CVE-2025-36935
published 2025-12-11CVE-2025-36935: In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of…
PriorityP343high7.8CVSS 3.1
AVLACLPRLUINSUCHIHAH
EPSS
0.07%
0.1th percentile
In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| android | — | — |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
GHSA
GHSA-hxfw-5p57-pw36: In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall
ghsa_unreviewed·2025-12-11
CVE-2025-36935 [HIGH] CWE-457 GHSA-hxfw-5p57-pw36: In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall
In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
OSV
CVE-2025-36935: In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall
osv·2025-12-01
CVE-2025-36935 CVE-2025-36935: In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall
In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
2025-12-11
Published