CVE-2026-23400
published 2026-03-29CVE-2026-23400: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock Consider the following sequence…
PriorityP421medium5.5CVSS 3.1
AVLACLPRLUINSUCNINAH
EPSS
0.09%
0.6th percentile
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
Consider the following sequence of events on a death listener:
1. The remote process dies and sends a BR_DEAD_BINDER message.
2. The local process invokes the BC_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION command.
3. The local process then invokes the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE.
Then, the kernel will reply to the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE command with a
BR_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION_DONE reply using push_work_if_looper().
However, this can result in a deadlock if the current thread is not a
looper. This is because dead_binder_done() still holds the proc lock
during set_notification_done(), which called push_work_if_looper().
Normally, push_work_if_looper() takes the thread lock, which is fine to
take under the proc lock. But if the current thread is not a looper,
then it falls back to delivering the reply to the process work queue,
which involves taking the proc lock. Since the proc lock is already
held, this is a deadlock.
Fix this by releasing the proc lock during set_notification_done(). It
was not intentional that it was held during that function to begin with.
I don't think this ever happens in Android because BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE
is only invoked in response to BR_DEAD_BINDER messages, and the kernel
always delivers BR_DEAD_BINDER to a looper. So there's no scenario where
Android userspace will call BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE on a non-looper thread.
Affected
12 ranges
| Vendor | Product | Version range | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| debian | linux | < linux 6.19.10-1 (forky) | linux 6.19.10-1 (forky) |
| linux | linux | — | — |
| linux | linux | >= eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < dd109e3442817bc03ad1f3ffd541092f8c428141 | dd109e3442817bc03ad1f3ffd541092f8c428141 |
| linux | linux | >= eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 3be72099067d2cd4a0e089696f19780f75b2b88a | 3be72099067d2cd4a0e089696f19780f75b2b88a |
| linux | linux | >= eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 2e303f0febb65a434040774b793ba8356698802b | 2e303f0febb65a434040774b793ba8356698802b |
| linux | linux_kernel | — | — |
| linux | linux_kernel | — | — |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 0 < 6.19.10-1 | 6.19.10-1 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 6.18.0 < 6.18.19 | 6.18.19 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 6.18.1 < 6.18.19 | 6.18.19 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 6.19 < 6.19.9 | 6.19.9 |
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 6.19.0 < 6.19.9 | 6.19.9 |
Stop checking back — get the weekly exploitation signal.
Every Monday: what got weaponized or added to CISA KEV in the last seven days — each CVE cross-linked to its PoC, Nuclei template, and detection rule. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
OSV
CVE-2026-23400: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock Consider the following
osv·2026-03-29
CVE-2026-23400 CVE-2026-23400: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock Consider the following
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock Consider the following sequence of events on a death listener: 1. The remote process dies and sends a BR_DEAD_BINDER message. 2. The local process invokes the BC_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION command. 3. The local process then invokes the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE. Then, the kernel will reply to the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE command with a BR_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION_DONE reply using push_work_if_looper(). However, this can result in a deadlock if the current thread is not a looper. This is because dead_binder_done() still holds the proc lock during set_notification_done(), which called push_work_if_looper(). Normally, push_work_if_looper() takes the thread lock, which is fine to
OSV
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
osv·2026-03-29
CVE-2026-23400 rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
Consider the following sequence of events on a death listener:
1. The remote process dies and sends a BR_DEAD_BINDER message.
2. The local process invokes the BC_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION command.
3. The local process then invokes the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE.
Then, the kernel will reply to the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE command with a
BR_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION_DONE reply using push_work_if_looper().
However, this can result in a deadlock if the current thread is not a
looper. This is because dead_binder_done() still holds the proc lock
during set_notification_done(), which called push_work_if_looper().
Normally
GHSA
GHSA-pff6-g7ww-p3v3: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
Consider the followi
ghsa_unreviewed·2026-03-29
CVE-2026-23400 GHSA-pff6-g7ww-p3v3: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
Consider the followi
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
Consider the following sequence of events on a death listener:
1. The remote process dies and sends a BR_DEAD_BINDER message.
2. The local process invokes the BC_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION command.
3. The local process then invokes the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE.
Then, the kernel will reply to the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE command with a
BR_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION_DONE reply using push_work_if_looper().
However, this can result in a deadlock if the current thread is not a
looper. This is because dead_binder_done() still holds the proc lock
during set_notification_done(), which called push_work_if_looper().
Normally, push_work_if_looper() takes the thread lock, which is fine
Red Hat
kernel: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
vendor_redhat·2026-03-29
CVE-2026-23400 CWE-833 kernel: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
kernel: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock
Consider the following sequence of events on a death listener:
1. The remote process dies and sends a BR_DEAD_BINDER message.
2. The local process invokes the BC_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION command.
3. The local process then invokes the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE.
Then, the kernel will reply to the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE command with a
BR_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION_DONE reply using push_work_if_looper().
However, this can result in a deadlock if the current thread is not a
looper. This is because dead_binder_done() still holds the proc lock
during set_notification_done(), which called push_work_if_looper().
Nor
Debian
CVE-2026-23400: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder...
vendor_debian·2026
CVE-2026-23400 [LOW] CVE-2026-23400: linux - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: call set_notification_done() without proc lock Consider the following sequence of events on a death listener: 1. The remote process dies and sends a BR_DEAD_BINDER message. 2. The local process invokes the BC_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION command. 3. The local process then invokes the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE. Then, the kernel will reply to the BC_DEAD_BINDER_DONE command with a BR_CLEAR_DEATH_NOTIFICATION_DONE reply using push_work_if_looper(). However, this can result in a deadlock if the current thread is not a looper. This is because dead_binder_done() still holds the proc lock during set_notification_done(), which called push_work_if_looper(). Normally, push_work_if_looper() takes the thread lock, which is fine to
No detection rules found.
No public exploits indexed.
2026-03-29
Published