cc: A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7
A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7.6.0, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, FortiManager 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiManager 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.13, FortiManager Cloud 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
VulnCheck
Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication Vulnerability
vulncheck·2024·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] CWE-306 Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication Vulnerability
Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication Vulnerability
Fortinet FortiManager contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the fgfmd daemon that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Affected: Fortinet FortiManager
Required Action: Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Exploitation References: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/fortimanager-zero-day-exploitation-cve-2024-47575; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json; https://www.fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-423; https://www.runzero.com/blog/fortinet-fortimanager/; https://darktrace.com/blog/post-exploitation-activities
Fortinet
Missing authentication in fgfmsd
vendor_fortinet·2024-10-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] CWE-306 Missing authentication in fgfmsd
FG-IR-24-423: Missing authentication in fgfmsd
A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7.6.0, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, FortiManager 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiManager 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.12, FortiManager Cloud 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
CVEs: CVE-2024-47575
CWEs: CWE-306
CVSS: 9.8 (critical)
Affected products: FortiManager, FortiManagercloud, Fortinet
CISA
Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication Vulnerability
cisa·2024-10-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] CWE-306 Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication Vulnerability
Vulnerability: Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication Vulnerability
Affected: Fortinet FortiManager
Fortinet FortiManager contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the fgfmd daemon that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Required Action: Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Notes: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-423 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47575
Remediation Due Date: 2024-11-13
Suricata
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager File Transfer Handle Response
suricata·2024-11-18·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager File Transfer Handle Response
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager File Transfer Handle Response
Rule: alert tcp $HOME_NET 541 -> any any (msg:"ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager File Transfer Handle Response"; flow:established,to_client; flowbits:isset,ET.FMFG_CVE-2024-47575; content:"|36 e0 11 00|"; startswith; content:"action|3d|ack"; fast_pattern; distance:4; content:"localid|3d|"; content:"remoteid|3d|"; reference:url,labs.watchtowr.com/hop-skip-fortijump-fortijumphigher-cve-2024-23113-cve-2024-47575/; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:2057691; rev:1; metadata:affected_product FortiManager, attack_target Server, tls_state TLSDecrypt, created_at 2024_11_18, cve CVE_2024_47575, deployment Perimeter, deployment Internal, deployment SSLDecrypt, confidence High, signature_severity Major, tag Exploit, tag CISA_KEV, updated_at 2
Suricata
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M1
suricata·2024-11-18·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M1
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M1
Rule: alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 541 (msg:"ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M1"; flow:established,to_server; content:"|36 e0 11 00|"; startswith; content:"channel|0d 0a|"; distance:4; content:"remoteid|3d|"; content:"/som/export"; fast_pattern; content:"|22|file|22 3a|"; pcre:"/^.*?[\x3b\x0a\x26\x60\x7c\x24]/R"; reference:url,labs.watchtowr.com/hop-skip-fortijump-fortijumphigher-cve-2024-23113-cve-2024-47575/; reference:cve,2024-47575; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:2057692; rev:1; metadata:affected_product FortiManager, attack_target Server, tls_state TLSDecrypt, created_at 2024_11_18, cve CVE_2024_47575, deployment Perimeter, deployment In
Suricata
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M2
suricata·2024-11-18·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M2
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M2
Rule: alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 541 (msg:"ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-47575) M2"; flow:established,to_server; content:"|36 e0 11 00|"; startswith; content:"channel|0d 0a|"; fast_pattern; distance:4; content:"remoteid|3d|"; content:"|0d 0a 0d 0a 00|"; isdataat:1,relative; reference:url,attackerkb.com/topics/OFBGprmpIE/cve-2024-47575/rapid7-analysis; reference:cve,2024-47575; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:2057694; rev:1; metadata:affected_product FortiManager, attack_target Server, tls_state TLSDecrypt, created_at 2024_11_18, cve CVE_2024_47575, deployment Perimeter, deployment Internal, deployment SSLDecrypt, confidence High, signature_severi
