CVE-2025-69203
published 2026-01-01CVE-2025-69203: Signal K Server is a server application that runs on a central hub in a boat. Versions prior to 2.19.0 of the access request system have two related features…
PriorityP350high8.8CVSS 3.1
AVNACLPRNUIRSUCHIHAH
EPSS
0.27%
18.8th percentile
Signal K Server is a server application that runs on a central hub in a boat. Versions prior to 2.19.0 of the access request system have two related features that when combined by themselves and with an information disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators. When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: `clientId`, `description`, and `permissions`. The SignalK admin UI displays the `description` field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual `permissions` field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request `admin` permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access. The access request handler trusts the `X-Forwarded-For` HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses. Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval. Users should upgrade to version 2.19.0 to fix this issue.
Affected
4 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| signalk | signal_k_server | < 2.19.0 | 2.19.0 |
| signalk | signal_k_server | — | — |
| signalk | signalk-server | < 2.19.0 | 2.19.0 |
| signalk | signalk-server | >= 0 < 2.19.0 | 2.19.0 |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
OSV
Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing
osv·2026-01-02
CVE-2025-69203 [MEDIUM] Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing
Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing
The SignalK access request system has two related features that when combined by themselves and with the infromation disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators.
When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: `clientId`, `description`, and `permissions`. The SignalK admin UI displays the `description` field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual `permissions` field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request `admin` permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access.
The access request handler trusts the `X-Forwarded-For` HTTP hea
GHSA
Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing
ghsa·2026-01-02
CVE-2025-69203 [MEDIUM] CWE-290 Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing
Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing
The SignalK access request system has two related features that when combined by themselves and with the infromation disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators.
When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: `clientId`, `description`, and `permissions`. The SignalK admin UI displays the `description` field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual `permissions` field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request `admin` permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access.
The access request handler trusts the `X-Forwarded-For` HTTP hea
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
2026-01-01
Published