CVE-2026-105298
published 2026-10-20CVE-2026-105298: Summary Before version 0.9.0, Pingora accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header. Request filters, cache keys, and…
PriorityP344medium6.3CVSS 4.0
AVNACLATPPRNUINVCNVINVANSCLSILSANEXCRXIRXARXMAVXMACXMATXMPRXMUIXMVCXMVIXMVAXMSCXMSIXMSAXSXAUXRXVXREXUX
EPSS
0.44%
37.2th percentile
Summary
Before version 0.9.0, Pingora accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header. Request filters, cache keys, and logs that read the request URI (session.req_header().uri) saw the :authority value, but the upstream received the client-supplied Host value. Pingora also accepted :authority values containing userinfo (for example, [email protected]). This violates RFC 9113 Section 8.3.1, which requires an intermediary to use the :authority value for Host and replace any existing Host field.
Root cause
*
HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1: Host was generated from :authority only when the request had no Host header, so a conflicting client Host was forwarded unchanged.
*
HTTP/2 to HTTP/2: the client Host header was removed and used to overwrite the upstream :authority, after request filters had already run against the original :authority.
*
The HTTP/2 server did not compare Host with :authority and did not reject userinfo in the authority.
Impact
A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a single HTTP/2 request that the application sees as one host and the upstream receives as another. Where request filters, access controls, or cache keys use the URI authority and the upstream routes by Host, this can lead to:
*
Cache poisoning: a response from another virtual host is stored under the victim host's cache key and served to other users (this also requires the upstream to serve different content per Host).
*
Host-based access control bypass: a request approved for one host is served by a different virtual host on the upstream.
Deployments that do not accept HTTP/2 from clients, or that do not use the request authority for security or caching decisions, are not affected.
Note that Cloudflare CDN customers were unaffected, as internal Pingora services at Cloudflare do not have HTTP/2 clients.
Mitigation:
*
Upgrade to pingora 0.9.0 or later. Pingora now returns 400 Bad Request for HTTP/2 requests whose Host differs from
Affected
1 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| cloudflare | https_github.com_cloudflare_pingora | >= 0.1.0 < 0.9.0 | 0.9.0 |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
VulDB
Cloudflare Pingora up to 0.8.x HTTP/2 Proxy req_header Host access control
vuldb·2026-10-20·CVSS 6.3
CVE-2026-105298 [MEDIUM] Cloudflare Pingora up to 0.8.x HTTP/2 Proxy req_header Host access control
A vulnerability labeled as very critical has been found in Cloudflare Pingora up to 0.8.x. Affected is the function req_header of the component HTTP2 Proxy. The manipulation of the argument Host results in improper access controls.
This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2026-105298. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available.
The affected component should be upgraded.
GHSA
Summary Before version 0.9.0, Pingora accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header.
ghsa_unreviewed·2026-10-20
CVE-2026-105298 [MEDIUM] CWE-444 Summary Before version 0.9.0, Pingora accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header.
Summary
Before version 0.9.0, Pingora accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header. Request filters, cache keys, and logs that read the request URI (session.req_header().uri) saw the :authority value, but the upstream received the client-supplied Host value. Pingora also accepted :authority values containing userinfo (for example, [email protected]). This violates RFC 9113 Section 8.3.1, which requires an intermediary to use the :authority value for Host and replace any existing Host field.
Root cause
*
HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1: Host was generated from :authority only when the request had no Host header, so a conflicting client Host was forwarded unchanged.
*
HTTP/2 to HTTP/2: the client Host header was removed and used to overwrite the upstream :
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
No writeups or analysis indexed.
2026-10-20
Published