Suricata
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Get File Transfer Handle
suricata·2024-11-18·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Get File Transfer Handle
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Get File Transfer Handle
Rule: alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 541 (msg:"ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Get File Transfer Handle"; flow:established,to_server; flowbits:set,ET.FMFG_CVE-2024-47575; content:"|36 e0 11 00|"; startswith; content:"get file_exchange|0d 0a|"; fast_pattern; distance:4; reference:url,labs.watchtowr.com/hop-skip-fortijump-fortijumphigher-cve-2024-23113-cve-2024-47575/; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:2057690; rev:1; metadata:affected_product FortiManager, attack_target Server, tls_state TLSDecrypt, created_at 2024_11_18, cve CVE_2024_47575, deployment Perimeter, deployment Internal, deployment SSLDecrypt, confidence High, signature_severity Major, tag Exploit, tag CISA_KEV, updated_at 2024_11_18, mitre
Suricata
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Open Server-Side Channel
suricata·2024-11-18·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Open Server-Side Channel
ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Open Server-Side Channel
Rule: alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 541 (msg:"ET EXPLOIT Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated Open Server-Side Channel"; flow:established,to_server; flowbits:set,ET.FMFG_CVE-2024-47575; content:"|36 e0 11 00|"; startswith; content:"get connect_tcp|0d 0a|"; fast_pattern; distance:4; content:"tcp_port|3d|rsh"; content:"cmd|3d 2f|bin|2f|sh"; content:"localid|3d|0"; reference:url,attackerkb.com/topics/OFBGprmpIE/cve-2024-47575/rapid7-analysis; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:2057693; rev:1; metadata:affected_product FortiManager, attack_target Server, tls_state TLSDecrypt, created_at 2024_11_18, cve CVE_2024_47575, deployment Perimeter, deployment Internal, deployment SSLDecrypt, confidence High, signature_severity Maj
Nuclei
FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
nuclei·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
A missing authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests to the fgfmd daemon. This vulnerability affects FortiManager versions 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, and all versions of 6.0.
Template:
id: CVE-2024-47575
info:
name: FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
author: 0x_Akoko,pussycat0x,watchTowr
severity: critical
description: |
A missing authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests to the fgfmd daemon. Th
Metasploit
Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated RCE
metasploit
Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated RCE
Fortinet FortiManager Unauthenticated RCE
This module exploits a missing authentication vulnerability affecting FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud devices to achieve unauthenticated RCE with root privileges. The vulnerable FortiManager versions are: * 7.6.0 * 7.4.0 through 7.4.4 * 7.2.0 through 7.2.7 * 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 * 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 * 6.2.0 through 6.2.12 The vulnerable FortiManager Cloud versions are: * 7.4.1 through 7.4.4 * 7.2.1 through 7.2.7 * 7.0.1 through 7.0.12 * 6.4 (all versions).
Tenable
Verizon 2025 DBIR: Tenable Research Collaboration Shines a Spotlight on CVE Remediation Trends
blogs_tenable·2025-04-23
Verizon 2025 DBIR: Tenable Research Collaboration Shines a Spotlight on CVE Remediation Trends
## Cloud Exposure
Tenable Cloud Security (CNAPP) Request a demo
Tenable Cloud Vulnerability Management Request a demo
Tenable CIEM Request a demo
Secure your cloud
## Vulnerability Exposure
Tenable Vulnerability Management Try for free
Tenable Security Center Request a demo
Tenable Web App Scanning Try for free
Tenable Patch Management Request a demo
Tenable Enclave Security Request a demo
Tenable Attack Surface Management Request a demo
Tenable Nessus Try for free
## AI Exposure
Tenable AI Exposure Request a demo
## OT/IoT Exposure
Tenable OT Security Request a demo
## Identity Exposure
Tenable Identity Exposure Request a demo
## Business needs
Active Directory
AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)
AWS security
Azure security
Cloud Security Posture Man
Bleepingcomputer
Critical FortiSwitch flaw lets hackers change admin passwords remotely
blogs_bleepingcomputer·2025-04-09·CVSS 7.5
CVE-2024-48887 [HIGH] Critical FortiSwitch flaw lets hackers change admin passwords remotely
## Critical FortiSwitch flaw lets hackers change admin passwords remotely
## Sergiu Gatlan
Fortinet has released security patches for a critical vulnerability in its FortiSwitch devices that can be exploited to change administrator passwords remotely.
The company says Daniel Rozeboom of the FortiSwitch web UI development team discovered the vulnerability ( CVE-2024-48887 ) internally.
Unauthenticated attackers can exploit this unverified FortiSwitch GUI password change security flaw (rated with a 9.8/10 severity score) in low-complexity attacks that don't require user interaction.
