CVE-2024-49932
published 2024-10-21CVE-2024-49932: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST On relocation we're doing readahead on…
PriorityP420medium5.5CVSS 3.1
AVLACLPRLUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
0.20%
10.3th percentile
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
On relocation we're doing readahead on the relocation inode, but if the
filesystem is backed by a RAID stripe tree we can get ENOENT (e.g. due to
preallocated extents not being mapped in the RST) from the lookup.
But readahead doesn't handle the error and submits invalid reads to the
device, causing an assertion in the scatter-gather list code:
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): balance: start -d -m -s
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): relocating block group 6480920576 flags data|raid0
BTRFS error (device nvme1n1): cannot find raid-stripe for logical [6481928192, 6481969152] devid 2, profile raid0
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:115!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 1012 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #567
RIP: 0010:__blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0
RSP: 0018:ffffc90001a43820 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffea00045d4802
RDX: 0000000117520000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881027d1000
RBP: 0000000000003000 R08: ffffea00045d4902 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8881003d10b8
R13: ffffc90001a438f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000003000
FS: 00007fcc048a6900(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000002cd11000 CR3: 00000001109ea001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
Call Trace:
? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x25
? die+0x2e/0x50
? do_trap+0xca/0x110
? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80
? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0
? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0
nvme_prep_rq.part.0+0x9d/0x770
nvme_queue_rq+0x7d/0x1e0
__blk_mq_issue_directly+0x2a/0x90
? blk_mq_get_budget_and_tag+0x61/0x90
blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly+0x56/0xf0
blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x52b/0x5d0
__blk_flush_plug+0xc6/0x110
Affected
21 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | linux | < linux 6.11.4-1 (forky) | linux 6.11.4-1 (forky) |
| linux | linux | — | — |
| linux | linux | >= 10e27980f2ff66ba0c6da55f33b4814d5bc86573 < f7a1218a983ab98aba140dc20b25f60b39ee4033 | f7a1218a983ab98aba140dc20b25f60b39ee4033 |
| linux | linux | >= 10e27980f2ff66ba0c6da55f33b4814d5bc86573 < 04915240e2c3a018e4c7f23418478d27226c8957 | 04915240e2c3a018e4c7f23418478d27226c8957 |
| linux | linux_kernel | < 6.11.3 | 6.11.3 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.11.4-1 | 6.11.4-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.11.4-1 | 6.11.4-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.11.0-18.18 | 6.11.0-18.18 |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.104.2-4_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.112.1-2_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.117.1-1_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.119.3-1_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.119.3-3_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.121.1-1_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.126.1-1_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.130.1-3_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.96.2-1_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | azl3_kernel_6.6.96.2-2_on_azure_linux_3.0 | — | — |
| msrc | cbl2_kernel_5.15.186.1-1_on_cbl_mariner_2.0 | — | — |
| msrc | cbl2_kernel_5.15.200.1-1_on_cbl_mariner_2.0 | — | — |
| msrc | cbl2_kernel_5.15.202.1-1_on_cbl_mariner_2.0 | — | — |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.15.5MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
osv5.5MEDIUM
vendor_debian5.5LOW
vendor_msrc5.5MEDIUM
vendor_redhat5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Ubuntu
Linux kernel vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2025-02-28
CVE-2024-47738 Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Title: Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in the Linux kernel.
Attila Szász discovered that the HFS+ file system implementation in the
Linux Kernel contained a heap overflow vulnerability. An attacker could use
a specially crafted file system image that, when mounted, could cause a
denial of service (system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2025-0927)
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
- ARM32 architecture;
- ARM64 architecture;
- PowerPC architecture;
- RISC-V architecture;
- S390 architecture;
- SuperH RISC architecture;
- User-Mode Linux (UML);
- x86 architecture;
- Block layer subsystem;
-
Ubuntu
Linux kernel vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2025-02-19
CVE-2024-47738 Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Title: Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in the Linux kernel.
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
- ARM32 architecture;
- ARM64 architecture;
- PowerPC architecture;
- RISC-V architecture;
- S390 architecture;
- SuperH RISC architecture;
- User-Mode Linux (UML);
- x86 architecture;
- Block layer subsystem;
- Cryptographic API;
- Compute Acceleration Framework;
- ACPI drivers;
- Drivers core;
- ATA over ethernet (AOE) driver;
- RAM backed block device driver;
- Network block device driver;
- Ublk userspace block driver;
- Compressed RAM block device driver;
- Bluetooth drivers;
- TPM device driver;
- Clock fr
Ubuntu
Linux kernel vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2025-02-19
CVE-2024-49996 Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Title: Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Summary: Several security issues were fixed in the Linux kernel.
Attila Szász discovered that the HFS+ file system implementation in the
Linux Kernel contained a heap overflow vulnerability. An attacker could use
a specially crafted file system image that, when mounted, could cause a
denial of service (system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2025-0927)
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
- ARM32 architecture;
- ARM64 architecture;
- PowerPC architecture;
- RISC-V architecture;
- S390 architecture;
- SuperH RISC architecture;
- User-Mode Linux (UML);
- x86 architecture;
- Block layer subsystem;
-
Red Hat
kernel: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
vendor_redhat·2024-10-21·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2024-49932 [MEDIUM] CWE-617 kernel: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
kernel: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
On relocation we're doing readahead on the relocation inode, but if the
filesystem is backed by a RAID stripe tree we can get ENOENT (e.g. due to
preallocated extents not being mapped in the RST) from the lookup.
