CVE-2024-52046
published 2024-12-25CVE-2024-52046: The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security…
PriorityP274critical9.8CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUINSUCHIHAH
EPSS
23.93%
97.6th percentile
The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process
incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows
attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data,
potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks.
This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4.
It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the ObjectSerializationCodecFactory class in the filter chain. If your application is specifically using those classes, you have to upgrade to the latest version of MINA core library.
Upgrading will not be enough: you also need to explicitly allow the classes the decoder will accept in the ObjectSerializationDecoder instance, using one of the three new methods:
/**
* Accept class names where the supplied ClassNameMatcher matches for
* deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected.
*
* @param classNameMatcher the matcher to use
*/
public void accept(ClassNameMatcher classNameMatcher)
/**
* Accept class names that match the supplied pattern for
* deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected.
*
* @param pattern standard Java regexp
*/
public void accept(Pattern pattern)
/**
* Accept the wildcard specified classes for deserialization,
* unless they are otherwise rejected.
*
* @param patterns Wildcard file name patterns as defined by
* {@link org.apache.commons.io.FilenameUtils#wildcardMatch(String, String) FilenameUtils.wildcardMatch}
*/
public void accept(String... patterns)
By default, the decoder will reject *all* classes that will be present in the incoming data.
Note: The FtpServer, SSHd an
Affected
18 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | mina | >= 2.0.0 < 2.0.27 | 2.0.27 |
| apache | mina | >= 2.0.0 < 2.0.28 | 2.0.28 |
| apache | mina | >= 2.1.0 < 2.1.10 | 2.1.10 |
| apache | mina | >= 2.1.0 < 2.1.12 | 2.1.12 |
| apache | mina | >= 2.1.0 < 2.1.11 | 2.1.11 |
| apache | mina | >= 2.2.0 < 2.2.4 | 2.2.4 |
| apache | mina | >= 2.2.0 < 2.2.7 | 2.2.7 |
| apache | mina | >= 2.2.0 < 2.2.6 | 2.2.6 |
| apache_software_foundation | apache_mina | 2.1.X – 2.1.11 | — |
| apache_software_foundation | apache_mina | 2.2.X – 2.2.6 | — |
| debian | mina | < mina2 2.2.1-4 (forky) | mina2 2.2.1-4 (forky) |
| debian | mina2 | < mina2 2.2.1-4 (forky) | mina2 2.2.1-4 (forky) |
| javapackages-tools_201801 | maven-wagon | — | — |
| jenkins | jenkins | — | — |
| maven_3.9 | maven-wagon | — | — |
| ocp-tools-4 | jenkins-rhel8 | — | — |
| ocp-tools-4 | jenkins-rhel9 | — | — |
| ubuntu | mina2 | — | — |
Detection & IOCsextracted from sources · hover to see the quote
- →Vulnerability is only exploitable if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called — monitor for use of this method in applications using Apache MINA ↗
- →Exploitation path requires a ProtocolCodecFilter instance added using ObjectSerializationCodecFactory in the filter chain — detect or audit filter chain configurations for this class ↗
- →Attack vector is sending specially crafted malicious serialized Java data over the network to the MINA listener — inspect network traffic for Java serialized object magic bytes (0xACED0005) targeting MINA services ↗
- →An incomplete fix (CVE-2026-41409) allows a static initializer in a class to execute before the classname allowlist is applied — even patched MINA instances calling IoBuffer.getObject() may be bypassable ↗
- ·Affected versions are MINA core 2.0.0–2.0.26, 2.1.0–2.1.9, and 2.2.0–2.2.3; fixed in 2.0.27, 2.1.10, and 2.2.4 — upgrading alone is insufficient ↗
- ·After upgrading, operators must explicitly configure an allowlist of accepted classes in ObjectSerializationDecoder using accept(ClassNameMatcher), accept(Pattern), or accept(String...) — by default ALL classes are rejected ↗
- ·FtpServer, SSHd, and Vysper sub-projects are not affected by this issue ↗
- ·Oracle Fusion Middleware is also affected via the third-party Apache MINA dependency (CVSS 9.8, remotely exploitable over HTTP) ↗
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.19.8CRITICALCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvdv4.010.0CRITICALCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
ghsa10.0CRITICAL
osv10.0CRITICAL
vendor_debian10.0CRITICAL
vendor_redhat10.0CRITICAL
vendor_oracle9.8CRITICAL
vendor_ubuntu9.8CRITICAL
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Ubuntu
Apache MINA vulnerabilities
vendor_ubuntu·2026-06-23·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2026-47065 [CRITICAL] Apache MINA vulnerabilities
Title: Apache MINA vulnerabilities
Summary: Apache MINA could be made to run programs if it received specially crafted
network traffic.