Fortinet says threat actors can change credentials using a specially crafted request sent via the set_password endpoint.
"An unverified password change vulnerability [CWE-620] in FortiSwitch GUI may allow a
Bleepingcomputer
Fortinet warns of auth bypass zero-day exploited to hijack firewalls
blogs_bleepingcomputer·2025-01-14·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-55591 [CRITICAL] Fortinet warns of auth bypass zero-day exploited to hijack firewalls
## Fortinet warns of auth bypass zero-day exploited to hijack firewalls
## Sergiu Gatlan
Attackers are exploiting a new authentication bypass zero-day vulnerability in FortiOS and FortiProxy to hijack Fortinet firewalls and breach enterprise networks.
This security flaw (tracked as CVE-2024-55591 ) impacts FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.16, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.19, and FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.12. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to gain super-admin privileges by making malicious requests to the Node.js websocket module.
Fortinet says attackers exploiting the zero-day in the wild are creating randomly generated admin or local users on compromised devices and are adding them to existing SSL VPN user groups or to new ones they also add.
They've also been observed a
Wiz
Crying Out Cloud - November 2024 Newsletter | Wiz
blogs_wiz·2024-11-01·CVSS 7.2
[HIGH] Crying Out Cloud - November 2024 Newsletter | Wiz
Welcome back! This month we’ve seen a lot of action, with both vulnerabilities and security incidents that have left users affected. We bring you the latest cloud security highlights, to help you stay informed and stay secure. Let's dive in.
Here are our top picks!
## 🔍 Highlights
Supply Chain Attack on lottie-player
On October 30, 2024, a supply chain attack was initiated against the popular JavaScript library lottie-player, injecting malicious code that populates a Web3 wallet connection prompt on legitimate websites using the library, potentially targeting prominent cryptocurrency platforms and other high-traffic websites. The compromised versions of lottie-player were later removed from major CDNs and npm, but websites still using compromised versions of the library remain affected.
Checkpoint
28th October – Threat Intelligence Report
blogs_checkpoint·2024-10-28
CVE-2024-20481 28th October – Threat Intelligence Report
Latest Publications
CPR Podcast Channel
AI Research
Web 3.0 Security
Intelligence Reports
ThreatCloud AI
Threat Intelligence & Research
Zero Day Protection
Sandblast File Analysis
About Us
SUBSCRIBE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
## 28th October – Threat Intelligence Report
For the latest discoveries in cyber research for the week of 28th October, please download our Threat Intelligence Bulletin .
TOP ATTACKS AND BREACHES
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte (OMA), operator of 13 airports across Mexico, was hacked by the RansomHub ransomware gang, who threatened to leak 3TB of stolen data unless a ransom is paid. The attack disrupted terminal information screens and forced OMA to activate backup systems, with no reported material adverse e
Bleepingcomputer
Mandiant says new Fortinet flaw has been exploited since June
blogs_bleepingcomputer·2024-10-24·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] Mandiant says new Fortinet flaw has been exploited since June
## Mandiant says new Fortinet flaw has been exploited since June
## Lawrence Abrams
A new Fortinet FortiManager flaw dubbed "FortiJump" and tracked as CVE-2024-47575 has been exploited since June 2024 in zero-day attacks on over 50 servers, according to a new report by Mandiant.
For the past ten days, rumors of an actively exploited FortiManager zero-day have been circulating online after Fortinet privately notified customers in an advanced notification security advisory.
Today, Fortinet finally disclosed FortiManager vulnerability , stating it was a missing authentication flaw in the Fortinet created the " FortiGate to FortiManager Protocol " (FGFM) API that allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute commands on the server and managed FortiGate devices.
Threat actors could exploit
Bleepingcomputer
Fortinet warns of new critical FortiManager flaw used in zero-day attacks
blogs_bleepingcomputer·2024-10-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] Fortinet warns of new critical FortiManager flaw used in zero-day attacks
## Fortinet warns of new critical FortiManager flaw used in zero-day attacks
## Lawrence Abrams
Fortinet publicly disclosed today a critical FortiManager API vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-47575, that was exploited in zero-day attacks to steal sensitive files containing configurations, IP addresses, and credentials for managed devices.
The company privately warned FortiManager customers about the flaw starting October 13th in advanced notification emails seen by BleepingComputer that contained steps to mitigate the flaw until a security update was released.