But readahead doesn't handle the error and submits invalid reads to the
device, causing an assertion in the scatter-gather list code:
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): balance: start -d -m -s
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): relocating block group 6480920576 flags data|raid0
BTRFS error (device nvme1n1): cannot find raid-stripe for logical [6481928192, 6481969152] devid 2, profile raid0
------------[ cut here ]---
Microsoft
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
vendor_msrc·2024-10-08·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2024-49932 [MEDIUM] CWE-617 btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
FAQ: Is Azure Linux the only Microsoft product that includes this open-source library and is therefore potentially affected by this vulnerability?
One of the main benefits to our customers who choose to use the Azure Linux distro is the commitment to keep it up to date with the most recent and most secure versions of the open source libraries with which the distro is composed. Microsoft is committed to transparency in this work which is why we began publishing CSAF/VEX in October 2025. See this blog post for more information. If impact to additional products is identified, we will update the CVE to reflect this.
Mariner: Mariner
Linux: Linux
Customer Action Required: Yes
Debian
CVE-2024-49932: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don'...
vendor_debian·2024·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2024-49932 [MEDIUM] CVE-2024-49932: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don'...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST On relocation we're doing readahead on the relocation inode, but if the filesystem is backed by a RAID stripe tree we can get ENOENT (e.g. due to preallocated extents not being mapped in the RST) from the lookup. But readahead doesn't handle the error and submits invalid reads to the device, causing an assertion in the scatter-gather list code: BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): balance: start -d -m -s BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): relocating block group 6480920576 flags data|raid0 BTRFS error (device nvme1n1): cannot find raid-stripe for logical [6481928192, 6481969152] devid 2, profile raid0 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:115! Oop
OSV
linux-oem-6.11 vulnerabilities
osv·2025-02-28
CVE-2025-0927 linux-oem-6.11 vulnerabilities
linux-oem-6.11 vulnerabilities
Attila Szász discovered that the HFS+ file system implementation in the
Linux Kernel contained a heap overflow vulnerability. An attacker could use
a specially crafted file system image that, when mounted, could cause a
denial of service (system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2025-0927)
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
- ARM32 architecture;
- ARM64 architecture;
- PowerPC architecture;
- RISC-V architecture;
- S390 architecture;
- SuperH RISC architecture;
- User-Mode Linux (UML);
- x86 architecture;
- Block layer subsystem;
- Cryptographic API;
- Compute Acceleration Framework;
- ACPI drivers;
-
OSV
linux-aws, linux-azure, linux-gcp, linux-oracle, linux-raspi, linux-realtime vulnerabilities
osv·2025-02-19
linux-aws, linux-azure, linux-gcp, linux-oracle, linux-raspi, linux-realtime vulnerabilities
linux-aws, linux-azure, linux-gcp, linux-oracle, linux-raspi, linux-realtime vulnerabilities
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
- ARM32 architecture;
- ARM64 architecture;
- PowerPC architecture;
- RISC-V architecture;
- S390 architecture;
- SuperH RISC architecture;
- User-Mode Linux (UML);
- x86 architecture;
- Block layer subsystem;
- Cryptographic API;
- Compute Acceleration Framework;
- ACPI drivers;
- Drivers core;
- ATA over ethernet (AOE) driver;
- RAM backed block device driver;
- Network block device driver;
- Ublk userspace block driver;
- Compressed RAM block device driver;
- Bluetooth drivers;
- TPM device driver;
- Clock framework a
OSV
linux, linux-lowlatency vulnerabilities
osv·2025-02-19
CVE-2025-0927 linux, linux-lowlatency vulnerabilities
linux, linux-lowlatency vulnerabilities
Attila Szász discovered that the HFS+ file system implementation in the
Linux Kernel contained a heap overflow vulnerability. An attacker could use
a specially crafted file system image that, when mounted, could cause a
denial of service (system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2025-0927)
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
- ARM32 architecture;
- ARM64 architecture;
- PowerPC architecture;
- RISC-V architecture;
- S390 architecture;
- SuperH RISC architecture;
- User-Mode Linux (UML);
- x86 architecture;
- Block layer subsystem;
- Cryptographic API;
- Compute Acceleration Framework;
- ACPI d
OSV
CVE-2024-49932: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST On relocation we're doing reada
osv·2024-10-21·CVSS 5.5
CVE-2024-49932 [MEDIUM] CVE-2024-49932: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST On relocation we're doing reada
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST On relocation we're doing readahead on the relocation inode, but if the filesystem is backed by a RAID stripe tree we can get ENOENT (e.g. due to preallocated extents not being mapped in the RST) from the lookup. But readahead doesn't handle the error and submits invalid reads to the device, causing an assertion in the scatter-gather list code: BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): balance: start -d -m -s BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): relocating block group 6480920576 flags data|raid0 BTRFS error (device nvme1n1): cannot find raid-stripe for logical [6481928192, 6481969152] devid 2, profile raid0 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:115! Oop
GHSA
GHSA-ggxf-hwrw-c5q2: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
On relocation we're doing rea
ghsa_unreviewed·2024-10-21
CVE-2024-49932 [MEDIUM] CWE-617 GHSA-ggxf-hwrw-c5q2: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
On relocation we're doing rea
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST
On relocation we're doing readahead on the relocation inode, but if the
filesystem is backed by a RAID stripe tree we can get ENOENT (e.g. due to
preallocated extents not being mapped in the RST) from the lookup.
But readahead doesn't handle the error and submits invalid reads to the
device, causing an assertion in the scatter-gather list code:
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): balance: start -d -m -s
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): relocating block group 6480920576 flags data|raid0
BTRFS error (device nvme1n1): cannot find raid-stripe for logical [6481928192, 6481969152] devid 2, profile raid0
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:115!
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
2024-10-21
Published