It was discovered that Apache MINA lacked an acceptMatchers allowlist
mechanism to restrict which classes could be deserialized. An attacker
could use this to execute arbitrary code. This issue only affected
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-52046)
It was discovered that Apache MINA's deserialization filter could be
bypassed via multiple code paths. An attacker could use this to execute
arbitrary code by sending a specially crafted serialized object over the
network. (CVE-2026-42778, CVE-2026-42779, CVE-2026-47065)
Instructions: In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
Red Hat
Apache MINA: Apache MINA: Arbitrary code execution via incomplete deserialization fix
vendor_redhat·2026-04-27·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2026-41409 [CRITICAL] CWE-502 Apache MINA: Apache MINA: Arbitrary code execution via incomplete deserialization fix
Apache MINA: Apache MINA: Arbitrary code execution via incomplete deserialization fix
A flaw was found in Apache MINA. An incomplete fix for a deserialization vulnerability in the `AbstractIoBuffer.getObject()` method allowed a static initializer in a class to be executed before the classname allowlist was applied. This could enable a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by sending specially crafted data to an application using Apache MINA that calls `IoBuffer.getObject()`.
Statement: This is a Critical deserialization flaw in Apache MINA, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. It addresses an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-52046 which could bypass security controls. Red Hat products are affected if they utilize Apache MINA and invoke the `IoBuffer.getObject()` method.
P
Oracle
Oracle Oracle HealthCare Applications Risk Matrix: XAD-PID Change Management XPID (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
vendor_oracle·2026-01-15·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] Oracle Oracle HealthCare Applications Risk Matrix: XAD-PID Change Management XPID (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
Oracle Oracle HealthCare Applications Risk Matrix: XAD-PID Change Management XPID (Apache Mina) vulnerability
CVE: CVE-2024-52046
CVSS: 9.8
Protocol: SSH
Remote exploit: Yes
Affected versions: Network
Advisory: cpujan2026 (JAN 2026)
Oracle
Oracle Oracle JD Edwards Risk Matrix: Business Logic Infra SEC (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
vendor_oracle·2025-10-15·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] Oracle Oracle JD Edwards Risk Matrix: Business Logic Infra SEC (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
Oracle Oracle JD Edwards Risk Matrix: Business Logic Infra SEC (Apache Mina) vulnerability
CVE: CVE-2024-52046
CVSS: 9.8
Protocol: SFTP
Remote exploit: Yes
Affected versions: Network
Advisory: cpuoct2025 (OCT 2025)
Oracle
Oracle Oracle Fusion Middleware Risk Matrix: Third Party (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
vendor_oracle·2025-07-15·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] Oracle Oracle Fusion Middleware Risk Matrix: Third Party (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
Oracle Oracle Fusion Middleware Risk Matrix: Third Party (Apache Mina) vulnerability
CVE: CVE-2024-52046
CVSS: 9.8
Protocol: HTTP
Remote exploit: Yes
Affected versions: Network
Advisory: cpujul2025 (JUL 2025)
Oracle
Oracle Oracle Communications Applications Risk Matrix: FileTransferJCA, VPLS Cartridge, TL1 Cartridge (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
vendor_oracle·2025-04-15·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] Oracle Oracle Communications Applications Risk Matrix: FileTransferJCA, VPLS Cartridge, TL1 Cartridge (Apache Mina) — CVE-2024-52046
Oracle Oracle Communications Applications Risk Matrix: FileTransferJCA, VPLS Cartridge, TL1 Cartridge (Apache Mina) vulnerability
CVE: CVE-2024-52046
CVSS: 9.8
Protocol: HTTP
Remote exploit: Yes
Affected versions: Network
Advisory: cpuapr2025 (APR 2025)
Red Hat
mina-core: Apache MINA: applications using unbounded deserialization may allow RCE
vendor_redhat·2024-12-25·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] CWE-94 mina-core: Apache MINA: applications using unbounded deserialization may allow RCE
mina-core: Apache MINA: applications using unbounded deserialization may allow RCE
The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process
incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows
attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data,
potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks.