However, news of the vulnerability began leaking online throughout the week by customers on Reddit and by cybersecurity researcher Kevin Beaumont on Mastodon, who calls this flaw "FortiJump."
Fortinet device admins have also sh
Tenable
CVE-2024-47575: Frequently Asked Questions About FortiJump Zero-Day in FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud
blogs_tenable·2024-10-23·CVSS 9.8
[CRITICAL] CVE-2024-47575: Frequently Asked Questions About FortiJump Zero-Day in FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud
## Cloud Exposure
Tenable Cloud Security (CNAPP) Request a demo
Tenable Cloud Vulnerability Management Request a demo
Tenable CIEM Request a demo
Secure your cloud
## Vulnerability Exposure
Tenable Vulnerability Management Try for free
Tenable Security Center Request a demo
Tenable Web App Scanning Try for free
Tenable Patch Management Request a demo
Tenable Enclave Security Request a demo
Tenable Attack Surface Management Request a demo
Tenable Nessus Try for free
## AI Exposure
Tenable AI Exposure Request a demo
## OT/IoT Exposure
Tenable OT Security Request a demo
## Identity Exposure
Tenable Identity Exposure Request a demo
## Business needs
Active Directory
AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)
AWS security
Azure security
Cloud Security Posture Man
Greynoiseio
NoiseLetter November 2024
blogs_greynoiseio
NoiseLetter November 2024
CVE Disclosure Early Warning Get an early warning when traffic spikes indicate a high likelihood of new disclosures
Compromised Asset Detection Find out immediately if an asset communicates with a malicious IP address
Vulnerability Prioritization Get real-time insight into active exploitation trends to better understand risk and severity
SOC Efficiency Filter out noisy, low priority and false-positive alerts from mass internet scanners
Incident Investigation Add context to incidents to speed the determinations of scope and timelines
Threat Hunting Quickly identify anomalous behavior and enrich your threat hunting campaigns
Why GreyNoise
CVE Disclosure Early Warning Get an early warning when traffic spikes indicate a high likelihood of new disclosures
Compromised Asset Detection Fin
Threat Intel
UNC5820
threat_intel·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-47575 [CRITICAL] UNC5820
# Threat Actor: UNC5820
## Description
UNC5820 is a threat actor exploiting the CVE-2024-47575 vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiManager, allowing them to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary commands. They have been observed exfiltrating configuration data, user information, and FortiOS256-hashed passwords from managed FortiGate devices. While the actor has staged and exfiltrated sensitive data, there is currently no evidence of lateral movement or further compromise of additional environments. Mandiant has not determined whether UNC5820 is state-sponsored or identified its geographic location.
Greynoiseio
Storm⚡️Watch
blogs_greynoiseio
Storm⚡️Watch
CVE Disclosure Early Warning Get an early warning when traffic spikes indicate a high likelihood of new disclosures
Compromised Asset Detection Find out immediately if an asset communicates with a malicious IP address
Vulnerability Prioritization Get real-time insight into active exploitation trends to better understand risk and severity
SOC Efficiency Filter out noisy, low priority and false-positive alerts from mass internet scanners
Incident Investigation Add context to incidents to speed the determinations of scope and timelines
Threat Hunting Quickly identify anomalous behavior and enrich your threat hunting campaigns
Why GreyNoise
CVE Disclosure Early Warning Get an early warning when traffic spikes indicate a high likelihood of new disclosures
Compromised Asset Detection Fin
arXiv
SandboxEval: Towards Securing Test Environment for Untrusted Code
arxiv_fulltext·2025-03-27
SandboxEval: Towards Securing Test Environment for Untrusted Code
SandboxEval: Towards Securing Test Environment for Untrusted Code
Rafiqul Rabin
[email protected]
Jesse Hostetler
[email protected]
Sean McGregor
[email protected]
Digital Safety Research Institute
UL Research Institutes
Brett Weir
[email protected]
Nick Judd
[email protected]
## Abstract
While large language models (LLMs) are powerful assistants in programming tasks, they may also produce malicious code. Testing LLM-generated code therefore poses significant risks to assessment infrastructure tasked with executing untrusted code. To address these risks, this work focuses on evaluating the security and confidentiality properties of test environments, reducing the risk that LLM-generated code may compromise the assessment infrastructure. We introduce SandboxEval, a t
2024-10-23
Published
2024-10-23
Added to CISA KEV
Exploited in the wild