CVE-2025-7043
published 2026-10-19CVE-2025-7043: The ForgeRock client fails to correctly validate refresh tokens. This allows a refresh token to be treated as a valid access token, enabling its use for…
PriorityP432medium5.4CVSS 3.1
AVNACHPRNUINSCCLILAN
EPSS
0.18%
7.6th percentile
The ForgeRock client fails to correctly validate refresh tokens. This allows a refresh token to be treated as a valid access token, enabling its use for consuming protected resources. This bypasses the intended security control that requires valid client credentials in addition to a refresh token to obtain a new access token.
An attacker who obtains a stolen or exposed refresh token can leverage this vulnerability to directly access protected resources. This is possible because the standard security flow requiring client credentials to exchange a refresh token for an access token is circumvented.
Affected
14 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| wso2 | forgerock_key_manager_component | >= 1.0.0 < 1.0.0.3 | 1.0.0.3 |
| wso2 | forgerock_key_manager_component | >= 1.0.0 < 1.0.0.4 | 1.0.0.4 |
| wso2 | forgerock_key_manager_component | >= 1.1.0 < 1.1.0.2 | 1.1.0.2 |
| wso2 | forgerock_key_manager_component | >= 1.1.5 < 1.1.5.3 | 1.1.5.3 |
| wso2 | forgerock_key_manager_component | >= 1.1.5 < 1.1.5.4 | 1.1.5.4 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_control_plane | >= 4.5.0 < 4.5.0.15 | 4.5.0.15 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_manager | >= 3.2.0 < 3.2.0.434 | 3.2.0.434 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_manager | >= 3.2.1 < 3.2.1.54 | 3.2.1.54 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_manager | >= 4.1.0 < 4.1.0.218 | 4.1.0.218 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_manager | >= 4.2.0 < 4.2.0.156 | 4.2.0.156 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_manager | >= 4.3.0 < 4.3.0.67 | 4.3.0.67 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_manager | >= 4.4.0 < 4.4.0.30 | 4.4.0.30 |
| wso2 | wso2_api_manager | >= 4.5.0 < 4.5.0.14 | 4.5.0.14 |
| wso2 | wso2_universal_gateway | >= 4.5.0 < 4.5.0.14 | 4.5.0.14 |
CVSS provenance
nvdv3.15.4MEDIUMCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vendor_redhat5.5MEDIUM
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
Bugzilla
CVE-2024-31157 microcode_ctl: Improper initialization in UEFI firmware OutOfBandXML module
bugzilla·2025-02-12·CVSS 5.3
CVE-2024-31157 [MEDIUM] CVE-2024-31157 microcode_ctl: Improper initialization in UEFI firmware OutOfBandXML module
CVE-2024-31157 microcode_ctl: Improper initialization in UEFI firmware OutOfBandXML module
Improper initialization in UEFI firmware OutOfBandXML module in some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
Discussion:
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Via RHSA-2025:7043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7043
Bugzilla
CVE-2024-39279 microcode_ctl: Insufficient granularity of access control in UEFI firmware
bugzilla·2025-02-12·CVSS 6.5
CVE-2024-39279 [MEDIUM] CVE-2024-39279 microcode_ctl: Insufficient granularity of access control in UEFI firmware
CVE-2024-39279 microcode_ctl: Insufficient granularity of access control in UEFI firmware
Insufficient granularity of access control in UEFI firmware in some Intel(R) processors may allow a authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access.
Discussion:
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Via RHSA-2025:7043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7043
Bugzilla
CVE-2024-28047 microcode_ctl: Improper input validation in UEFI firmware
bugzilla·2025-02-12·CVSS 5.3
CVE-2024-28047 [MEDIUM] CVE-2024-28047 microcode_ctl: Improper input validation in UEFI firmware
CVE-2024-28047 microcode_ctl: Improper input validation in UEFI firmware
Improper input validation in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
Discussion:
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Via RHSA-2025:7043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7043
2026-10-19
Published