This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4.
It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter in
Debian
CVE-2024-52046: mina - The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization...
vendor_debian·2024·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] CVE-2024-52046: mina - The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization...
The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks. This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4. It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the ObjectSerializationCodecFactory class in the filter chain. If your
GHSA
Apache MINA vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CVE-2026-41409 Incomplete Fix)
ghsa·2026-05-01·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2026-42778 [CRITICAL] CWE-502 Apache MINA vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CVE-2026-41409 Incomplete Fix)
Apache MINA vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CVE-2026-41409 Incomplete Fix)
The fix for CVE-2026-41409 was not applied to the 2.1.X and 2.2.X branches. Here was the original issue description:
The fix for CVE-2024-52046 in Apache MINA AbstractIoBuffer.getObject() was incomplete. The classname allowlist of classes allowed to be deserialized was applied too late after a static initializer in a class to be read might already have been executed.
Affected versions are Apache MINA 2.1.0 <= 2.1.11, and 2.2.0 <= 2.2.6.
The problem is resolved in Apache MINA 2.1.12, and 2.2.7 by applying the classname allowlist earlier.
Affected are applications using Apache MINA that call IoBuffer.getObject().
Applications using Apache MINA are advised to upgrade.
GHSA
GHSA-995c-6rp3-4m4x: The fix for CVE-2026-41409 was not applied to the 2
ghsa_unreviewed·2026-05-01·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2026-42778 [CRITICAL] CWE-502 GHSA-995c-6rp3-4m4x: The fix for CVE-2026-41409 was not applied to the 2
The fix for CVE-2026-41409 was not applied to the 2.1.X and 2.2.X branches. Here was the original issue description:
The fix for CVE-2024-52046 in Apache MINA AbstractIoBuffer.getObject() was incomplete. The classname allowlist of classes allowed to be deserialized was applied too late after a static initializer in a class to be read might already have been executed.
Affected versions are Apache MINA 2.1.0 <= 2.1.11, and 2.2.0 <= 2.2.6.
The problem is resolved in Apache MINA 2.1.12, and 2.2.7 by
applying the classname allowlist earlier.
Affected are applications using Apache MINA that call IoBuffer.getObject().
Applications using Apache MINA are advised to upgrade
The fix for CVE-2024-52046 in Apache MINA AbstractIoBuffer.getObject() was incomplete. The classname allowlist of c
GHSA
Apache MINA Vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CVE-2024-52046 Incomplete Fix)
ghsa·2026-04-27·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2026-41409 [CRITICAL] CWE-502 Apache MINA Vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CVE-2024-52046 Incomplete Fix)
Apache MINA Vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CVE-2024-52046 Incomplete Fix)
The fix for CVE-2024-52046 in Apache MINA AbstractIoBuffer.getObject() was incomplete. The classname allowlist of classes allowed to be deserialized was applied too late after a static initializer in a class to be read might already have been executed.
Affected versions are Apache MINA 2.0.0 <= 2.0.27, 2.1.0 <= 2.1.10, and 2.2.0 <= 2.2.5.
The problem is resolved in Apache MINA 2.0.28, 2.1.11, and 2.2.6 by applying the classname allowlist earlier.
Affected are applications using Apache MINA that call IoBuffer.getObject().
Applications using Apache MINA are advised to upgrade
OSV
CVE-2024-52046: The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary
osv·2024-12-25·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] CVE-2024-52046: The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary
The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks. This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4. It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the ObjectSerializationCodecFactory class in the filter chain. If your
OSV
Apache MINA Deserialization RCE Vulnerability
osv·2024-12-25
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] Apache MINA Deserialization RCE Vulnerability
Apache MINA Deserialization RCE Vulnerability
The `ObjectSerializationDecoder` in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks.
This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4.
It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the `ObjectSerializa
GHSA
Apache MINA Deserialization RCE Vulnerability
ghsa·2024-12-25
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] CWE-502 Apache MINA Deserialization RCE Vulnerability
Apache MINA Deserialization RCE Vulnerability
The `ObjectSerializationDecoder` in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks.
This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4.
It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the `ObjectSerializa
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2026-42778 Apache MINA: deserialization of untrusted data (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-41409)
bugzilla·2026-05-01·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2026-42778 [CRITICAL] CVE-2026-42778 Apache MINA: deserialization of untrusted data (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-41409)
CVE-2026-42778 Apache MINA: deserialization of untrusted data (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-41409)
The fix for CVE-2026-41409 was not applied to the 2.1.X and 2.2.X branches. Here was the original issue description:
The fix for CVE-2024-52046 in Apache MINA AbstractIoBuffer.getObject() was incomplete. The classname allowlist of classes allowed to be deserialized was applied too late after a static initializer in a class to be read might already have been executed.
Affected versions are Apache MINA 2.1.0 <= 2.1.11, and 2.2.0 <= 2.2.6.
The problem is resolved in Apache MINA 2.1.12, and 2.2.7 by
applying the classname allowlist earlier.
Affected are applications using Apache MINA that call IoBuffer.getObject().
Applications using Apache MINA are advised to upgrade
The fix for CVE-
Bugzilla
CVE-2026-41409 Apache MINA: Apache MINA: Arbitrary code execution via incomplete deserialization fix
bugzilla·2026-04-27·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2026-41409 [CRITICAL] CVE-2026-41409 Apache MINA: Apache MINA: Arbitrary code execution via incomplete deserialization fix
CVE-2026-41409 Apache MINA: Apache MINA: Arbitrary code execution via incomplete deserialization fix
The fix for CVE-2024-52046 in Apache MINA AbstractIoBuffer.getObject() was incomplete. The classname allowlist of classes allowed to be deserialized was applied too late after a static initializer in a class to be read might already have been executed.
Affected versions are Apache MINA 2.0.0 <= 2.0.27, 2.1.0 <= 2.1.10, and 2.2.0 <= 2.2.5.
The problem is resolved in Apache MINA 2.0.28, 2.1.11, and 2.2.6 by
applying the classname allowlist earlier.
Affected are applications using Apache MINA that call IoBuffer.getObject().
Applications using Apache MINA are advised to upgrade
Bugzilla
CVE-2024-52046 mina-core: Apache MINA: applications using unbounded deserialization may allow RCE
bugzilla·2024-12-25·CVSS 10.0
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] CVE-2024-52046 mina-core: Apache MINA: applications using unbounded deserialization may allow RCE
CVE-2024-52046 mina-core: Apache MINA: applications using unbounded deserialization may allow RCE
The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process
incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows
attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data,
potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks.
This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4.
It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when
Qualys
Oracle Critical Patch Update, July 2025 Security Update Review
blogs_qualys·2025-07-16
Oracle Critical Patch Update, July 2025 Security Update Review
## Table of Contents
Qualys QID Coverage
Notable Oracle Vulnerabilities Patched
Oracle released its second quarterly edition of this year’s Critical Patch Update. The update received patches for 309 security vulnerabilities. Some of the vulnerabilities addressed in this update impact more than one product. These patches address vulnerabilities in various product families, including third-party components in Oracle products.
In this quarterly Oracle Critical Patch Update, Oracle Communications received the highest number of patches, 84, constituting about 27% of the total patches released. Oracle MySQL and Oracle Fusion Middleware followed, with 40 and 36 security patches.
228 of the 309 security patches provided by the July Critical Patch Update (about 74%) are for non-Oracle CVEs, su
Qualys
Oracle Critical Patch Update, July 2025 Security Update Review | Qualys
blogs_qualys·2025-07-16
Oracle Critical Patch Update, July 2025 Security Update Review | Qualys
#### Table of Contents
- Qualys QID Coverage
- Notable Oracle Vulnerabilities Patched
Oracle released its second quarterly edition of this year’s Critical Patch Update. The update received patches for 309 security vulnerabilities. Some of the vulnerabilities addressed in this update impact more than one product. These patches address vulnerabilities in various product families, including third-party components in Oracle products.
In this quarterly Oracle Critical Patch Update, Oracle Communications received the highest number of patches, 84, constituting about 27% of the total patches released. Oracle MySQL and Oracle Fusion Middleware followed, with 40 and 36 security patches.
228 of the 309 security patches provided by the July Critical Patch Update (about 74%) are for non-Oracle CVE
Qualys
Oracle Critical Patch Update, April 2025 Security Update Review
blogs_qualys·2025-04-16
Oracle Critical Patch Update, April 2025 Security Update Review
## Table of Contents
Qualys QID Coverage
Notable Oracle Vulnerabilities Patched
Oracle released its first quarterly edition of this year’s Critical Patch Update. The update received patches for 378 s ecurity vulnerabilities. Some of the vulnerabilities addressed in this update impact more than one product. These patches address vulnerabilities in various product families, including third-party components in Oracle products.
In this quarterly Oracle Critical Patch Update, Oracle Communications received the highest number of patches, 103, constituting about 27% of the total patches released. Oracle MySQL and Oracle Communications Applications followed, with 43 and 42 security patches.
300 of the 378 security patches provided by the April Critical Patch Update (about 79%) are for non-Ora
Qualys
Oracle Critical Patch Update, April 2025 Security Update Review | Qualys
blogs_qualys·2025-04-16
Oracle Critical Patch Update, April 2025 Security Update Review | Qualys
#### Table of Contents
- Qualys QID Coverage
- Notable Oracle Vulnerabilities Patched
Oracle released its first quarterly edition of this year’s Critical Patch Update. The update received patches for 378 security vulnerabilities. Some of the vulnerabilities addressed in this update impact more than one product. These patches address vulnerabilities in various product families, including third-party components in Oracle products.
In this quarterly Oracle Critical Patch Update, Oracle Communications received the highest number of patches, 103, constituting about 27% of the total patches released. Oracle MySQL and Oracle Communications Applications followed, with 43 and 42 security patches.
300 of the 378 security patches provided by the April Critical Patch Update (about 79%) are for non
Checkpoint
30th December – Threat Intelligence Report
blogs_checkpoint·2024-12-30·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-50623 [CRITICAL] 30th December – Threat Intelligence Report
Latest Publications
CPR Podcast Channel
AI Research
Web 3.0 Security
Intelligence Reports
ThreatCloud AI
Threat Intelligence & Research
Zero Day Protection
Sandblast File Analysis
About Us
SUBSCRIBE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
## 30th December – Threat Intelligence Report
For the latest discoveries in cyber research for the week of 30th December, please download our Threat Intelligence Bulletin .
TOP ATTACKS AND BREACHES
The Clop ransomware gang exploited a zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2024-50623) in Cleo’s Secure File Transfer products and is extorting 66 companies following alleged data theft. The attackers have given the victims 48 hours to initiate ransom negotiations before publicly disclosing their identities. This incident mirrors
Bleepingcomputer
Apache warns of critical flaws in MINA, HugeGraph, Traffic Control
blogs_bleepingcomputer·2024-12-26·CVSS 9.8
CVE-2024-52046 [CRITICAL] Apache warns of critical flaws in MINA, HugeGraph, Traffic Control
## Apache warns of critical flaws in MINA, HugeGraph, Traffic Control
## Bill Toulas
The Apache Software Foundation has released security updates to address three severe problems that affect MINA, HugeGraph-Server, and Traffic Control products.
The vulnerabilities were patched in new software versions released between December 23 and 25. However, the holiday period may lead to a slower patching rate and increased risk of exploitation.
One of the bugs is tracked as CVE-2024-52046 and impacts MINA versions 2.0 through 2.0.26, 2.1 through 2.1.9, and 2.2 through 2.2.3. The issue received a critical severity score of 10 out of 10 from the Apache Software Foundation
Apache MINA is a network application framework that provides an abstraction layer for developing high-performance and scalable
arXiv
False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systems
arxiv_fulltext·2026-01-28
False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systems
False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on
Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systems
Samaneh Shafee, Alysson Bessani, Pedro M. Ferreira
[email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
LASIGE, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
## Abstract
Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) has emerged as a vital complementary approach that operates in the early phases of the cyber threat lifecycle.
CTI involves collecting, processing, and analysing threat data to provide a more accurate and rapid understanding of cyber threats.
Due to the large volume of data, automation through Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) models is essential for effective CTI extraction.
These automated systems leverage Open So
2024-12-25
Published